Channel
@khawaaaaatir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,593subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003769146281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khawaaaaatir |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 17 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khawaaaaatir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 1,593 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 1,592 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 1,591 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,591 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 June 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,155 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (239) Ready-made Sutrah boards - An Excessive Formality Question: Honourable Sheikh. In the masjids in Morocco, planks and wooden boards have become widespread, which worshippers use as sutrah/barriers for their prayer. Is it permissible to pray using these as sutrah or to intentionally seek them out for this purpose? Sheikh Yūsuf Al-Jazaa’iri hafidahullāh: This practice falls under excessive formality (ت…
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (238) Ruling on Borrowing Money from Someone Whose Wealth Is Mixed with Halal and Haram Question: The respected Shaykh (may Allah preserve you), I wanted to borrow some money from a person, but his wealth is a mix of lawful and unlawful income. I was also told that he does not pray, although I am not certain about that. Is it permissible for me to borrow money from him? Sheikh Salih Al-Fawzān hafidhahulla…
Mark Your Calenders 📌
Presenting Sadaqah Opportunities
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (237) Presenting Sadaqah Jariyah Opportunities Question: A brother asks: Is it permissible to ask people for money to build masjids? Sheikh Rashad Adh-Dhali'ee hafidhahullah: If what is meant is presenting the opportunity to them to build a masjid, or informing them about a country or place that is in need of a masjid, then this is permissible. The Prophet ﷺ encouraged this. He said: "Who will buy the la…
📣 Get Ready — The Summer Conference is Almost Here! #Dawrah ⭐️ Featuring a special guest speaker 🗓️ Full itinerary coming soon inshaAllah 📌 Mark your calendars now! https://t.me/masjidsahabah/2134
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (236) Renewing Tayammum The majority of scholars hold that it is not recommended to renew tayammum. Some said it is recommended to renew it, but this is the weaker view within the Shafi'i school. --- Evidence of those who say it is not recommended: They argued: There is no evidence for its legitimacy, and the default in acts of worship is prohibition (no act is prescribed unless proven). They also said: …
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (235) Saying "Bismillah" Before Tayammum Scholars differed on this matter into several opinions: · Some said it is a Sunnah (recommended practice). This is the view of the Hanafi school, the Shafi'i school, and one narration from Imam Ahmad, which Ibn Qudamah chose. · Some said it is among the virtues of wudu (not obligatory, but good). This is the well-known view of the Maliki school. · Some said it is…
First evidence: The default in acts of worship is that they are not legislated unless proven by authentic evidence. The hadiths on tayammum do not mention saying "Bismillah." And Allah does not forget. Second evidence: The verse on tayammum in the Quran, as well as the hadiths transmitted about it, are completely silent on saying "Bismillah." If it were prescribed, Allah would have mentioned it in His Book, and the …
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (234) On What Materials Tayammum Is Valid Question: What is the ruling on performing tayammum using things that are attached to the earth, such as stones, iron, copper, trees, grass, and similar materials? May Allah reward you. Answer (forwarded): The scholars agree that tayammum is valid with clean, pure soil (earth/dust). They differed, however, about other materials that come from or are part of the ea…
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (233) It's like carrying your own drug dealer
𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (232) How long will we remain in this life?! Another ten years? Twenty? Thirty? By Allah, it is insignificant and short when we truly reflect on it. It will pass just as the years we have already lived have passed. Allah says: “And on the Day the Hour is established, the criminals will swear that they remained only for an hour.” So focus on what will benefit you in the real life—the life of the Hereafter…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khawaaaaatir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,321,648 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خواطر Reflections” (@khawaaaaatir), 1,593 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khawaaaaatir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.