Channel
Khat payan 403
@khatpayan403
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,395subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002229462893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khatpayan403 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khatpayan403 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:54 | 1,395 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 1,395 | -8 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 1,403 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 1,407 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 1,412 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 1,417 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:24 | 1,421 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 1,422 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 1,425 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,431 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,438 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 1,441 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,444 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,445 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dr_parsa_gh · 26,581
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@Amirh_rasekh1 · 45,449
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@dr_sohrabimofrad_4 · 232,717
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@tikschoolll · 49,778
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
@ramous20 · 47,835
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@novawisez · 18
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@miladnasehzadeh_cafekonkoor · 43,515
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@konkoortaster2 · 56
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@vesta_academyy · 28,921
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
@Resane_Farhangian · 166,465
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@konkor1404_scam · 103,928
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 11 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Khat payan 403” (@khatpayan403), 1,395 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khatpayan403.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.