Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 January 2026 to 10 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Ettelaate1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,850–1,859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:24
1,851
-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:34
1,853
-5
6 Aug 2026, 06:48
1,858
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:44
1,858
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 33s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
امروز چهارشنبه
بیستم خرداد ماه
از خداوند می خواهم
همان چیز هایی را
نصیب تان کند که
از نظر خودش بهترین
هستند و به صلاح شما
و زندگی تان هستند....
❖
@Tahavol_nab
امـروز دوشنبه چهارم اسفندماه
آرزویم این است که
دلت خوش باشد، نرود
لحظه ای از صورت تو لبخندت
نشود غصّه کمى نزدیکت
لحظه هایت، همه زیبا و قشنگ
❖
@Tahavol_nab
خدایا امروز یکشنبه
سوم اسفند ماه، دلمان
را در جویبار رحمتت چنان
شستشو ده که هر جا
نفرت هست دوستی،
هر جا یاس هست امید،
و هر کجا زخمى هست
درمان، جایش را بگیرد....
❖
@Tahavol_nab
💎 چای خوردن تو این سینی، فقط رفع خستگی نیست؛ تراپیه! ☕️💙
⚪️ ما تو اسمانتیک معتقدیم «زیبایی» نباید فقط برای مهمونهای غریبه باشه. خودت از همه مهمتری!🥰
☕️ چرا عصرونههای خودت و عزیزات نباید توی قشنگترین ظرف خونه سرو بشه؟
⭐ t.me/smantique_gallery ◀️
⭐ t.me/smantique_gallery ◀️
➖➖➖➖➖➖
آخرین سه شنبه ی بهمن
ماهتون پر از نگاه و مهربانی خدا
خداوندا امروز ما را "کمک و یاری
کن" تا در راهی که تو برایمان مقدر
ساخته ای قدم گذاریم و همواره
در فیض و "برکت تو" روزمان
را با "عشق و آرامش" سر کنیم...
" پیشاپیش اسفند ماه مبارک "
❖
@Tahavol_nab
پروردگارا در آخرین جمعه
بهمن ماه، بحق رحمانیتت
غم های ما را بزدای
و "عشق خودت" را در
دل ما جای ده ،که
عشق به غیر از تو ، درد
است و درد است و درد!
خدایا همیشه دلهای ما را،
"در پناه خودت" حفظ بفرما...
❖
@Tahavol_nab
امروز دوشنبه بیستم
بهمن ماه، برای تک تکتون
یک دل شاد، یک لبِ
خندون، یک زندگی اروم
یک کوه سلامتی و شادی
یک دریا خوشبختی
یک اسمان آرزوهای زیبا
و یک عمر با عزت از
پروردگار مهربان خواستارم...
❖
@Tahavol_nab
امروز یکشنبه
دوازدهم بهمن ماه
ناب ترين " دعاهايم "
را بر تار خورشيد
و عرش كبريايى
به وديعه ميگذارم
تا هُمای سعادت بر
زندگی شما دوستان
و عزیزانم لانه کند....
❖
@Tahavol_nab
خدایا تو به جز من بنده های زیادی داری،
ولی من جز تو ربی ندارم پناهم باش...
شب بخیر...
❖
@Tahavol_nab
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khanoomane1111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“👸خانومانه👸ترفند” (@khanoomane1111), 1,851 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khanoomane1111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
