يبوكني ويهددني ويقتلني وبالنهاية لازم اخاف من غيره !!!
👍89❤28😁8

Channel
@khanjgan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,341subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001620858643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khanjgan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khanjgan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 13,341 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 13,347 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 13,347 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,967 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 961 | 48.9% | |
| ❤ | 317 | 16.1% | |
| 🤣 | 151 | 7.68% | |
| 😁 | 116 | 5.90% | |
| 👏 | 111 | 5.64% | |
| 🤮 | 58 | 2.95% | |
| 🥱 | 46 | 2.34% | |
| 👎 | 33 | 1.68% | |
| 😢 | 31 | 1.58% | |
| 🤔 | 30 | 1.53% | |
| 😭 | 26 | 1.32% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 0.864% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 0.813% | |
| 🙉 | 14 | 0.712% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 0.661% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 0.61% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 0.305% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.203% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.203% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.051% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,967reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يبوكني ويهددني ويقتلني وبالنهاية لازم اخاف من غيره !!!
👍89❤28😁8
التلفزيون السويدي: مـ ـقتل سلوان موميكا "حارق القرآن" بـ ـالرصـ ـاص
❤101👏39👍28😁8💔6😢3
هيئة النزاهة وبأمر القاضي ضياء عبد جعفر تعتقل ابرز شخصية داخل حلقة رئيس الجمهورية الضيقة ومنهم سكرتيره الشخصي لقضايا تتعلق بالفساد المالي والإداري لشركة IQ الملوكة إلى ابن الرئيس و قضايا أخرى تتعلق باصدار عفو خاص مقابل مبالغ مالية عدا ان النزاهة تحقق بقضايا داخل اروقة الرئاسة تتعلق بسراء عجلات نوع مارسيدس و سكودا دون الضوابط و ملف السيطرة على ارض السفارة الكويتية داخل المربع الرئاسي . مصادرنا داخل هيئة النزاهة أكدت ا…
❤45👍33😁21🤮4👏3
⭕️ ماهي اجراءات الحكومة حتى الان ؟
👍77😁18❤11🤣9🤮8🗿5
كتب الصحفي مصطفى ناصر : في استعراض التقرير الدوري الشامل لأمم المتحدة، قامت الدول الاعضاء برفع توصيات الى رئيس الجلسة على رأسها ايقاف تنفيذ قانون الاحوال الشخصية وتحديد سن الزواج ب18 عاما. فانبرى وزير العدل خالد شواني وهو عن الاتحاد الكردستاني، المقرب من الحرس الثوري، مدافعا عن هذا القانون بقوله "القانون هذا لا يتيح تزويج القاصرات". في هذا الاستعراض طرحت الدول الاعضاء مجموعة توصيات ابرزها: - ضمان حرية التعبير و…
👍56🤮18❤6
فضيحة تضرب البرلمان العراقي بعد التصويت على قوانين السلة الواحدة.
👍72❤21🙉7🤮6😡1
⭕️ فيديو: جمع تواقيع في البرلمان لإقالة المشهداني ونائبيه إثر تمرير القوانين الخلافية الثلاثة بسلة واحدة
🤣73👍18👌11🤮6❤5
⭕️ النائبة عالية نصيف : اليوم يوم فرح لـ "نور زهير وهيثم الجبوري" بأقرار قانون العفو العام الذي سيشملهم
👍27🤣19😱7🤡6❤2😁1
⭕️ 5 أشخاص بسبب انفجار كدس للعتاد وإصابة ثمانية أشخاص بجروح خطيرة في قضاء الطارمية ببغداد وهم ١.المقدم عبدالله بشير عبدالله ٢.العقيد مهند علي ٣.نقيب يونارد نهير فاضل ٤.الجندي رسول جواد كاظم ٥.هشام حسن عبيد ⭕️ المصابون جراء انفجار الكدس ١.محمد مزهر ٢.حسين حسن ضيدان ٣.عامر مروان أحمد ٤.علي محمود حميد ٥.جعفر منصور عبد سالم ٦.محمد عطوان صلبوخ ٧.عبدالله برع خليفة ٨.حيدر مكي جاسم
😭26😢12👍11❤4🤔1
⭕️ خطأ فني خارج السياقات المعتمدة أدى إلى انفجار كدس واستشهاد 3 ضباط وإصابة 4 من المراتب في الطارمية
🤔13😢7👍3
⭕️ مكافحة اجرام الأنبار تحرر مختطفة وتلقي القبض على الخاطفين وسط مدينة الفلوجة .
🤔13👍5👏3
⭕️ العراق لايزال ضمن (المنطقة الحمراء) التي تصنفها بريطانيا كدول الخطرة، ولم يتم رفعه بشكل كامل من هذه القائمة، على عكس ماصرح به بعض الرسميين العراقيين! ⭕️ لاتزال الكثير من المدن والمحافظات عراقية تحت القائمة الحمراء والمصنفة كمناطق خطرة بريطانياً وليس مسموحاً الذهاب اليها تحت كل الظروف، كما هو واضح في الخارطة! ⭕️ المثير للانتباه، ان بريطانيا رفعت أجزاء كبيرة من بغداد من قائمتها الحمراء الخطرة، لكنها أبقت (مدينة …
👍48😁12❤10🥱5👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khanjgan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خان جغان” (@khanjgan), 13,341 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khanjgan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.