Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خانه رشد|🏡

Channel

خانه رشد|🏡

@khaneyeroshd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,586subscribers

-338 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002074293321
TypeChannel
Username@khaneyeroshd
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khaneyeroshd

Growth

3,5863,9243,7556 August 2026 — 3,924 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,919 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,913 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,897 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,638 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,631 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,617 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,605 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,586 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -338. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,535–3,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 15:333,586-19
26 Aug 2026, 06:063,605-12
23 Aug 2026, 12:573,617-14
19 Aug 2026, 22:343,631-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:353,638-259
13 Aug 2026, 03:443,897-16
10 Aug 2026, 05:113,913-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:453,919-5
6 Aug 2026, 08:313,924no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:233,924first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.83%
avg views ÷ 3,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
137
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.986%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held30 (27 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,747
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1058.8%
👍529.4%
🥰211.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📖 مجله شماره ۴ | گفتاردرمانی*💚 توی این شماره می‌خونید: 🔹 چه علائمی نشون‌دهنده‌ی تأخیر واقعی در گفتار کودکه؟ 🔹 چرا ارزیابی و مداخله‌ی زودهنگام این‌قدر مهمه؟ 🔹 چه اشتباهات رایجی ممکنه روند رشد زبانی کودک رو کندتر کنه؟ 🔹 والدین چطور می‌تونن هر روز، با کارهای ساده، به گفتار کودک کمک کنن؟ 🌱 امیدواریم این شماره کمک کنه با نگاهی آگاهانه‌تر و بدون نگرانی بی‌مورد، مسیر رشد گفتار کودکتون رو دنبال کنید. 💚 اگه این مجله براتون

1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تاحالا شده با خودت بگی : ❓چرا کودکم هنوز حرف نمی‌زنه؟ ❓نکنه از هم‌سن‌وسال‌هاش عقب‌تره؟ 🤔 📌وقتی کودک دیرتر شروع به حرف زدن می‌کنه، معمولاً سؤال‌های زیادی توی ذهن مامان و بابا شکل می‌گیره؛ ✋🏻 اما دیر حرف زدن همیشه فقط به تعداد کلمه‌هایی که کودک می‌گه خلاصه نمی‌شه. 📌توی این شماره، به زبان ساده درباره‌ی دلایل اینکه چرا بعضی کودکان دیرتر حرف می‌زنن و چیزهایی که در رشد گفتار و زبانشون باید بررسی بشه صحبت کردیم. ⏳ تا کمت

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📖 مجله شماره ۴ | رفتاردرمانی کودک 💚 تا حالا شده بعد از جلسه‌ی درمان، اولین سوالتون از کودک این باشه: «چی گفتی؟ چیکار کردید؟» 🤔 «چرا نمی‌ذارن منم توی جلسه باشم؟» «مگه میشه ندونم چه اتفاقی داخل اتاق افتاده؟» توی این شماره می‌خونید: 🔹 چرا اتاق درمان باید حریم شخصی کودک باشه؟ 🔹 اصرار بر حضور همزمان چه آسیبی به رابطه‌ی درمانی می‌زنه؟ 🔹 چه اشتباهاتی اعتماد کودک به درمانگر رو از بین می‌بره؟ 🔹 والدین چطور می‌تونن بدون ورو

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تا حالا شده وقتی کودکتون وارد اتاق درمان یا جلسه درمان می‌شه، با خودتون فکر کنید: ❓آیا والدین باید از تمام صحبت‌های کودک در اتاق درمان باخبر باشن؟ ❓آیا لازمه کودک همه ی حرف ها و اتفاقات جلسه رو با من در میون بذاره ؟ سؤال ساده‌ایه، اما جوابش شاید اون چیزی نباشه که فکر می‌کنیم. 🤔 📌وقتی پای کودک درمیونه، طبیعیه که دلمون بخواد بدونیم توی جلسه چه می‌گذره و چطور می‌تونیم بیشتر بهش کمک کنیم. ✋🏻 اما در کنار این دغدغه، حس ا

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026

جمعه تون بخیر🌱 📝طبق قرار، هر هفته براتون یک شماره مجله آموزشی داریم ✔️موضوعات این هفته : 🧠رفتاردرمانی : اتاق درمان ؛ فضای امن کودک یا اتاق گزارش دهی به والدین؟ 🗣 گفتاردرمانی : چرا کودک من حرف نمیزند؟ ببینیم مجله اول هفته چی برامون داره 👇🏻

6 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

فلش کارت های چون و چرا رو میتونید توی سه نسخه داشته باشید : 🎁 نسخه دمو رایگان: ۱۰۰ سؤال «چرا» بدون تصویر 📘 نسخه متنی کامل: ۲۰۰ سؤال «چرا» بدون تصویر 🖼 نسخه تصویری کامل: ۱۱۰ فلش‌کارت تصویری اختصاصی برای دریافت نسخه دمو و تهیه نسخه های کامل تر این محصول کافیه کلمه “چرا” رو زیر همین پست کامنت کنی و یا به این آیدی پیام بدی🌱: @khaneye_roshd اگه مامانی میشناسی که این محصول میتونن کمکش کنه این پست رو براش بفرست 💚✋🏻

1

6 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

همین سؤال‌های ساده، کم‌کم به کودک کمک می‌کنن: 📌برای حرف‌هاش دلیل بیاره. 📌راحت‌تر درباره چیزی که توی ذهنش می‌گذره صحبت کنه. 📌 ارتباط بین اتفاق‌ها رو بهتر متوجه بشه. همین تمرین‌های کوچیک، می‌تونن پایه خیلی از یادگیری‌های بعدی باشن. 🌱

6 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

شامل سؤال‌هایی مثل… 👦 چرا علی کنار پنجره ایستاده؟ 🍲 چرا مامان داره غذا رو هم می‌زنه؟ 🚗 چرا حامد از دیدن ماشین تعجب کرده؟ ✔️ اینجا قرار نیست فقط یه جواب درست پیدا بشه… قرارِ کودک فکر کنه، حدس بزنه و برای جوابش دلیل بیاره✨

6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚 فلش‌کارت‌های «چون و چرا»پر از سؤال‌هاییه که کودک رو به فکر کردن دعوت می‌کنه 🧠 سؤال‌هایی که کمکش می‌کنن برای جوابش دلیل بیاره ، حدس بزنه و درباره چیزی که توی ذهنش می‌گذره حرف بزنه. گاهی فقط یک سؤال خوب، می‌تونه شروع یک گفت‌وگوی قشنگ بین شما و کوچولوتون باشه. 🌱

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026

🤔 تا حالا از کوچولوتون پرسیدین: به نظرت چرا این اتفاق افتاده؟ یا ازش بپرسین چی شده ؟ شاید خیلی وقت‌ها کودکتون فقط بگه نمی‌دونم🤷🏻‍♀ … ✋🏻نه اینکه بلد نباشه؛شاید فقط کمتر فرصتکرده درباره جوابش فکر کنه و برای چیزی که می‌گه، دلیل بیاره. 🔺به همین خاطر، توی آکادمی خانه رشد همیشه سعی می‌کنیم ابزارها و منابع آموزشی‌ای رو ارائه بدیم که بشه این مهارت‌ها رو توی خونه هم تقویت کرد. یکی از اون‌ها رو امروز بهتون معرفی میکنیم 👇

5 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💚 از آقای امیر صلاحی عزیز گفتاردرمانگر خانه رشد بابت همراهی و پاسخ به سؤال‌های پرتکرار والدین صمیمانه سپاسگزاریم. اگر دوست داری بیشتر با ایشون آشنا بشی، می‌تونی از طریق لینک زیر صفحه اختصاصی‌شون رو در اپلیکیشن خانه رشد ببینی: 🔗 https://khaneyeroshd.app/path/amir-salahi 🏡| @khaneyeroshd

1

5 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC156 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

❓ آیا برای کمک گرفتن از گفتاردرمانی ممکنه دیر شده باشه؟ 📌 خیلی از والدین وقتی متوجه می‌شن کودک‌شون در حرف زدن عقب‌تره، این سؤال به ذهنشون میاد… نکنه دیگه دیر شده باشه؟ 📌 اما آیا واقعاً برای شروع کمک گرفتن یک زمان از دست‌رفته وجود داره؟ 🎙️ توی این وویس، درمانگر درباره بهترین زمان برای بررسی وضعیت کودک، اهمیت اقدام به‌موقع و اینکه چرا شروع زودتر همیشه به معنی درمان بیشتر نیست، صحبت می‌کنه. 🏡| @khaneyeroshd

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @khaneyeroshd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,469,186 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خانه رشد|🏡” (@khaneyeroshd), 3,586 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khaneyeroshd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.