Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خمسة شرعي 🤍

Channel

خمسة شرعي 🤍

@khamsasharey5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,331subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001434148580
TypeChannel
Username@khamsasharey5
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khamsasharey5

Growth

7,3317,3617,3468 August 2026 — 7,361 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,361 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,360 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,340 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,331 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,327–7,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:347,331-9
12 Aug 2026, 06:427,340-20
9 Aug 2026, 09:117,360-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:307,361no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:177,361first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.53%
avg views ÷ 7,331 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (18 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total1,036
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC262 viewsread 12 August 2026

وهمّ الأمة عظيم، أثقل قلبي.. والشعور بالذنب والتقصير اشتد عليٌ.. - صلي على النبي، يُكفى همك ويُغفر ذنبك بإذن الله اللهم انصر إخواننا المستضعفين في كل مكان ويسرلنا وأعنا على المشاركة في كل خير يا كريم

24 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC258 viewsread 12 August 2026

لَو صلّىٰ العبد على النبي ﷺ بِعَدَد أنفاسه لم يكن موفّيا لِحقِّه! -ابن القيّم.

24 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC258 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏"أحب كثرة الصلاة على النبي عليه الصلاة والسلام في كل حال، وأنا في يوم الجمعة وليلتها أشدّ استحبابًا" -الإمام الشافعي.

24 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC258 viewsread 12 August 2026

شمسُ الخميس إذا تغيب، فزد من الصلاة على الحبيب🤍 عارف يعني إيه النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم بنفسه يوصيك إنك تصلى عليه يوم الجمعة! لا ويحفزك بإن صلاتك معروضة عليه (فأكْثِروا عليَّ منَ الصَّلاةِ فإنَّ صلاتَكُم معروضةٌ عليَّ..) كيف تُعرِض!

16 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC550 viewsread 12 August 2026

الجروب ليه شرط انضمام واحد سهل جدا، ابعتيلي هنا عشان ابعتلك الشرط 🤍 https://wa.me/+201283473462

16 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC516 viewsread 12 August 2026

بسم الله، ليالي الخميس ونيسة، وكل أنسها في كلام رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم 🤍 نبدأ إن شاء الله تعالى مشروعنا الصغنون في بناء عادة قراءة حديث رسولنا يوميا 🤍 هنعمل جروب نقرأ فيه الأحاديث، هنقسم ورد الأسبوع على عدد الطالبات ف الجروب وكل واحدة تسجل وتبعت على الجروب وهيبقى مطلوب منها تسمع قراءات إخواتها مش هنحفظ، مش هناخد إجازة، مش هنعمل أي حاجة غير القراءة وبناء عادة قراءة كلام رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يومياااا و

11 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC605 viewsread 12 August 2026

اقرأو البوست كويس جدا، وانتظرو مفاجأتنا قريبا بإذن الله 🤍

11 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC635 viewsread 12 August 2026

وأخيرا .. لو مش معك الكتب دة مش سبب لعدم البدء بالنسبة دي قراءة الكتب عن طريق التطبيقات أيسر كثيرا من نسخة الـ PDF النسخ دي مريحة جدا في التعامل تقدر تكتب ملاحظات فيها وتبحث ع الحديث بسهولة وإضافة الحديث أو الباب إلي المفضلة دي نسخة صحيح البخاري وهتلاقي شبهها لبقية الكتب http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.reda.sahihbukhari

11 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC551 viewsread 12 August 2026

ومن الحاجات الي بتعين إن شاء الله على الانتظام في هذا الأمر: - تسجيل القراءة صوتيا .. ف تقدر تتابع أخطاءك وتراجعها أو تعرضها على حد مُجاز في القراءة يجيزك ويفيدك في هذا الأمر - تقسيم الكتاب على مجموعة ، اختار صحبة تقدر تعمل معها كدة وقسم الورد عليكم بدل ما تقرأ ف اليوم ١٠٠ حديث اقرأ ٥٠ واسمع ورد صاحبك الـ ٥٠ الباقيين - سماع الحديث برضه مهم جدا ، كتب السنة متسجلة صوتي هتلاقيها يوتيوب أو تليجرام ، هتساعدك على القراءة ف

11 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC474 viewsread 12 August 2026

نصيحة وتنويه في نفس الوقت:- *ما تقرأش كتب السنن الأربعة علي الأقل منغير تحقيق ، أنه يتكتب جنب الحديث هو صحيح ولا حسن ولا ضعيف .. وآه في أحاديث ضعيفة فيهم لكن نسبتها للصحيح قليلة لكن موجودة .. ف عشان ما تحسش إن في تعارض أو تستند لحديث ضعيف اقرأ نسخة تكون محققة * الخلاف مش موجود من أول الأئمة الأربعة فقط ، في خلاف بين الصحابة والتابعين عادي، دة عشان اختلاف الروايات وغيره .. ف ممكن تتلغبط شوية خصوصا في أبواب الفقه .

11 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC545 viewsread 12 August 2026

- طيب بالنسبة لشرح الحديث .. فكرة إن فتح الباري في شرح صحيح البخاري حاجة وعشرين مجلد دي صدمة بالنسبالي، وكل ما أدخل ع أي بلاي ليست لشرح كتاب منهم برضه عدد المحاضرات كبير جدا شرح الحديث متدرج على مرحلتين ١) تدرج الكتب، أبدا بالأيسر والأجمع والأقصر الأربعين النووية ثم مثلا رياض الصالحين مع دراسة الفقه الميسر (وحفظ الأحاديث برضه بنفس التدرج) ٢) تدرج في شرح الكتاب الواحد .. في مختصر للكتب دي وفي شرح للمختصر ، ف تدرج في

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khamsasharey5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 848,292 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خمسة شرعي 🤍” (@khamsasharey5), 7,331 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khamsasharey5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.