Channel
@khaleedranch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,337subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001392516370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khaleedranch |
| Created | 24 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khaleedranch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 1,337 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 1,336 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,336 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
174 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 44 | 25.3% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 23.6% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 12.1% | |
| 😍 | 20 | 11.5% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 9.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.02% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Зря вы дядьМарата ругаете. Я тоже ругаю. Но его отдельные взгляды и субъективно-объективное. А в целом, возможно это будет всего один из двух!!! положительных персонажей наделенных рупором. И пока у него не появится двухсотка - можно читать спокойно
😁2🤬1🥱1
Не ждите у меня на площадках однородный контент и попсовые позиции. Для стерильности есть операционные. Тут скорее лавка мясника. Рублю и режу как хочу и что хочу. Могу обвесить тоже. Тут все для драйва. (Моего) и вас, таких же нетипичных как я. И да - спасибо что вы со мной.
👍10🔥5❤1🥱1😍1
По братски! Кто ставит влюбленный смайлик (😍) под всеми публикациями?😁
😍5❤🔥3🥰3👍2🤣2🥱1
А это, мне кажется еще один взгляд на тему озвученную в моем вчерашнем посте. Возможно несколько обвинительная риторика, но это тоже норм. В моем тексте она тоже несомненно присутствует. Однако у дяди Марата весы хотя бы качаются.👍 https://t.me/luguev1/3445
❤🔥2😍2❤1👍1🔥1🤣1🥱1
Это вид из обычной, даже сказал бы дешевой (по форме а не по духу) кафешки в Дагестане. Кухня, кстати, тут подстать видам. В простой посуде и на клеенчатой скатерти, но вкуснее чем в большинстве ресторанов мира
👍9😍7❤3❤🔥2
Читаю новости: на днях неадекватный ранил двух врачей в больнице. Отойду от тематики странички. Молодой парень, под психотропами (так говорят), по непонятной причине набросился на медиков. Разделю мысли на несколько частей. 🔴 Первое - сам поступок. Здесь без вариантов: только осуждение. Никакого понимания. Что у него в голове - не знаю. Это незаконно, бесчеловечно и недопустимо. (Хотя понимаю, иногда очень хочетс…
👍6🔥1😍1
Мир состоит не только из черного, белого и круглого. И горизонты гораздо дальше чем их видят ваши глаза, зрение которых подсажено телефонами. А я все также провожу лучшие туры по Северному Кавказу. В частности- по Дагестану. У нас всегда все честно: или Вы попали ко мне в тур, или ты лох) Обратный отсчет пошел.
👍6😍4🔥3❤1🥱1
Но я думаю скоро догоним. И будет литров 5 на душу. Алкоголь, его употребление и демонстрация потихоньку перестает быть чем-то постыдным для дагестанцев. https://t.me/koddagestantsa/2665
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
Выходные тоже должны быть друзья. А тут - или дома на диване, или на лошади в седле… Ну и (самое вероятное) на байке с друзьями
🔥8
Это чтоб знали, что в пропустили)
👍2🔥1
Удивленные гости. Наводнения. Стадное чувство. Что случится с туризмом в Дагестане? Взгляд изнутри, без диванных экспертов Итоги стихийного бедствия моими глазами, с «полей» туризма.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @khaleedranch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 575,168 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KHALEEDRANCH туры по Дагестану и Северному Кавказу” (@khaleedranch), 1,337 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khaleedranch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.