🎤 ایوان بند 🎼 شاهکار 🎶 @khabareshahriar 🎶

Channel
خبر شهریار( فردوسیه)
@khabareshahriar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,463subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001070552337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khabareshahriar |
| Description | "📰 خبرشهریار| صدای شهریار و ایران 📡 پوشش اخبار روز، فرهنگ، ورزش و رویدادهای محلی 🎥 ویدیوهای جذاب و گزارشهای اختصاصی 🗳 با مجوز رسمی از وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد 👉 https://khabarshahryar.ir 📩 DM @ferdosiyeadmin https://www.instagram.com/ferdosiyeh_news/ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khabareshahriar |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 7,463 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 7,458 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 7,447 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 7,448 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 7,453 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 7,440 | +5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 7,435 | +3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 7,432 | -8 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 19:35 | 7,440 | -5 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 7,445 | -21 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 7,466 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 7,472 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 7,475 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 7,474 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 7,473 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 7,474 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 7,487 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 7,490 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 7,495 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 7,493 | first reading |
Engagement
269 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.6%
- avg views ÷ 7,463 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 868
- 107 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.638%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 107
- of 269 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 86 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 269 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 92,910 |
| Reactions total | 497 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈61,400
- Videos
- ≈6,880
- Links
- ≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 03m
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,405 reactions across 214 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 616 | 43.8% | |
| 👍 | 389 | 27.7% | |
| 👎 | 302 | 21.5% | |
| 👏 | 71 | 5.05% | |
| 👌 | 27 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 225 of the 269 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,471 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 67 of 107 posts held from the last 30 days (62.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#پیام_شهروند سلام وقت بخیر ممنون بابت کانال خوبتون خیایان دکتر حسابی کوچه شیخ بهایی چند وقت پیش اداره آب اومده و یه قسمت از کوچه رو کنده کل کوچه کنده کاری شده و بارون ک اومده همش نشست کرده و گل شده ممنون میشم پیگیری کنید و به مسئولین مربوطه بگید که رسیدگی کنند ممنون
اجرای عملیات تراش و آسفالت مکانیزه خیابان دانش عبدآباد عملیات تراش و روکش آسفالت خیابان دانش در محله عبدآباد با استفاده از تجهیزات مکانیزه و دستگاه فینیشر در حال اجراست. به گزارش روابط عمومی شهرداری فردوسیه، مهندس مصطفی عموزاده شهردار فردوسیه با اشاره به تداوم اقدامات عمرانی و بهسازی معابر شهری اظهار کرد: در ادامه برنامههای شهرداری برای ارتقای کیفیت معابر و تسهیل در تردد شهروندان، عملیات تراش آسفالت فرسوده خیابان…
Photo, posted without a caption
جاده امامزاده داوود دهن باز کرده و بعد بارونهای این دو روزه یه رانش اساسی داشته واقعا خدا رحم کرد کسی چیزیش نشده @khabareshahriar
بارشهای پاییزی فراتر از نرمال، اما خشکسالی همچنان پابرجاست / کاهش محسوس دمای تهران از سهشنبه / بارندگیهای اخیر فقط کار النینو نیست احد وظیفه رئیس مرکز ملی خشکسالی، با اشاره به نقش النینو و سامانههای مدیترانهای در بارندگیهای اخیر، از احتمال پربارشتر بودن پاییز امسال نسبت به میانگین بلندمدت خبر داد و گفت: بارندگیهای اخیر ناشی از همکاری جریانهای مدیترانهای با رطوبت ایجاد شده توسط پدیده النینو در اقیانوس است.…
👎4❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
♦️تصویر واضحی از برج آرامکو در ریاض پس از حمله تلافیجویانه یمن 🆔 @khabareshahriar
👍3
اگه نرسیدید اخبار امروز رو بخونید، خیلی خلاصه بگم خبر خاصی نبوده جز اخبار مذاکره و درگیریهای شبانه تو جنوب و تنگه هرمز @khabareshahriar
قاتل کارگر شهرداری با بخشش خانواده مقتول از اعدام نجات یافت 🔹پدر و مادر جوانی که در یک درگیری خیابانی جان خود را از دست داده بود، با بخشش قاتل فرزندشان، او را که دو بار تا پای چوبه دار رفته بود، به زندگی بازگرداندند. 🔹پرونده قصاص این قاتل با دریافت دیه بسته شد، اما محکوم به مرگ نجاتیافته از جنبه عمومی جرم پای میز محاکمه خواهد رفت. 🔹ماجرای این قتل که محکوم را سه بار پای چوبه دار و تا چندقدمی مرگ برد، از یک نزاع مرگب…
❤3
📰 #روزنامههای_ورزشی امروز دوشنبه ۱۸ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵ ➡️@khabareshahriar
📰صفحه نخست روزنامههای دوشنبه ۱۸ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵ ➡️@khabareshahriar
Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @khabareshahriar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@khabareshahriar named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hzrjvbi · 21,372
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
@negin_news · 30,186
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@hantv · 54,945
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
@asadi_prime · 61,915
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبر شهریار( فردوسیه)” (@khabareshahriar), 7,463 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khabareshahriar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.