Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KG.UA| Кременчуцька газета

Channel

KG.UA| Кременчуцька газета

@kgua_news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,552subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275254492
TypeChannel
Username@kgua_news
Created27 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kgua_news

Growth

7,5397,5527,545.56 August 2026 — 7,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,539 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,546 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,552 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,537–7,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:247,552+6
13 Aug 2026, 04:567,546+7
6 Aug 2026, 21:187,539-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:317,541first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 7,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
120 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.653%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
120
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 120 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held120 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total121,188
Reactions total607
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

607 reactions across 84 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢26543.7%
6510.7%
😁579.39%
👎487.91%
🤯487.91%
🤔406.59%
😱345.60%
👍223.62%
👏162.64%
🙏101.65%
🔥20.329%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 607reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC157 viewsread 12 August 2026

Швидкість, стиль і трохи мирного життя: як Кременчук зустрічав KYIV CAR FEST Посилання на новину

12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC484 viewsread 12 August 2026

Завтра 13 серпня: свята, народні прикмети Посилання на новину

12 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC607 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Магнітні бурі, прогноз на три дні: чого очікувати від сонячної активності 13–15 серпня Посилання на новину

1

12 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC663 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Парад планет під час затемнення: на нас чекає астрономічне комбо, яке трапляється раз на життя Посилання на новину

🤔3

12 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC701 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Собака вкусив кременчуківку, але її господаря не покарали: названа причина Посилання на новину

🤯5

12 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не панікуйте: у трьох районах Кременчука 14 серпня тестуватимуть сирени Посилання на новину

🤔4

12 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC805 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Все, що я зробила, з великою вдячністю дарую цьому місту»: художниця-переселенка передала Кременчуцькому музею 85 картин Посилання на новину

😱2

12 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC821 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Змінив прізвище та отримав «батька»: у справі неповнолітнього з Кременчуцької колонії розслідують незаконний виїзд за кордон Посилання на новину

🤯21😁1

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC849 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Пані Усанова! Ви ж для нас — своя, рідна»: сусіди вимагають від в.о. мера навести лад біля будинку її рідних Посилання на новину

🤔2😁2🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC883 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У Кременчуці сьогодні відбудеться автомобільний фестиваль: на площі Перемоги вже ведуть підготовку Посилання на новину

🤔7👎2

12 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC891 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пасажири поїздів можуть замовити книгу при оформленні квитка й отримати її у вагоні Посилання на новину

2😁1

12 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC920 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Без їжі та води: у Кременчуцькому районі рятують трьох маленьких білченят Посилання на новину

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @kgua_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 377,108 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Х Кременчук
@h_kremenchug · 137,601
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Труха⚡️Кременчук
@kremenchugtruexa · 102,780
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KG.UA| Кременчуцька газета” (@kgua_news), 7,552 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kgua_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.