JG Chemicals Ltd - Update 👉 Still holding 👉 Without any worries
👍3

Channel
@keystonesecurities
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,024subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001994793139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keystonesecurities |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keystonesecurities |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 1,024 | +15 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 11:22 | 1,009 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 September 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 5,092 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
31 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 54.8% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 38.7% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JG Chemicals Ltd - Update 👉 Still holding 👉 Without any worries
👍3
Nifty | Update 👉 Another brutal fall today 👉 Finally touched 200-DMA after 6 years Feels like the worst of the selling may be behind us, stay sharp
JG Chemicals Ltd - BTST 🔥 👉 Will close around 2% Gains 👉 Let's Keep holding this without worries
👍2
JG Chemicals Ltd - BTST 🔥 👉 4.5% Gains & running 👉 Let’s see if the momentum holds 👉 Chemical sector is heating up as well
🔥4
JG Chemicals - BTST 👉 Buy around ₹656 & hold 👉 Standing strong despite the weak market 👉 Healthy volumes + EMA consolidation breakout 👉 Will hold this for the next few days with a standard 3-4% SL
🔥5
With all this, things are quite simple 👉 Not to touch large-caps 👉 Opportunities will continue in SMIDs To push the portfolio in this difficult phase We need to work carefully by minting big gains & short losses, without buying daily & trying daily
👍2
Nifty Smallcap 100 - Index Review Market Setup 👉 Now trading abv 50, 100 & 200 EMA 👉 Long-term trend remains intact Valuation Metrics 👉 Current PE - 31.2x 👉 Mar 2025 PE - 25x 👉 Mar 2026 PE - 25.9x Key Supports > 1st Support - 18,900 > 2nd Support - 18,500 Small-caps remain strong, but volatility may continue, nothing to worry
Nifty Midcap 100 - Index View Market Setup 👉 Now trading below 50 EMA 👉 Still above 100 & 200 EMA 👉 763 days - Net return 0% 👉 Current PE: 29.4x Key Supports > 1st Support: 59,000 > 2nd Support: 57,000 Long-term trend is still intact, but short-term correction is underway
👍1
Nifty 50 - Index Review 👉 Down 14% from ATH 👉 860 Days - Net returns is 0% 👉 In weekly TF it's trading below 50 & 100 MA & abv 200 EMA Valuations Metrics - 👉 Current PE -19.5x PE 👉 It's the Lowest PE in 4 years 👉 In Covid Bottomed out 17.2x PE Nifty comes near its 200 EMA only rarely & this could be such phase Heavy accumulation zone around 22,300 with / +-500
👍1
Let's do Index Reviews today 👉 With a focus on fundamentals 👉 For identifying buying zones & potential bottoms
👍3
Nifty | Update 👉 Back to 23,100 once again 👉 LargeCaps are facing brutal heat 👉 For the last 2 years, LargeCaps are facing heat 👉 Better to avoid touching them until the trend improves
Selling is Brutal Every Index is down 2-3% We expect things to settle in next 48 Hrs
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @keystonesecurities. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Keystone Securities” (@keystonesecurities), 1,024 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keystonesecurities.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.