Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В Городе Фриков | Кэтрин Киста²

Channel

В Городе Фриков | Кэтрин Киста²

@ketrincyst

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,332subscribers

-122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941476615
TypeChannel
Username@ketrincyst
Description🎬 YT— youtube.com/@KetrinCyst 🎮 Twitch — twitch.tv/ketrincyst 🔒 Эксклюзив — boosty.to/ketrincyst 💸 Поддержать — dalink.to/ketrincyst 🔑 Подписки,ключи,игры: https://shield.market?ref=ketrincyst ❗️По вопросам рекламы в ЛС ТГК Помощь❓ @Freak_City_Maste
Created18 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ketrincyst

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3027,4547,3786 August 2026 — 7,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,454 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,444 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,451 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,454 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,448 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,442 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,420 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,408 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,393 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,387 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,369 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,353 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,347 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,333 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,315 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,327 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,317 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,312 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,302 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,304 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,303 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,323 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,332 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,329 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,332 subscribers7,3326 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,279–7,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:497,332+3
5 Nov 2026, 08:097,329-3
2 Nov 2026, 17:157,332+9
31 Oct 2026, 03:307,323+20
28 Oct 2026, 11:297,303-1
25 Oct 2026, 21:587,304+2
23 Oct 2026, 01:487,302-10
19 Oct 2026, 18:387,312-5
17 Oct 2026, 04:197,317-10
14 Oct 2026, 10:387,327+12
10 Oct 2026, 23:177,315-18
25 Sept 2026, 09:377,333-14
15 Sept 2026, 17:187,347-6
12 Sept 2026, 00:407,353-16
7 Sept 2026, 12:207,369-18
2 Sept 2026, 12:147,387-6
30 Aug 2026, 18:587,393-15
28 Aug 2026, 05:247,408-12
24 Aug 2026, 18:547,420-22
21 Aug 2026, 03:167,442first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.2%
avg views ÷ 7,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held68 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total56,956
Reactions total4,568
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,260
Videos
≈88
Links
≈418

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,483 reactions across 68 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,72652.9%
custom 58371034914991702672,26713.8%
❤‍🔥1,4238.63%
🔥1,4078.54%
custom 53684694006953511611,1456.95%
custom 52762344840925245467504.55%
😭3822.32%
🖕1330.807%
🤯850.516%
👍590.358%
😨440.267%
🦄340.206%
😈180.109%
👎100.061%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 68 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ketrincyst. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 22:14 UTC876 views158 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @V_Arisha_VPhoto

Хай, хорошие мои! Я считаю, что после чего-то тёплого нужно поесть немного стекла, хехехе) Давно я ничего не публиковала, извиняюсь за это, тяжело совмещать учёбу и рисование. В этом месяце постараюсь выложить ещё два комикса! #KetrinCyst #SecB

custom 527623448409252454697custom 583710349149917026734custom 536846940069535116113❤6🔥6🖕2

9 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC≈1,880 views196 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ночной уютный стрим с: А ещё у меня есть новая книжка со сказочками!! Так что приходите, поторчим ёмаё 🙂 ⬇️ 📱 THE STREAM IS HERE 📱 THE STREAM IS HERE Автор рисунка⬅️

❤151🔥21custom 583710349149917026712custom 52762344840925245467custom 53684694006953511613👍2

6 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,910 views266 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @ItelNextPhoto

#MineShield #KetrinCyst Что-то я разошлась

❤210custom 583710349149917026722custom 536846940069535116115🔥10custom 52762344840925245467👍1🖕1

3 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈3,550 views211 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Выглядит и звучит странновато, но сойдёт Круто что у нас дополнительные вариации белых блоков, круто что это именно кальцит ибо его оттенок бесподобен, но ебучая реализация.. Каждый новый блок в майнкрафте это текстура из кэндикраш, всё вылизанное и сглаженное и какое-то детское что-ли Я хз. И вот в сочетании с той же берёзой выглядит так как будто что-то из очень разных вселенных. Мне не комфортно от этого. Меняйте…

❤157custom 583710349149917026725🔥13custom 52762344840925245466custom 53684694006953511615👎3👍1🖕1

1 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC≈3,080 views256 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @VALL_VlPhoto

некие новости: • я победила Clip Studio и нашла нормальную пиратку • решила перерисовать древний арт с кэт • думаю над созданием щитпоста, но в сомнениях: а точно ли оно мне нужно • а ну и я теперь двоюродная тетка, месяц буду в родном городе без нормального интернета новости всё 🫲🌚🫱 #гифт #редрав

❤201custom 527623448409252454618😭15custom 58371034914991702678custom 53684694006953511617🔥5🖕2

31 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈3,640 views262 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Жуткого Вам Хэллоуина <Х

❤195custom 583710349149917026739🔥15custom 53684694006953511619😈3🖕1

30 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC≈4,180 views314 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Мы дома!

❤241🔥35custom 583710349149917026728custom 53684694006953511619🖕1

30 Oct 2026, 17:58 UTC≈4,240 views241 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ща хранители будут пенетрацию дырочек на разных остравах делать

custom 5276234484092524546161❤30custom 536846940069535116129custom 583710349149917026713🔥7🖕1

30 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈3,830 views270 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Что-то мутят эти Ваши МаШмИлDоВцЫ 🟨

❤201custom 583710349149917026740🔥18custom 53684694006953511615custom 52762344840925245464🖕2

29 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈3,140 views181 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @gelmoPhoto

👑 История Моего Правления ИМПЕРИЕЙ на Майнкрафт Сервере Aааааа наконец-то видос готов!! Rабота завершена!!! Cамое время зачилиться... 🧿 youtu.be/TpKLD__fSnA

❤154🔥16custom 53684694006953511615🖕3custom 58371034914991702673

29 Oct 2026, 16:18 UTC≈3,160 views290 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Помните историю с песком и с человеком, который давал мне поручения? Так вот, сегодня Я получил новое сообщение от этого человека. И он поменял название нашей беседы, а так же аватарку на синий василёк. Боже, как же читалось, вычислил в мгновение :D (Я давал Секби намёк в туннелях) Ну и да, не утруждайте себя расшифровкой. Это шифр Виженера, ключом к которому был как раз ВаСиЛёК🤩 Гражданам Верстанской Империи. Спа…

❤225custom 583710349149917026736🔥22custom 53684694006953511616🖕1

28 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC≈3,300 views288 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @DushnilnayaaPhoto

кто такая эта ваша композиция

❤222custom 583710349149917026729🦄16custom 52762344840925245467custom 53684694006953511617🔥4🖕2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @ketrincyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ketrincyst edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Просто Секби - SecB 🐍
@secb_here · 21,705
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 21 September 2026
Пещера Джаста | Just_S
@justs_js · 18,862
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 3 October 2026
Санчез
@sanhezoff · 23,231
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 September 2026
Dushenka
@DushenkaTG · 19,940
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 October 2026
MoDDyChat Channel
@moddychat · 19,387
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В Городе Фриков | Кэтрин Киста²” (@ketrincyst), 7,332 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketrincyst.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.