Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کتاب خوانی دانشکده روانشناسی 📚

@ketabi_am

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,797subscribers

+154 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725050729
TypeChannel
Username@ketabi_am
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ketabi_am

Growth

2,6432,7972,7207 August 2026 — 2,643 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,684 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,748 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,797 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,620–2,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:492,797+49
11 Aug 2026, 00:012,748+64
7 Aug 2026, 20:362,684+41
7 Aug 2026, 00:472,643first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 2,797 subscribers
Avg views / post
517
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.928%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,341
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4142.7%
❤‍🔥3536.5%
👌99.38%
👍55.21%
💯22.08%
🥰22.08%
👏11.04%
😍11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC218 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کارگاه #تحلیل_فیلم #طعم_گیلاس 🟡حداکثر ظرفیت: 100 نفر 🟢تعداد ثبت نامی: 100 نفر ⭐️ ظرفیت کارگاه تحلیل فیلم تکمیل شد. سپاس از استقبال فوق العاده تون 💐 🟥زمان کارگاه: فردا جمعه ۱۶ مرداد ساعت ۲۰🆗 〽️عزیزانی که ثبت نام کردید در گروه مربوطه اد شدین. موارد رو مطالعه بفرمایید. لینک ورود به کلاس رو هم اونجا خدمتتون ارسال میشه. با آرزوی موفقیت 🌟 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥52🥰2👌1💯1😍1

Signed 호세인

5 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📝آغاز سلسله جلسات کتاب خوانی دانشکده روانشناسی ✅ 💎 اگر به روانشناسی، رشد فردی و یادگیری عمیق علاقه‌مند هستید، از شما دعوت می‌کنیم در دوره کتاب خوانی و تحلیل کتاب همراه ما باشید. ⭐️ 📖کتاب: سبک‌ها و مهارت‌های ارتباطی ✍️ نویسنده: دکتر نیما قربانی 🔖تحلیل‌گر‌: دکتر غزل لک ( دکترای تخصصی روانشناسی و استاد دانشگاه ) ✅ 🗓 شروع جلسات: جمعه ۲۳ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 🕔 زمان: جمعه‌ها ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ تا ۲۲:۰۰ 💻 محل برگزاری: آنلاین در Google

4❤‍🔥3👍2👌1

Signed 호세인

3 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,610 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌿 دعوت به یک نشست متفاوت و تأمل‌برانگیز 🌿 🧠 گروه روان‌شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج برگزار می‌کند: 🎬نشست آنلاین تحلیل فیلم «طعم گیلاس» اثر ماندگار زنده‌یاد عباس کیارستمی ⬅️تحلیل و بررسی توسط: دکتر مهسا سادات حسینی✅ استاد دانشگاه و روان‌درمانگر✅ 🗓 جمعه ۱۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 🔔 🕗 ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ 💻 به‌صورت آنلاین در Google Meet✅ ✨شرکت در این نشست کاملاً رایگان است.✅ 💫 اگر به روان‌شناسی، سینما و شناخت عمیق‌تر مفاهیم زن

8👌3❤‍🔥2💯1

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC415 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⌛همه ما در مقابل تعریف و تمجیدِ زیاد آسیب پذیریم. ستایش شدن بسی شیرین است، اما دوز بالا و یا نامناسب، آن قند روح و روان شما را بالا می برد و مبتلا به دیابت ذهنی می شوید. مرض قند روانی عوارضی کمتر از مرض قند جسمانی ندارد. ➡️ 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥32

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC378 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌟 هر گاه رفتار نامناسب فریبکار را به رویش بیاوری، به جای پاسخگویی شما را متهم می کند که تو هم بی نقص نیستی. ✅ به جای پذیرش و مسئولیت و دیدن اشتباه خود، در سایه آزار ناشی از سرزنش خود، سریع آن را به فرد مقابل پرتاب می کند تا حس تقصیر را در او به وجود آورد. ✅ 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

👌2❤‍🔥1

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC382 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😘 از دیگر روش های پنهان کردن چاپلوسی، مخالفت ابتدایی فریبکار با شما و سپس موافقت با شماست. این راهبرد باعث می‌شود احساس کنید باهوش و متقاعد کننده اید. تعریف کردن از شما در غیاب شما در مقابل افرادی که می شناسید و انتظار کشیدن اینکه آن ها این تعریف را به شما منتقل کنند،پنهان کاری موثری است. پیش کسی از شما تعریف می کند که می داند به شما منتقل می کند. با استفاده از این روش، چاپلوس از اینکه یک پاچه خوار آشکار به نظر برسد

❤‍🔥3👏1

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅ همان طور که هدف فریبکار می تواند پنهان بماند، چاپلوسی او نیز می تواند پنهان بماند. روش های چاپلوسی می توانند ظریف و زیرکانه باشند. یکی از ظریف ترین شکل های چاپلوسی، مشورت گرفتن از شماست. این درخواست شما را به این گمان می اندازد که فریبکار به نظرات، دانش یا مهارت شما احترام می گذارد و آن ها را تحسین می کند. راه دیگر برای پنهان کردن تملق، سلب مسئولیت از عواقب تحسین است؛ مانند گفتن اینکه نمی خواهم شما را شرمنده کنم ا

❤‍🔥2

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👍 چاپلوسی عبارت است از تعریف و تمجید بیش از حد، بی دلیل و یا نادرست. فریبکار تلاش می کند تا با خودشیرینی نظر شما را در جهت پیشبرد اهداف خود جلب نماید‌. فریبکار از چاپلوسی استفاده می‌کند تا تمایلات خودشیفته فردِ هدف را برانگیزد. 🔗 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥2

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC328 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌻 اغلب آدم ها صاحب دل نیستند، در نتیجه نگاهی جزئی نگر و یک بعدی دارند. این نگاه یک بعدی اغلب روی یک خصیصه ظاهری قفل می‌شود و فرد را عاجز از دیدن تمامیت فرد مقابل و همچنین تمامیت نیازهای خود می کند. 🎁 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥2

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC315 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚫️ پرسش را با پرسش پاسخ دادن، و اتهام را با اتهام جواب دادن، در واقع، نوعی چرخش تمرکز از خود به فرد مقابل است تا آزردگی ای که باید براش پاسخگو باشد، نادیده گرفته شود. 🔄 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥3

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC286 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭐️ فریبکار وانمود می‌کند که در مورد مسائل مهمی که پیش روی او قرار گرفته سردرگم است. او برای نشان دادن اینکه نمی داند طرف مقابل در مورد چه چیزی صحبت می‌کند، گنگ بازی در می آورد. بنابراین شما گیج می شوید و ممکن است در صحت درک خود شک کنید. در این شرایط، گیجی ممکن است مسئولیت را از دوش فریبکار بردارد.‌➡️ 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥2

Signed 호세인

2 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC291 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😗 عقل آدمی به چشم اوست و چشم او اغلب سطحی نگر و جزئی نگر. دامنه توجه ما آدم ها محدود است. هنگامی که در برابر زیبایی، قدرت بدنی، ثروت و امکانات مادی، شهرت، قدرت سیاسی، هوش، دانش و سخنوری قرار می گیرد، مجذوب می شود. 🔤 📕 فریب نهان 👤 نیما قربانی 🟡 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐬⤿ @Ketabi_am 🌱📚

❤‍🔥2

Signed 호세인

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ketabi_am. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,509 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کتاب خوانی دانشکده روانشناسی 📚” (@ketabi_am), 2,797 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketabi_am.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.