Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kespy

@kespyDoc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,763subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206749763
TypeChannel
Username@kespyDoc
DescriptionЯ - Паша (Kespy), а телеграм канал посвещен всему, что связанно со мной Ссылки на все соц. сети - https://taplink.cc/kespy.jpg
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kespyDoc

Growth

6,7636,7706,766.57 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,768 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,763 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,762–6,771 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:116,763-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:576,768-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:306,770no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:246,770first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 6,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held16 (31 December 202522 July 2026)
Views total1,300
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
600
Videos
20
Links
122

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

682 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16824.6%
❤‍🔥9113.3%
🤮7310.7%
🤣6910.1%
🔥598.65%
👍578.36%
🎉304.40%
💔284.11%
👎273.96%
🤯243.52%
👀223.23%
😢172.49%
😁121.76%
🍾20.293%
10.147%
😐10.147%
🙉10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kespyDoc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 01:24 UTC≈1,300 views20 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Упорство! Кучу ребят мне писали сообщения по типу "а вот я превьюшки уже два месяца делаю, что то заказчиков ссовсем нету, вроде и хорошо делаю, подскажи что не так" Последнее время, я стал отвечать на такое сухо "надо делать еще", и чтобы дальше я мог развернуто дать понять человеку, что он не достаточно постарался, я хочу чтобы был этот пост. Я живой пример человека, который совершенно мало, что умеет в этой жиз

15❤‍🔥5

12 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC≈2,180 views25 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Статистика по эмодзи именно 🔡

❤‍🔥19🔥6

7 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC≈2,570 views24 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Решил себе эмодзи сделать, пользуйтесь😎

❤‍🔥10😢95

2 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,970 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, есть новый повод что-то написать... Тут ребята, с которыми я работаю последних пол года, ищут себе в команду нового граф. дизайнера для работы над их комьюнити порталом. Основная задача — создание превью/обложек для публикаций в ленте блога (сайта). Что ждут от тиммейта: - релевантный опыт в создании креативов для игровых/новостных порталов, пабликов в соц. сетях - шарить в теме CS2 (что такое кейсы, скины

👍9🔥64❤‍🔥1

20 May 2026, 23:56 UTC≈3,360 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Меня очень бесит, что есть дни, когда работа прям совсем не получается, как бы я не старался, сколько бы я времени не тратил, ничего не выходит сделать хорошо. При этом, бывают дни, когда я почти не парясь могу выдать одну из лучших работ за все свое время, без какой либо задней мысли.

❤‍🔥4816👍91🤮1😢1

16 May 2026, 12:57 UTC≈3,730 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Раньше было лучше.. Я заметил, что очень много облог, которые повляются сейчас, воспринимаются намного хуже, чем это было раньше С появлением нейросетей, мы стали больше отдавать процессов роботам, из за этого пропали многие душевные вещи в обложках, и глядя на них сейчас, уже не кажется, что они такие крутые, как были раньше.. PS. Пост отложка, писал его еще в конце прошлого года, обидно, что со временем он тольк

💔28

30 Apr 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,310 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Используете нейронки в работах?

  1. Генерю за 1 промт🎉25%
  2. Использую, но в меру😇60%
  3. Только обрабатываю нейронкой🥱20%
  4. Не использую😎15%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Apr 2026, 00:43 UTC≈3,890 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что происходит... Интересно услышать разное мнение, что вы думаете, по поводу подобных нейро облог, я за 10 мин на ютубе нашел 6+ супер на похер сделанных нейро облог.. Как будто по чуть чуть наступает тот момент, когда не только крупные блогеры будут заказывать картинку не ради клик-эффекта, а ради красивой картинки, когда ютуб потеряется в нейро дресиве... Это первый пост, где я буду рад негативным реакциям.. за

🤮72👎157👀2👍2🤯2

3 Apr 2026, 04:45 UTC≈4,290 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ТБанк уже тролит меня 🌅 Скоро.. или не скоро, дропну очень личный пост, который дописываю и переписываю каждый день

🔥25😁125🙉1

1 Apr 2026, 13:14 UTC≈4,190 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ⓘ 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲. 𝗣𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗔𝗫 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿.

🤣69🤯22👎123

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kespyDoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Apr 2026, 09:59 UTCAnonymous Poll440 voters

Используете нейронки в работах?

  1. Генерю за 1 промт🎉25%
  2. Использую, но в меру😇60%
  3. Только обрабатываю нейронкой🥱20%
  4. Не использую😎15%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 811,997 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kespy” (@kespyDoc), 6,763 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kespyDoc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.