Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Курсы шитья Дарьи Кешишевой

@kesewschool

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,599subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397240952
TypeChannel
Username@kesewschool
CreatedBetween 1 May 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kesewschool

Growth

7,5997,6117,6057 August 2026 — 7,611 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,611 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,602 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,599 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,597–7,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:487,599-3
11 Aug 2026, 02:367,602-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:327,611no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:157,611first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 7,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held5 (9 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,022
Reactions total138
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9350.5%
🔥4423.9%
😍2111.4%
💔179.24%
👍73.80%
🥰21.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC542 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Идеальное платье для падела найдено тут 🩷

🔥18😍18

27 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,330 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас основная моя деятельность - это работа над проектом готовых лекал AllSew 🩷 Стараемся выстроить все процессы, делать качественные и стильные лекала, работаем над контентом, мечтаем выйти на международный рынок ❤️‍🔥 ну и просто выгуливаю наши изделия 😍 А завтра будет дроп новинок кстати! Все будет на сайте: all-sew.ru 🔥

27🔥14😍3🥰2

22 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,140 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Разгребаю остатки 🙈 1. Набор лишнеек для припусков 350 руб (в наличии ооооочень много) 2. Лапка для потайной молнии 200 руб 3. Лапка зиг-заг универсальная 500 руб 4. Лапка с ограничителем 500 руб 6. Лапка для пришивания резинки 500 руб 7. Лапка однородковая 500 руб 8. Полная коробка мелков панда 500 руб Заказ отправлю Яндекс доставкой до пункта, она ооочень комфортно стоит (до 100 руб если по Москве) Для заказа пи

4👍3

21 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,010 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В моих снах появилась новая отдельная вселенная - это что я продолжаю работать в школе 🙈 В общем в моих снах школа еще работает 😅

24💔17🔥8

9 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,640 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У нас в проекте выкроек AllSew сегодня дроп новинок ❤️‍🔥 Среди новинок оооочень клевый топ Пальма, он так легко и быстро шьется, а при этом смотрите какой эффектный! Планирую надеть его сегодня вечером на мероприятие, выбираю среди 3х образов, какой лучше? 1 - ❤️ 2 - 🔥 3 - 👍 PS на все новинки действует скидка 30% на сайте: all-sew.ru

38👍4🔥4

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kesewschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,193,881 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Курсы шитья Дарьи Кешишевой” (@kesewschool), 7,599 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kesewschool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.