Channel
@kerstintenn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,177subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001480460695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kerstintenn |
| Description | GM: THE QUANTUM SYNERGY BLUEPRINT® Ich arbeite mit dem, was unter allem liegt. Für Menschen, die weiter gehen. 🎓Lehrraum für altes Wurzelwissen • AAP •EEH• Ahnen & alte Zeichen. ⏳ 36 Jahre Ausbildung & Initiation. 📧 [email protected] |
| Created | 20 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kerstintenn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 17,177 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 17,179 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 17,183 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 17,186 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 17,182 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 17,177 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 17,175 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 17,163 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 17,159 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 17,159 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,120 |
| Reactions total | 1,381 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,837 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,375 | 74.9% | |
| 🙏 | 172 | 9.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 76 | 4.14% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 3.65% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 3.16% | |
| 💯 | 28 | 1.52% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 0.925% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 0.817% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 0.708% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.381% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.218% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.163% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.054% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.054% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,837reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Das Weib war nie nur ein Mensch. Es war das älteste Mysterium der Schöpfung. Aus seinem Leib trat Leben hervor - sichtbar, greifbar und doch unbegreiflich. Noch lange bevor der Mensch die Sprache der Gene verstand, stand er vor einem Rätsel, das sich jeder Erklärung entzog. Der Mann konnte Feuer entfachen, Werkzeuge erschaffen und Berge versetzen. Doch das größte Wunder geschah ohne seine Hand. Im Leib des Weib…
❤61🔥8❤🔥5🙏4
Nichts ist der Wahrheit ferner als die Oberfläche. Wir schmücken, polieren, überdecken. Räume, Körper, Gesichter – manchmal sogar unser eigenes Leben. Und irgendwann halten wir das, was wir nach außen tragen, für das, was wir sind. Doch das Wesentliche war noch nie an der Oberfläche zu finden. Alles Kostbare kommt aus der Tiefe. Selbst das Gold, mit dem wir unsere Oberflächen verzieren, musste zuerst tief in der E…
❤44🙏5👏2🔥1
In den großen Feuern 🔥 In den großen Feuern verbrennen nicht nur Wälder. Es verbrennen Erinnerungen. Lebensräume. Jahrhunderte altes Wissen. Die Heimat unzähliger Wesen. Mit jedem Baum verschwindet eine Geschichte, die lange vor uns begonnen hat. Manchmal wirkt es, als würde nicht nur die Natur brennen, sondern auch unsere Verbindung zu ihr. Asche legt sich über das Land. Und mit ihr die Frage, wie lange wir no…
❤113👍10🙏8💯7🥰1
Lieben guten Morgen 🤎 Siebenmal fallen. Achtmal aufstehen. Nicht das Fallen ist das Scheitern. Sondern das Liegenbleiben. Jeder Sturz zeigt nur, dass du unterwegs warst. Also zerdenke es nicht. Rede es nicht klein. Steh wieder auf. ☀️🌀💪
❤83👍9💯4🙏3👀1
Energie musste nie erschaffen werden. Sie war bereits vorhanden. Die eigentliche Kunst bestand darin, mit ihr in Resonanz zu treten. Alte Bauwerke waren deshalb weit mehr als Stein und Mörtel. Kuppeln, Türme, Metalle, quarzhaltiges Gestein und ihre Proportionen bildeten gemeinsam ein abgestimmtes System. Nicht zufällig errichtet, sondern auf Schwingung ausgerichtet. In Resonanz entsteht kein Kampf. Es entsteht V…
❤108🙏13🔥9👏6🏆3👍2💯1🕊1
Guten Morgen, ihr Lieben. 🤍 Heute Morgen sind diese Worte einfach da. Keine Geschichte. Keine Erklärung. Nur Bilder, die in mir auftauchen. Vielleicht findet ihr euch in dem einen oder anderen wieder. Asche des August Wurzellos Gib dich mir hin Ein Herz, rein gewaschen Ein Schwall Poesie Solange das Tageslicht währt Ich schließe die Augen, um zu träumen Staunendes Beobachten Bäume, die Händchen halten Kurven der E…
❤82🙏8🤩2
Was wäre, wenn die alten Kulturen etwas beobachtet haben, das wir heute erst langsam wieder verstehen? Je tiefer ich mich mit den Runen beschäftige, desto weniger sehe ich sie als Zeichen. Ich sehe sie als Beschreibungen von Bewegungen. Denn eines fällt immer wieder auf: Die Natur arbeitet niemals chaotisch. Sie folgt Mustern. Dieselben Muster finden wir in den Ästen eines Baumes, im Verlauf eines Flusses, in d…
❤102🙏27👍15🔥5💯4❤🔥2
Guten Morgen 🤎☀️ Ich muss dir etwas gestehen … Ich liebe Rosen. 🌹 Nicht nur, weil sie wunderschön aussehen oder herrlich duften. Sondern weil sie für mich den Sommer einfangen wie kaum etwas anderes. Jedes Jahr landen ihre Blütenblätter öfter in meiner Küche. Im Tee, in selbstgemachtem Rosenzucker, in Sirup, über einem Kuchen oder sogar in herzhaften Gerichten. Ihr Geschmack ist fein, blumig und überrascht jedes…
❤73🥰13🙏6❤🔥3🏆1
Du glaubst zu wissen, wie die Welt funktioniert? Glaubst du wirklich, dass das Sichtbare alles ist, was existiert? Was ist Realität? Und wo enden die Grenzen deiner Wahrnehmung? Zwischen Essenz und Materie liegt eine Welt, die sich dem Verstand allein nicht erschließt. Vielleicht ist dieses Universum nur eines von unzähligen. Manche Welten nähren das Leben. Andere verschlingen es. Kräfte, älter als unsere Vor…
❤74🔥25🙏16❤🔥10
Lieben guten Morgen 🤎 Ich wünsche euch von Herzen ein wunderschönes Wochenende – mit Momenten der Ruhe, der Klarheit und Zeit für euch selbst. Denkt heute vielleicht einmal an diesen Satz: „Der Wolf ist nicht gefährlich. Zu vergessen, dass er zu dir gehört, ist es.“ 🐺 Passt gut auf euch auf. 🤗☀️
❤80❤🔥7🙏5👏1🤩1
Channel photo updated
Und so komme ich immer wieder an einen Punkt, der über das hinausgeht, was „moderne wissenschaftliche Forschung“ und materielle Beobachtung nicht allein erfassen können. Je tiefer ich gehe, desto schwieriger wird es, überhaupt noch Worte dafür zu finden. Sprache kann beschreiben. Sie kann ordnen. Aber irgendwann reicht sie nicht mehr aus für die Größe dessen, was sich dahinter zeigt. Je weiter man dieser fraktalen…
❤94❤🔥18🙏9🕊5🐳1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kerstintenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 123,921 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“K. Wilhelmina Tenn ᚺ ᛃ ᛁ🌀” (@kerstintenn), 17,177 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kerstintenn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.