Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы керса

Channel

Отзывы керса

@kers16

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004297060327
TypeChannel
Username@kers16
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 17 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kers16

Growth

35411 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5 subscribers11 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 00:155+1
17 Aug 2026, 21:044+1
13 Aug 2026, 17:313no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:173first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5973.8%
👍810.0%
🥰78.75%
👏33.75%
🔥33.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 23:01 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купил акк в бс 50к кубков за копейки у @Angels_RZN

👍31

18 Jun 2026, 23:00 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Продал аккаунт в оксайде @Angels_RZN не наебал

4

18 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

@Angels_RZN купил акк в блек раше с имущ 90кк не наебал спс огромное

3🥰1

18 Jun 2026, 22:44 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

@Angels_RZN продал акк в пабге не наебал честно думал наебет но не наебал +уважуха

🔥31

17 Jun 2026, 20:25 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купил акк y @Angels_RZNв тг рф за копейки не наебал (минус что там спам блок)

🥰31

17 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

@Angels_RZN купила акк в пабге 71 уровень колекции не наебал +реп

2👍2

17 Jun 2026, 20:08 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

@Angels_RZN продал акк в в стендоффе не наебал я давольна работе

👍31

17 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купил аккаунт в оксайд багги коптпр турки карик , перевел первый ему бабло . Сделал все качественно респект @Angels_RZN

4

17 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC30 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купил акк в пабге всю быстро и качественно не скам @Angels_RZN

4

17 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купила акк в стенде пошли 50на50 не наебал @Angels_RZN

4

17 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

не наебал, красавчик, купил у него монеты и ЖИИИИРНЫЙ АККАУНТ @Angels_RZN - легенда

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kers16. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы керса” (@kers16), 5 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kers16.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.