Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Керчь и Крым — Новости

Channel

Керчь и Крым — Новости

@kerchlive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,711subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385670395
TypeChannel
Username@kerchlive
Created6 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kerchlive

Growth

7,6807,7217,700.56 August 2026 — 7,682 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,686 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,708 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,713 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,721 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,715 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,711 subscribers7,7116 August 202625 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,674–7,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 15:357,711-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:157,715-6
19 Aug 2026, 16:527,721+8
16 Aug 2026, 08:247,713+5
13 Aug 2026, 02:287,708+22
10 Aug 2026, 05:117,686+6
7 Aug 2026, 08:457,680-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,682no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:017,682first reading

Engagement

175 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.76%
avg views ÷ 7,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
598
175 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.701%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
175
of 175 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 175 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held175 (5 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total104,674
Reactions total606
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 28s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

606 reactions across 132 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏27244.9%
13922.9%
👍6410.6%
😁365.94%
😱355.78%
🔥233.80%
👎162.64%
👏91.49%
🤨60.99%
🤷50.825%
🤷‍♀10.165%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 606reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 175 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kerchlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 175 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.14%
2 of 175 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
468
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
582
over 173 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGQ9RRb122 August 202622 August 2026
2W5zFGp8zt917 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC248 viewsread 25 August 2026

❗️2 человека погибли и 2 пострадали при атаке украинских БПЛА на Краснодарский край, сообщил губернатор. В результате падения обломков произошло возгорание на нефтеперерабатывающем предприятии, повреждены 10 домов. 📲 Больше новостей о Керчи и Крыме: MAX | Telegram | VK |

24 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC503 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

⚡️ Беспилотная опасность объявлена в Республике Крым 📲 Больше новостей о Керчи и Крыме: MAX | Telegram | VK |

🙏2

24 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC600 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна просьба жителей выполнена. На тротуарах в районе домов №17, 19, 21, 23 по ул. Войкова установлены четыре полусферы. Глава администрации Керчи Иван Кошель лично занимался данным вопросом, благодаря чему оперативно удалось их приобрести, и по его поручению сотрудники Службы городского хозяйства уже выполнили монтаж. Эта мера призвана предотвратить несанкционированный заезд и парковку транспорта на пешеходных

👍31

24 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC479 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

⚡️ Беспилотная опасность объявлена в Республике Крым ☝️Сохраняйте спокойствие. Доверяйте официальным источникам информации! ГУ МЧС России по Крыму 📲 Больше новостей о Керчи и Крыме: MAX | Telegram | VK |

1

24 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC514 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

В Ялте задержан пособник аферистов, обманувших пенсионерку на 11 млн рублей Жертва лишилась накоплений (1,4 млн) и квартиры (продала за 9,6 млн) — всё под давлением лже-сотрудника Росфинмониторинга. Деньги передавала «инкассаторам». Задержан 19-летний парень из Ставрополья. Он забрал часть суммы, себе оставил 20 тыс. руб., остальное спрятал или передал дальше. Утверждает, что его сами запугали связями с террористам

😱2

24 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC515 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

❗️Адвокат пыталась обмануть севастопольцев на 600 тысяч рублей и попала под статью К ней обратилась супружеская пара за юридической помощью. Адвокат палаты Красноярского края сказала клиентам, что для вынесения незаконного решения нужно передать деньги. В офисе она получила от них 600 тысяч рублей, но распорядиться ими не успела — её задержали сотрудники УФСБ России по Крыму и Севастополю. Адвокат признала свою ви

3

24 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC497 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

В очереди перед Крымским мостом со стороны Керчи стоят 100 автомобилей При этом в Краснодарском крае ситуация иная. Со стороны Тамани скоплений транспорта в настоящее время нет. 📲 Больше новостей о Керчи и Крыме: MAX | Telegram | VK |

👍2

24 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC561 views6 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

❗️ Крымчанина подозревают в госизмене - СБУ предложила ему убить военного Черноморского флота. 23-летний житель Евпатории сам вышел на сотрудника украинских спецслужб и собирал адреса военных и информацию об объектах Минобороны в республике, сообщает УФСБ по Крыму и Севастополю. Также завербованному поручили ликвидировать военнослужащего ЧФ, подорвав автомобиль. Возбуждено уголовное дело по статье о госизмене. Пар

😱42

24 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC582 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

❗️ Правительство РФ окажет помощь предпринимателям, пострадавшим от атак на склады Wildberries, а также самой компании, сообщает Минфин. Главное: 🟥Бизнес получит отсрочку на 12 месяцев по ряду налогов, включая НДС и налог на прибыль, а также страховым взносам. 🟥Поддержка распространяется на юрлица и индивидуальных предпринимателей, чей ущерб превысил 5% годового дохода. 🟥Аналогичные налоговые послабления вводятся

🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @kerchlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Радар Крым
@bad_news_crimea · 51,038
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Керчь и Крым — Новости” (@kerchlive), 7,711 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kerchlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.