Channel
@kep587
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214475443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kep587 |
| Description | 真實反饋，可在綫選擇 北中南看妹資訊： @w5321 深夜小火車： @w231w 安全旅館推薦： @lvguan22 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kep587 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 165 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 165 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 164 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
#雙北 #北部 #客評 來自我哥超詳細的約妹排行榜~ 約了那麽多位正妹 昨天月兒直接衝到排行榜第一名是什麼概念~！ 老司機認證 這些妹妹絶對都很優！😍 不管是約哪一位都不會踩雷~非常推薦‼️ ❇️官方賬號Gleezy搜：kk3664❇️ ❇️約會諮詢點擊👉 私訊涵涵 ❇️ 防走丟官網 ❤️ 一鍵訂閲 優質好妹客評 ❤️ kk3664 安全旅館推薦 ❤️ @tf685 匿名喝茶直接點 ⭐️ ID：kk3664
#雙北 #龜山林口 #本人照 高挑的美腿辣妹！！ 大大看到妹子 直接拿下四節😍 太優質了~約過的客人幾乎都想回約❤️
#雙北 #客評 #本人照僅供宣傳用 骨感嫩妹 一線鮑 漂亮 服務也很好~ 還可以一起泡澡 穴穴超緊實！ 這位我可以給到夯~🥰 ❇️官方賬號Gleezy搜：kk3664❇️ ❇️約會諮詢點擊👉 私訊涵涵 ❇️ 防走丟官網 ❤️ 一鍵訂閲 優質好妹客評 ❤️ kk3664 安全旅館推薦 ❤️ @tf685 匿名喝茶直接點 ⭐️ ID：kk3664
嬌小大奶還不肉的妹妹不好找~ 來找涵涵 涵涵給你安排的明明白白的 不僅身材夠ok 臉蛋也不錯喔~😍
#雙北 #隱藏款 #游泳教練 心動不如行動~我哥被榨乾啦XD 身材很讚 還有白嫩大肉包 女上很會搖 而且上位搖也很會夾 聽說口技也是一絶！嘻嘻😍
方方面面都安排到啦~！ 人美 身材棒 服務又很好 而且很有女友fu喲~讚讚😍 ❇️官方賬號Gleezy搜：kk3664❇️ ❇️約會諮詢點擊👉 私訊涵涵 ❇️ 防走丟官網 ❤️ 一鍵訂閲 優質好妹客評 ❤️ kk3664 安全旅館推薦 ❤️ @tf685 匿名喝茶直接點 ⭐️ ID：kk3664
謝謝寶貝哥哥今天的捧場~ 願意採取涵涵給的意見 老點不在 先約新的妹妹🥰 ❇️官方賬號Gleezy搜：kk3664❇️ ❇️約會諮詢點擊👉 私訊涵涵 ❇️ 防走丟官網 ❤️ 一鍵訂閲 優質好妹客評 ❤️ kk3664 安全旅館推薦 ❤️ @tf685 匿名喝茶直接點 ⭐️ ID：kk3664
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @kep587. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 79,815 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“優質好妹客評” (@kep587), 165 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kep587.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.