Posted without readable text
❤2

Channel
@kenan_7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
674subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001617441286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kenan_7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kenan_7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 674 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 680 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 689 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 690 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,247 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
49 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 26 | 53.1% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 16.3% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2
- احرقت ماضي ذكرياتـك وقفـيت وقطعت حبل الوصل بيـني وبيـنك ㅤ واعلنت حرب الهجر ضدك وصديت وجهزت حربٍ ضد لهـــفت حنيـنك ㅤ شبيت نار الحب باخر اعواد كبريت وكريتها لين احرقت ماضي سنينك ㅤ يـالي على قلبـي لعــبت وتماديـت ضيـعت واحد عـز راسك وصانــك ㅤ بعتك بأرخص سعر يومك تماديت واليوم دورك تشرب المر بيدينك .
💔3
الخيانة،التخلي، الغدر،الرحيل،التجاهل .. أشياء تمزّق القلب وتصيب كينونة الروح، كأنها سكاكين لا تُرى، تُغمد في أعماقك دون أن يلمحها أحد، فتبتسم للناس، بينما داخلك ساحة حربٍ لا تهدأ. ㅤ هي ليست مجرد كلمات… بل زلازل خفيّة، تضرب في أكثر الأماكن أمانًا، كأن قلبك بيتٌ قديم، كان عامرًا بالضحكات، ثم داهمته الريح في ليلةٍ عاصفة، فأطفأت مصابيحه، وأسقطت جدرانه، وتركتك واقفًا بين الأنقاض… لا تعرف من أين تبدأ الحكاية من جديد. …
💔2
أنا شخص مستحيل تفهمني ولو بيننا أيام وشهور وسنوات مارح تفهم تقلبات مزاجي ، والكلمات المحذوفة بالمحادثة مارح تفهم عمق شعوري ، ولا رح تفهم صمتي ولـو بتختار الفراق بتلقاني ساكت ولا أعاتب ولو تضايقني بأسلوبك لا تتوقع أني أجيك اعاتبك ولو تسوء الفهم فيني مستـحيل أبرر لك " إستحالة تفهمني"
❤1💯1
رحلت عن دارك وانا خاطري فيك ㅤ رحيل حاكم دولته مستحلة ㅤ حاولت أكابر وأنسى ماضي لياليك ㅤجتني طيوفك زادت الطين بله ㅤ سالت دموعي فوق خدي تناديك ㅤ عقبك ترا دنياي صارت ممله ㅤ ㅤاببـتعد عنك وأنـا خاطري فيك ㅤوبسوق رجلي واتوكل على الله
💔2
- ولكنك كُنتَ تأتي بعد أن تنتهي لهفتي، بعدما أكون قد خضت ألف حوار مع قلقي .
💔1
- من أقسى أنواع الاستنزاف أن يختزلوك الآخرون في دور المسعف النفسي؛ فلا يتذكرونك إلا حين تثقلهم همـومهـم، أو تضيق بهم الحياة، فيـفرغون فيك أوجاعهـم وطاقتـهم السلبية. أما حين تبتسم لهم الدنيا، وتمتلئ أيامهم بالفرح والاحتفال، فتصبح بالنسبة إليهم شخـصًا عابـرًا، لا مكـان لك في لحظاتهم السعيدة، وكأن وجودك خُلق فقط لتحـمل عنـهم ما يعجزون عن حمله.
😢2
أنا اليوم أكمل حياتي دون أشخاص لم أكن أقدر يوماً على تخيل حياتي من دونهم .. أنا اليوم أثق باحساسي و استمع اليه ولا آبه ان شكك احدهم بتصديقي إياه .. أنا اليوم لا أتوقع ، ولا اصدم بأي شيء و بأي شخص .. أنا اليوم توقفت عن تصديق 90% مما يقال لي ، اضحك بهستيريا حين اسمع وعداً بالبقاء .. أنا اليوم على قناعة تامة بأن المجاملات مجدية لكنني لا أطبقها .. أنا اليوم اقدر نفسي و أثق بأن راحتها أغلى بكثير من راحتهم ، أحترم عقلي و أ…
❤3
لَقَد خُسرت الكثير بسَبب عزة نفسي وَمازلت عَلَى استعداد لخسَارَة المزيد منْ أجلهَا . ..
- وإخوان إتخذتهم دروعاً فكانوها ولكن للأعادي وخلتهم سهاماً صائبات فكانوها ولكن في فؤادي
قد يبدو أنني أُغلق عيني وأمضي كما لو أني أجهل ما يجري حولي، لكن الحقيقة أبعد من ذلك. أنا لا أعيش في ظلال الأكاذيب، ولا أُخدع بلمعان الوعود الزائفة. أنا أدرك جيدًا ما يدور خلف ظهري، وأعلم ما يُقال لي بنعومة الكلمات، وما يُخفى خلفها من صدى الرياء. ㅤ لكني لا أتكلم، ليس لأنني غافل، بل لأنني أراقب، أختار لحظتي بعناية. صمتي ليس ضعفًا، بل مساحة أتركها للكذب كي يتشابك بخيوطه، حتى يظهر جليًا كالشمس في كبد السماء. ㅤ تصرفاتي …
- لقـد فَقدت القُـدرة على العِـتاب ، شتَاتَ الطُـرق المجهولة المُناقشات الطويلة، لا أملك طاقـة كَافيـة لِبدأ اي علاقـة جديدة لا أستَطيع التشَبُث بأي شخص أو حتى التَعبير عن مشَاعري له فقدت الشَغف تجاه الكثير من الأشياء التي قد أنتَظرتها طويلاً، وأصبحت أميل أكثر للصَمت، يقَولون بَعد مرور العاصفة تُصبح شخص آخر لا يَنتظر ما يَتـمناه ، لا يُفـكر إلا في مـرور أيامـة في صمَت وهدوء تام.
💔3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kenan_7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 476,659 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هلوسات مفارق ٰـ₎❥┊⁽😴✍.” (@kenan_7), 674 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kenan_7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.