Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КЕЛАЖАК МЕНЕЖЕРЛАРИ

Channel

КЕЛАЖАК МЕНЕЖЕРЛАРИ

@kelajakmenejeri

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,213subscribers

+257 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003249824116
TypeChannel
Username@kelajakmenejeri
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kelajakmenejeri

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

3,520 average views per post against 3,213 subscribers — an engagement rate of 109.5%. Across the 87,901 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers — the middle half sit between 5.67% and 23.5%, with a median of 12.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 July 2026 20 August 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (2 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled66,829
Mature posts only120.1% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers3,213 measured 17 August 2026
Cohortb3162 · 87,901 channels · p10 2.37% · p25 5.67% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.5% · p90 40.0%
Position in cohort99.165th percentile · 9.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.092% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

2,9563,2133,084.56 August 2026 — 2,956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,967 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,048 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,125 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,213 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +257. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,917–3,252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:583,213+88
13 Aug 2026, 10:153,125+77
10 Aug 2026, 07:473,048+81
7 Aug 2026, 01:372,967+11
6 Aug 2026, 15:222,956first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.5%
avg views ÷ 3,213 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,520
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (19 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total66,829
Reactions total93
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4544.1%
🔥3130.4%
👍2221.6%
👏43.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC594 viewsread 8 August 2026

Obunachilarmiz orasida DMTT rahbari va xodimlari bo‘lsa, aynan siz uchun ajoyib imkoniyat @KelajakMenejerlariBot da menejerlik modullari asosida tuzilgan testlarimizni taklif etamiz. https://t.me/kelajakmenejeri

6 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈3,580 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Менежерлик модуллари 3-модул асосида тузилган тест. 👨‍💻Компютерда ишланади. 📶 интернетсиз шароитда ишланадиган тестдан намуна. https://t.me/kelajakmenejeri

1

4 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC≈1,390 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @liderlar1

#кун_ҳикмати Ҳеч нарсани кейинга сурма! Кейинроқ қаҳва совийди. Кейинроқ қизиқиш сўнади. Кейинроқ кун тунга айланади. Кейинроқ умр ўтиб кетади. Кейин эса, имконинг бор пайтда қилмаган ишинг учун қаттиқ афсусланасан.

👍13🔥51

2 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,650 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪙MENEJERLIKKA TAYYORGARLIKNI BUGUNDAN BOSHLANG! 🪙 🚀 @KelajakMenejerlariBot- direktorlar va direktorlikka nomzodlar uchun barcha modullar mavzulari asosida tayyorlangan mukammal testlar jamlanmasi. ✔️Bilimingizni mustahkamlang ✔️Bo‘shliqlaringizni aniqlang ✔️Xatolaringiz ustida ishlang ✔️Imtihonga tizimli tayyorlaning ⏰ Bot orqali 1 oy davomida istalgan vaqtda test ishlash imkoniyatiga ega bo‘lasiz. 📩 Ulani

1

2 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈2,940 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

8-модул асосида тузилган тест. 👨‍💻Компютерда ишланади. 📶 интернетсиз шароитда ишланадиган тестдан намуна. https://t.me/kelajakmenejeri

🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,160 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📣 ДИҚҚАТ, ЭЪЛОН!!! 🗣 МАКТАБГАЧА ТАЪЛИМ ТАШКИЛОТЛАРИ ДИРЕКТОР ВА ЎРИНБОСАРЛАРИ УЧУН 🎓 “КЕЛАЖАК МЕНЕЖЕРЛАРИ” ТАЙЁРЛОВ ГУРУҲИГА ЯНГИ ҚАБУЛ БОШЛАНДИ! Мактабгача таълим ташкилотлари раҳбарлари ҳамда менежерлик сертификатини қўлга киритишни мақсад қилган директорликка номзодларни махсус тайёрлов гуруҳимизга таклиф қиламиз! Тайёрлов жараёнида: ✅ модул мавзулари тизимли ўрганилади; ✅ мураккаб тестлар таҳлил қилинади; ✅

👍32🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,650 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бамбук ўстириш ёки сабр дарси Хитойликларнинг бамбук ўстириш услуби бундай: олдин уруғ экилади, сув қуйилади, ўғитланади. Биринчи йили уруғда ҳеч қандай ўзгариш кўринмайди. Уруғ янгитдан суғорилиб, ўғит солинади. Иккинчи йили ҳам шу ҳол такрорланади. Учинчи ва тўртинчи йиллари ҳам шундай қилинади, бироқ қайсар уруғ шунда ҳам униб чиқмайди. Хитойликлар катта сабр билан бешинчи йили ҳам уруққа сув ва ўғит беришда даво

9🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,970 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

10-модул инфографикалари. https://t.me/kelajakmenejeri

29 Jul 2026, 03:31 UTC≈2,840 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ассалому алайкум туғма Лидерлар ва бўлажак Менежерлар. Агар бугун Сиз тест синови топширишга кирар экансиз, унутманг бу даражагача Сиз анча йўлни босиб ўтдингиз, тайёргарлик кўрдингиз. Мақсадингиз ва миссиянгиз аниқ бўлди. Аждодлар мероси, устозлар ўгити ва Авлонийдаги проффессорларнинг сермазмун сабоқлари бугун ўз сўзини айтиши керак. Сизлар бугун юқори баллга ва менежерлик сертификатига лойиқ бўлган инсонларсиз.

11🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC≈4,940 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

4-модул асосида тузилган тест. 👨‍💻Компютерда ишланади. 📶 интернетсиз шароитда ишланадиган тестдан намуна. https://t.me/kelajakmenejeri

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kelajakmenejeri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 03:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz430 voters

🛜 TO'G'RI JAVOB VARIANTINI TOPING!

  1. A45%
  2. B30%
  3. C16%
  4. D10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 03:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz347 voters

✍️ TO'G'RI JAVOB VARIANTINI TOPING!

  1. A14%
  2. B12%
  3. C55%
  4. D19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 02:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz321 voters

✅ TO'G'RI JAVOB VARIANTINI TOPING!

  1. A8%
  2. B75%
  3. C7%
  4. D9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 02:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz309 voters

TO'G'RI JAVOB VARIANTININ TOPING!

  1. A73%
  2. B12%
  3. C7%
  4. D7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 759,987 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КЕЛАЖАК МЕНЕЖЕРЛАРИ” (@kelajakmenejeri), 3,213 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kelajakmenejeri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.