Channel
@keffsik
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
1,461subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003291012859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keffsik |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keffsik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,461 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,463 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 1,458 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,459 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,459 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (15 May 2026 โ 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,845 |
| Reactions total | 1,214 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
4,893 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customย 6089065634795099782 | 1,915 | 39.1% | |
| customย 6088983532200270220 | 1,480 | 30.2% | |
| customย 5994708312858303721 | 845 | 17.3% | |
| ๐ | 211 | 4.31% | |
| ๐ | 211 | 4.31% | |
| ๐ | 133 | 2.72% | |
| ๐ | 98 | 2.00% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 4,893reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ณ๐ฅชะะพะฒะตะปะธัะตะปั ะบะฐะฟะบััะฐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
customย 608898353220027022068customย 599470831285830372144customย 608906563479509978232๐8๐1๐1
Posted without readable text
customย 608898353220027022090customย 608906563479509978278customย 599470831285830372145๐14๐4๐3๐1
Posted without readable text
customย 6089065634795099782169customย 6088983532200270220141customย 5994708312858303721103๐22๐8๐7๐4
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ะ ะตะบะฒะตัั ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
customย 6089065634795099782168customย 6088983532200270220123customย 599470831285830372167๐7๐4๐2
๐๐แ แ แ แ แ ๐๐แ แ ๐ฉท๐ฉท๐ฉท ๐๐แ แ แ แ แ ๐๐ ๐ฉท๐ฉท ะขัะตะนะดะธะบ ั ัะพะฑะฐัะบะพะน ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ง๐๐๐๐
customย 6089065634795099782145customย 6088983532200270220115customย 599470831285830372173๐17๐9๐4๐3
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ป๐ป ะณะธััะธะบ ๐ฅบ ๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
customย 6089065634795099782152customย 6088983532200270220109customย 599470831285830372171๐15๐10๐3๐2
โฉโฉ๏ธโฉ๏ธโฉ๏ธโฉ๏ธโฉ๏ธะะฟ๐ฅข๐ฅข โฉ๏ธโฉ๏ธ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
customย 6088983532200270220186customย 6089065634795099782125customย 599470831285830372186๐27๐4๐4๐4
โ๏ธโ๏ธ๐ฅบโ๏ธโ๏ธ๐โ๏ธโ๏ธ ๐ โ๏ธโ๏ธ
customย 6088983532200270220169customย 6089065634795099782120๐84customย 599470831285830372144๐7๐6๐2
๐๐๐๐๐๐ผ๐๐โ๏ธ๐คฉ ๐คฉะขัะตะนะด ั ฯ(โงฯโฆ*)๐ธ ๐๐ชฒ๐๐๐๐ค๐๐๐๐
customย 6089065634795099782218customย 6088983532200270220141customย 599470831285830372186๐29๐5๐5๐4
๐๐ ><!โญ๏ธ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ ๐๐ ัะธะฑะธ ััะตะนะด ั U^ใง^U๐
customย 6089065634795099782203customย 6088983532200270220168๐80customย 599470831285830372133๐7๐2๐1
๐ฆข๐ฆข๐ป๐ป๐ป๐๐ป๐ป๐ป ๐ชทะก ะดะฝะตะผ ัะพะถะดะตะฝะธั @hornystrangebun๐ ๐ป๐ป๐ป๐ป ๐ป๐ป๐ป๐ป ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ
customย 6089065634795099782180customย 6088983532200270220118customย 599470831285830372162๐13๐5๐4
๐๐๐คฉ๐คฉ๐๐๐คฉ๐คฉ๐๐
customย 6089065634795099782153๐89customย 599470831285830372170customย 608898353220027022021๐4๐3๐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @keffsik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 170,991 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@keffsik named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ฅฏโ (@keffsik), 1,461 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keffsik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.