Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📞電話特派專員

@keepcontacthk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,509subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001292156761
TypeChannel
Username@keepcontacthk
Created17 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/keepcontacthk

Growth

1,5091,5121,510.56 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,509 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,509–1,512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:121,509-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:161,511-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:331,512first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.01%
avg views ÷ 1,509 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 June 20254 August 2026)
Views total136
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC327 viewsread 7 August 2026

每年到咗呢個時候都會出嚟鼓勵吓大家。 嗰張紙 過咗10年20年之後就未必會再有用 真正重要嘅係你往後嘅人生選擇點樣行 唔好俾一張紙同埋幾個數字框架咗自己 用自己最合適嘅方法,活出自己最精彩嘅人生。 共勉之。

10 May 2026, 10:48 UTC604 viewsread 7 August 2026

請樓面pt、咖啡師pt/ft 銅鑼灣港式餐廳+cafe 簡單樓面工作,唔會好chur,醒目肯做聽講;做咖啡就自己搞晒,好忙會有人幫手 唔好遲到射波 時薪$70-80 有意pm @hksarqueenxx

15 Feb 2026, 15:53 UTC825 viewsread 7 August 2026

2位強制寄宿生 啱啱上個月畢咗業 需要幫手搵工 其中1位係女同學,幼教背景,知道做唔返相關行業 如果有僱主有興趣嘅,請聯絡我 @hksarqueenxx

14 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTC792 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

突發有一張飛可以放出嚟有冇人想要? $300 @hksarqueenxx

1 Feb 2026, 15:30 UTC976 viewsread 7 August 2026

2026年第一個月過左去了 距離當年嘅夢越走越遠 我哋未必可以期盼到夢變真 但係希望大家一切安好。 攬下自己,你好叻架啦🥹

25 Dec 2025, 17:40 UTC848 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚠️⚠️⚠️ 急請法國餐中工炒聖誕新年檔期⚠️⚠️⚠️ 銅鑼灣 近地鐵 要有西法餐經驗 @hksarqueenxx

27 Nov 2025, 06:46 UTC958 viewsread 7 August 2026

1432 #更新 #大埔 #大埔物資救援組 ❌❌❌❌❌停收物資❌❌❌❌❌ 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 請勿再湧入,免成混亂,阻礙救援 有需要幫手會再公布 多謝大家有心 熱心人士可以養精蓄銳 稍後部份義工需要替更 到時候會再搵人幫手 感謝各位 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 🔈重要消息🔈 ❌❌❌❌❌停收物資❌❌❌❌❌ 02. 風火堂 ❌停收物資 04. 東昌街體育館 ❌停收物資 06. 大埔社區中心 政府已接手 ❌停收義工及物資 10. 大埔文娛中心 ❌停收所有物資 16. 樂善邨 ❌停收物資 18. 馮梁結紀念中學 政府已接手 ❌停收義工及物資 19. 元洲仔 ❌停收物資 22. 富善邨社區會堂 ❌停收物資 23. 廣福球場中石化油站 ❌停物資 24. 策城軒 ❌暫時停收日用物資 25. 藝術中心 ❌停收物資 ❌❌❌❌❌停收物資❌❌❌❌❌ 🟫物資🟫 04. 東昌街體育館 - ❌停收物資 - 只收枕頭 - *(飯

27 Nov 2025, 04:18 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026

今日唔講政治 睇到香港人仲係好齊心 悲劇已經發生咗 希望大埔嘅大家安好 亦為離去嘅消防員同居民嘅親友致最深切慰問🫂 天佑香港🇭🇰

28 Oct 2025, 04:03 UTC770 viewsread 7 August 2026

求教 請問有冇紮鐵嘅師傅 識睇鐵圖嘅師傅 @hksarqueenxx

31 Aug 2025, 08:45 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

執CV同面試培訓班

  1. 有興趣78%
  2. 暫時冇需要22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @keepcontacthk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2025, 08:45 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

執CV同面試培訓班

  1. 有興趣78%
  2. 暫時冇需要22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2025, 09:59 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

問多句,如果今年我哋再同餅房合作出返月餅,大家有冇興趣?

  1. 32%
  2. 睇口味29%
  3. 睇價錢18%
  4. 不了21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 132,525 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📞電話特派專員” (@keepcontacthk), 1,509 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keepcontacthk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.