Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кинопус

Channel

Кинопус

@keenopus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,592subscribers

+195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740613149
TypeChannel
Username@keenopus
Created18 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/keenopus

Growth

21,39721,59221,494.56 August 2026 — 21,397 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,397 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,406 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,408 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,404 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,403 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,404 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,409 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,486 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,560 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,573 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,592 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 17 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,368–21,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 12:4721,592+19
21 Aug 2026, 19:5821,573+13
20 Aug 2026, 14:4821,560+21
19 Aug 2026, 13:3521,539+53
18 Aug 2026, 15:1321,486+77
17 Aug 2026, 16:3621,409+5
16 Aug 2026, 08:4721,404+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:4721,403-1
12 Aug 2026, 11:4421,404-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:3221,408+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:5321,406+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:1221,401-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:0321,403+3
8 Aug 2026, 00:2221,400+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:5121,397no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:3121,397first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.6%
avg views ÷ 21,592 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 December 202518 August 2026)
Views total32,760
Reactions total2,261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9,770 reactions across 21 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,34634.2%
🤣1,76318.0%
🔥1,73317.7%
1,33113.6%
👍9569.79%
👏2182.23%
🙈1101.13%
🤯540.553%
❤‍🔥380.389%
310.317%
👎220.225%
🙉180.184%
🙏180.184%
🤩160.164%
🫡160.164%
😱150.154%
🤔130.133%
😢100.102%
👀80.082%
👌60.061%
16 further kinds480.491%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,770reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 21 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @keenopus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 December 2025 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC≈7,260 views919 reactions4 Starsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

382🔥275👏91🤣67😁59👍20❤‍🔥10🗿6

3 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈10,800 views585 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁302🔥10781🤣41👍23👏15🤯13👌2

28 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC≈14,700 views757 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁317🤣181🔥12360🙈42👍20👏4🍾3

24 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈17,600 views217 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Наш формат «Пересказ за три минуты» стал популярным, но Ютуб популярным быть перестал. Зато стал сложным. Популярный формат в сложном Ютубе размещать трудно, поэтому мы вынесли «Пересказ за три минуты» в Инстаграм. Та-дааа! Подписывайтесь, лайкайте, хулиганьте там по-всякому. Ну, что мы вам рассказываем – и так всё знаете 🙂 https://www.instagram.com/kinopus.official?igsh=MXR6NXJlZmc3NzB4bA%3D%3D&utm_source=qr

131🔥33👎18👍16😢10🤔4🤪3🤡2

14 Jul 2026, 21:29 UTC≈21,300 views150 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Упаковали «Военную машину» в три минуты для тех, кому лень читать. #кинопусэкспресс https://youtu.be/zouKx5gCTlc?si=qV0OKRJXD3dfU54l

🔥90😁41👍109

13 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈19,500 views280 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026
Photo

«Закулисье реальности»: лиминальщина Поддержать Кинопус: Сбер или Тбанк

👍143😁75🔥3022👏6🤯4

13 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈17,700 views477 reactionsread 23 August 2026

«Закулисье реальности»: лиминальщина (3/3) Мэри, верная пациенту и долгу психолога, отправляется вслед за мухой в желтые коридоры. Довольно быстро она находит Кларка — он ведет себя вполне мирно, но потом вдруг хватает Мэри руками за шею и придушивает до потери сознания. Мэри приходит в себя привязанной к стулу в некотором подобии кухни. Перед ней сидит Кларк, такой же неприятно-нервный, как и всегда. Кроме них на

🤣271😁75🔥6625🤯14👍13👏9🤔4

13 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC≈13,700 views342 reactionsread 23 August 2026

«Закулисье реальности»: лиминальщина (2/3) Кларк решает, что нужно провести исследование, поэтому берет двух молодых сотрудников магазина — девушку Кэт и юношу Бобби, и показывает им нарисованный на стене цокольного этажа дверной проем. — Вот, — говорит Кларк, как будто всё вообще нормально, — это дверь и мы идём туда проводить исследование. И уходит сквозь стену, а потом из-за стены начинает нетерпеливо кричать,

😁228🔥7129👏11👍2🤔1

13 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC≈12,800 views411 reactionsread 23 August 2026

«Закулисье реальности»: лиминальщина (1/3) Посмотрели фильм «Закулисье реальности» о том, что не стоит открывать психологу прямо вот все свои цокольные этажи и кладовки. Начинается фильм завлекалочкой, в которой человек с видеокамерой на голове мечется по странным желтым коридорам и кричит. Поскольку коридоры очень напоминают офисные, то кричит он, как мы понимаем, коллегам. «Коллеги! — кричит он. — Коллеги, меня с

😁255🔥6948👍18🤣13👏5🤔3

24 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC≈16,200 views335 reactions3 Starsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Военная машина: команда «Газу!» Поддержать Кинопус: Сбер или Тбанк

🔥247😁45❤‍🔥28👍112🙏2

24 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈15,800 views708 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

Военная машина: команда «Газу!» (6/6) Утюг видит, как над карьером взлетает сигнальная ракета, идёт туда и встает на краю, чтобы как следует всё просканировать. Но Алан заминировал край карьера! Он взрывает заряды, Утюг оскальзывается и падает на дно карьера, как... как утюг, простите ради бога. Пока Утюг поднимается на ноги, мотая плоской башкой, из ангара вырывается Алан на фронтальном погрузчике. Он разгоняется

🤣445🔥159👍53😁2421🙏41👎1

24 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈10,700 views389 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Военная машина: команда «Газу!» (5/6) Посреди разрушенного лагеря кособоко стоит застрявший четырёхколёсный бронетранспортер. Бойцы героически заводят транспортёр, героически ставят его на все колеса и смотрят на компас. В кабине посередине приборной панели установлен огромный компас, он там прямо главный прибор, как будто это корабль вообще, а не автомобиль. Компас бешено вращается, а это значит, надо спешить. Сед

😁218🔥65🤣6023👍18🙏3🤗2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @keenopus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 769,534 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кинопус” (@keenopus), 21,592 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keenopus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.