Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kedavra.art

Channel

Kedavra.art

@kedavra_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

931subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644991492
TypeChannel
Username@kedavra_art
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kedavra_art

Growth

87393190216 September 2026 — 873 subscribers18 September 2026 — 931 subscribers16 September 202618 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 864–940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:00931+58
16 Sept 2026, 15:22873first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 931 subscribers
Avg views / post
466
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held13 (6 September 202616 September 2026)
Views total6,057
Reactions total609
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
1m 56s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

609 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535528111090749390138963.9%
custom 545848528379000435312921.2%
custom 54498165537279980237211.8%
🤔193.12%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 609 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 13 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kedavra_art. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2026 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC231 views50 reactions3 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Снова скетчики конечно

custom 535528111090749390143custom 54498165537279980235custom 54584852837900043532

15 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC396 views31 reactions5 Starsread 16 September 2026

Я на скетчи последнее время подсела, очень нравится Рисую на принтерных листах, если испорчу то не жалко а если хорошо получается то тем более круто! Жалко только что цвет у этой бумаги не приятный Может можете посоветовать какие нибудь скетчбуки с похожей бумагой? Без текстуры и чтобы карандаш также скользил 😭

custom 544981655372799802322custom 54584852837900043539

15 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC403 views70 reactions4 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Вайбик средневековой крестьянки🧺

custom 535528111090749390149custom 545848528379000435312custom 54498165537279980239

14 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC431 views75 reactions2 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Скетчи на ночь😪

custom 545848528379000435351custom 535528111090749390119custom 54498165537279980235

13 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC480 views34 reactions3 Starsread 16 September 2026

Стерла карандаш и обвела цветным чтобы попробовать поработать акварелью 🤔

🤔19custom 535528111090749390115

13 Sept 2026, 11:51 UTC471 views33 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 545848528379000435318custom 535528111090749390115

10 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC547 views37 reactions4 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 535528111090749390127custom 545848528379000435310

10 Sept 2026, 18:26 UTC510 views41 reactions4 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Хорошие референсы рук🙌🏻

custom 535528111090749390141

9 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC537 views49 reactions3 Starsread 16 September 2026

Для моих любимых подписчиков телеграм канала!! показываю вам самым первым

custom 535528111090749390132custom 544981655372799802310custom 54584852837900043537

9 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTC535 views47 reactions2 Starsread 16 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 535528111090749390135custom 54498165537279980237custom 54584852837900043535

8 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC485 views47 reactions3 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Знаете что я заметила? Мне очень нравится скетчить на офисной обычной бумаге для принтера, чем на какой-то крутой бумаге для графики с повышенной плотностью. На тонкой бумаге карандаш по другому себя ведет, он приятно скользит а еще линии получаются тонкими и аккуратными! Какой вам больше нравится из этих двух рисунков? Слева бумага 180г Справа бумага для принтера

custom 535528111090749390140custom 54498165537279980237

7 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC518 views50 reactions2 Starsread 16 September 2026
Video

Решила рассказать про свои не красивые рисунки в скетчбуке, сняла видео в тикток Как вам такая рубрика?

custom 535528111090749390137custom 54584852837900043539custom 54498165537279980234

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kedavra_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kedavra.art” (@kedavra_art), 931 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kedavra_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.