Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Amazon Publishing Services | Booklab PRO⚡️

Channel

Amazon Publishing Services | Booklab PRO⚡️

@kdp_publishing_services

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,271subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002082573959
TypeChannel
Username@kdp_publishing_services
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kdp_publishing_services

Growth

2,2542,2762,2657 August 2026 — 2,254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,254 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,263 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,268 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,276 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers2,2717 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,251–2,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:282,271-5
27 Aug 2026, 05:092,276+5
24 Aug 2026, 04:372,271+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:052,270+2
17 Aug 2026, 09:442,268+5
13 Aug 2026, 14:282,263+5
10 Aug 2026, 22:342,258+4
7 Aug 2026, 17:182,254no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:062,254first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.16%
avg views ÷ 2,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (10 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total325
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3146.3%
🔥2943.3%
👍57.46%
11.49%
🤩11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC193 viewsread 7 August 2026

Полезное для наших новичков-издателей 👇 Антон запустил новую рубрику — разбор ниш на Amazon KDP. В первом выпуске разбирает главную ошибку на старте и объясняет базу👌 Кто в теме недавно — обязательно к просмотру 🎥

7 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC132 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zone_profit_zone

❗️Первый выпуск новой рубрики уже на YouTube! 🎥 Друзья, помните, я звал вас присылать свои ниши на разбор? Заявок прилетело много — спасибо всем! 🙌🏻 И вот, встречайте первую часть 👌 ▶️ СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО Внутри: 👉 главная ошибка новичков, из-за которой анализ ниши теряет смысл; 👉 разбираю реальные заявки подписчиков; 👉 наглядные примеры, после которых многое встанет на свои места. В следующих выпусках пойдём глубже —

🔥51

30 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTCviews —

Amazon Publishing Services | Booklab PRO⚡️ pinned «❗️Друзья, короткое, но важное объявление❗️ У нас временные технические трудности с Telegram-аккаунтом. Если вы не получили от нас ответ — причина только в этом. Никого не бросили, работа с каждым из вас идёт в обычном режиме. Но если вдруг мы вас потеряли…»

30 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC521 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❗️Друзья, короткое, но важное объявление❗️ У нас временные технические трудности с Telegram-аккаунтом. Если вы не получили от нас ответ — причина только в этом. Никого не бросили, работа с каждым из вас идёт в обычном режиме. Но если вдруг мы вас потеряли или вы долго ждёте ответ на почту, хотите с нами связаться — пожалуйста, пишите нам в WhatsApp 💩: +380 (93) 281 36 56

21

30 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC398 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zone_profit_zonePhoto

Привет, друзья!👋🏻 Ну а у меня опять минутка похвастаться✨ Тут прилетел вот такой тёплый отзыв от моей студентки! Марин, спасибо тебе огромное за слова🫶🏻 Прямо огонь, что ты не сидишь на месте, работаешь над каждой книгой и идёшь вперёд. Вот с таким подходом точно всё получится💪 Кстати, о том как докручивать книги) В эту пятницу (завтра!) у нас очередной закрытый разбор книг для студентов🔥 Как раз то самое место,

5👍1🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC490 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья!💛 На связи команда BookLab Pro За последнее время нам прилетело столько тёплых слов, что просто не можем оставить всё это только в личных чатах с менеджерами) 📚 Собрали для вас небольшую подборку отзывов от людей, которые работают с нами🔥 Кто-то заказывал готовые книги и уже стабильно продаёт их на Amazon. Кто-то доверил нам книгу «под ключ» — от идеи до финального PDF. А кто-то забрал промо-ролик и

🔥4

21 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC562 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zone_profit_zonePoll

Какая обложка вам нравится больше всего?

  1. 147%
  2. 214%
  3. 322%
  4. 423%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC523 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zone_profit_zonePhoto

Привет, друзья! Сегодня история, которая меня сильно зацепила. Просто не могу не рассказать 🫶🏻 Пришла ко мне клиентка на «Писатель под ключ» — Марина Бородина. Актриса, сценаристка, телеведущая, мама двоих сыновей. А до этого ещё и каскадёрка в Голливуде — представляете? И автор книги «Против ветра», которую она писала… ГЛАЗАМИ 👀 Да, друзья, всё правильно прочитали. У Марины БАС — тяжёлое заболевание, при котор

3

15 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC822 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💜 Такие сообщения — лучшая оценка нашей работы. Именно ради таких результатов команда BookLab PRO каждый день делает свою работу. Для нас важно не просто выпустить книгу. Важно, чтобы весь путь — от выбора проекта до получения готовой книги — был спокойным, понятным и комфортным. Когда клиент пишет, что: ✅ всё сделали вовремя; ✅ всегда были на связи; ✅ услышали его идеи; ✅ а результат превзошёл ожидания — значит,

9🔥3

25 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC936 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, привет! 💛 Недавно Ольга прислала нам отзыв о промо-видео для своей книги — и нам очень захотелось поделиться им с вами 🤗 Такие слова для нас особенно ценны, потому что за каждым промо-видео всегда стоит совместная работа, поиск лучшего решения и внимание к каждой детали. 🎥 Если вы тоже задумываетесь о промо-видео для своей книги — пишите менеджеру → @publishing_services ⏳ Напоминаем: до конца месяца при п

4🔥3

24 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC706 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На связи команда BookLab Pro 👋🏻 Видели свежий пост Антона про обновление по видео-рекламе на Amazon? 🎥 Напоминаем, у нас как раз в тему действует акция: до конца июня при заказе любой готовой книги из каталога вы получаете проморолик для Amazon рекламы в ПОДАРОК 🎁 Идеально, чтобы зайти в высокий сезон с сильным видео в PPC 🔥 Пишите менеджеру, чтобы забронировать книгу и получить видеоролик как бонус👇 ➡️ @publishi

👍2

24 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC725 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zone_profit_zone

Небольшой апдейт из жизни нашей книжной банды 📚 В прошлую пятницу для студентов программы добавил новый мини-блок по Amazon PPC: 🎬 «Видео-реклама в Amazon PPC для KDP» Сразу 5 новых уроков по инструменту, который многие издатели до сих пор либо недооценивают, либо используют не совсем правильно. И это, кстати, вполне обычное событие в рамках моей системы поддержки студентов. Периодически в программе появляются но

🔥32👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kdp_publishing_services. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Poll346 voters

Какая обложка вам нравится больше всего?

  1. 147%
  2. 214%
  3. 322%
  4. 423%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Amazon Publishing Services | Booklab PRO⚡️” (@kdp_publishing_services), 2,271 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdp_publishing_services.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.