Channel
@kdludit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,990subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002547694867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kdludit |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kdludit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 3,990 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 3,995 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,996 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 3,996 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 April 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,050 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
431 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 173 | 40.1% | |
| 👎 | 127 | 29.5% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 9.05% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 8.58% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 8.12% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 3.02% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 1.62% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 431reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
лето ворк и пиво нравится лето, тем что основные ситуации именно днем, можно не сидеть локин за моником для отработки ситуации, а пить пиво, загорать на пляже и иногда проверять тг за эти два месяца подьебал только мекс с акциями и их накрученным фандосом. из прибыльного за это время, можно было флипать спред SPCX, много движа с GUA/ESPORTS и еще разные спреды, флипы. в данный момент интересно ток спред #DEXE Byb…
👎38😁4👍3❤1
прошел месяц лета(почти) я думал смогу хорошо отдохнуть, но до сих пор уведомления с каждого парсера включены. получается так, месяц на который я ставил что будет самый спокойный и чиловый, оказался лучше отдельных рабочих сезонов. в этом месяце я отработал и отколил много спредов вплоть до 200%, арбитражей , особенно кормят фандинги по несколько дней и получилось найти одну нда, но как я хотел дальше быть в локине…
❤23🔥8🐳6👎5
вышел с #SPACEX. слишком много этот спред у меня отнимал ликвы и настроения. в моменте давали выходить в плюс касарик, но потом сделали ребейз и спреда осталось буквально пару процентов. по итогу -1к хоть и лето, но на рынке очень много ворка, в виде всяких спредов, арбитражей, вот сегодня ночью было две ситуации с ликвидом кита на фарткоине и спред по Н на 50%, сейчас сижу только в #SIREN декс+gate фармлю фандос. …
😁11❤8👍1
апдейт по спреду все биржи рефнули за IPO spacex. один кракен раздал по 600$ на акк и не важно какой взнос. после этого мекс удалил пару SPCXX, которая должна была быть токенизированной, и в этот момент на спот SPACEX(PRE) начали подставлять лимитки по 500к-3.5кк. логика такая что мекс откупит все что продал и будет ждать пока слабые ручки выйдут со спреда. в конце сравняют. готов сидеть еще недели три, четыре.
❤8🐳1
😁 еще один жб спредик по #SPACEX mexc откуп/binance шорт сегодня предпоследний день лаунчпада, на котором уже завтра в сумме раздадут 7кк$ если считать по сумме выкупа. оценка мекса 1.7трлн, против бинанса в 2трлн - спред 17%. завтра после пада типы, которые заносили, порвут спред еще больше и там я планирую залить 20к позы. - плюс этого спреда что фандос нулевой - ипо будет 12ого числа, там и должны сравнять …
👎18❤5🐳1😁1
это пиздец, плохо быть жадным человеком, сидел после кола с профитом 1.7к и остался ждать нормального сравнения, в итоге к вечеру минус был -2.5к, позже дали второй раз выход под 11% тоже в профит, но уже меньше, и последний раз днем, как писал что выводы открыли, давали профит 500 или 600, но я опять решил остаться до конца. был еще вариант депать на кукоин, но за два дня мне так и не вывели ни одного токена. по ар…
❤14🐳2👍1
щас должны сравнять фул. депают с окх/гейта и отправляют на хотвалет кукоина. я сижу до нуля, фандос схавал 600, при сравнение будет 2к чистого
🔥7🤔4❤1
35-40%
https://www.kucoin.com/ru/trade/LAB-USDT откуп кукоин +хедж бинансом https://www.binance.com/en/futures/LABUSDT?ref=293915533
😁5
рынок опять ушел в афк. уже классика, проходили не раз помните, как после такого затишья нам насыпало кучу спредов и фандосиков? ща осталось одна ндашка, которая периодически подкармливает, но хочется нормального ворка и нормальных краймов судя по всему, в таком полуафк режиме мы и доползем до лета. до него неделя, и я сильно сомневаюсь, что начнется какой то фулворк. ща самое время для отдыха - концерты, море, три…
❤19👎12👍3
вылился фул почти под ноль +610$
❤15😁1
доливаюсь в спред 8% https://uacryptoinvest.com/charts?charts=LAB-Bitget-Spot-Bitget-Futures битгет спот откуп битгет фьюч шорт
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kdludit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 323,254 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kd балуется” (@kdludit), 3,990 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdludit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.