8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -221. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,982–20,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:48
20,015
-49
13 Aug 2026, 01:46
20,064
-79
12 Aug 2026, 01:52
20,143
-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:08
20,145
-28
9 Aug 2026, 23:33
20,173
-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:44
20,178
-49
7 Aug 2026, 18:12
20,227
-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:17
20,236
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.9%
avg views ÷ 20,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,600
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
12 (6 May 2026 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
18,600
Reactions total
619
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
940
Videos
196
Links
186
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,834 reactions across 12 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,248
46.5%
🔥
1,010
20.9%
❤🔥
923
19.1%
😍
185
3.83%
👏
114
2.36%
🥰
102
2.11%
👍
79
1.63%
🏆
44
0.91%
⚡
37
0.765%
custom 5298777169701389605
23
0.476%
🤝
22
0.455%
🤩
9
0.186%
🎉
7
0.145%
😭
6
0.124%
🤣
6
0.124%
😁
5
0.103%
👎
4
0.083%
💯
3
0.062%
😢
3
0.062%
🆒
2
0.041%
1 further kind
2
0.041%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, настало время назвать даты нашей следующей встречи! 🥹🫂
Казанский марафон 2027 пройдет с 1 по 3 мая.
В следующем году нас ждет новый формат: каждый из основных стартов получит свой собственный день:
1 мая — 10 км
2 мая — 21.1 км
3 мая — 42.2 км
Детские забеги и дистанция 3 км также войдут в программу. Их даты мы объявим позже.
Регистрацию на Казанский марафон 2027 откроем позже. Обязательно сообщим об эт…
Из заметок сегодняшнего дня:
Каждый раз улыбаемся, когда встречаем участников в официальных футболках СберПрайм Казанского марафона. Очень приятно видеть, что вы берете частичку нашего старта с собой на другие забеги 🥹
Всем привет! На связи команда СберПрайм Казанского марафона.
Сегодня бежим 10 и 42.2 км на СберПрайм марафоне «Белые ночи». Кто сегодня тоже бежит — легких ног!
Если уже ждете свой старт или просто поддерживаете участников на трассе, присылайте кружочки в комментарии. Давайте посмотрим, сколько нас сегодня! 💛
Ровно месяц назад завершился СберПрайм Казанский марафон.
И как символично, что сегодня мы отмечаем Всемирный день бега – спорта, который собирает нас вместе ради эмоций, впечатлений и незабываемых моментов.
Мы уже очень скучаем по той атмосфере и с нетерпением ждем нашей следующей встречи 🫂💛
СберПрайм Казанский марафон 2026 состоялся – и это стало возможным благодаря вам 💛
Чтобы сохранить теплые моменты и сделать следующий марафон еще лучше, нам очень важно узнать ваше мнение. Мы отправили всем участникам письмо со ссылкой на форму обратной связи. Пожалуйста, проверьте свою почту.
Поделитесь своими впечатлениями о марафоне – заполнив короткую анкету, вы поможете сделать следующий еще ярче и комфортнее …
Спасибо нашим партнерам за незабываемый СберПрайм Казанский марафон 2026! 🐉
Подписка СберПрайм – титульный партнер марафона, и вместе с экосистемой Сбера делает путь к марафону удобнее: больше кешбэка, бонусы и скидки у партнеров, кино и спорт в Okko, музыка и аудиокниги в Звуке.
Магнит – генеральный партнер события, один из лидеров российского ритейла. «Магнит» сегодня – не просто крупнейшая сеть магазинов, это за…
🏃♀️➡️ Если после пробежки хочется не бежать по делам, а упасть в объятия кровати в номере отеля – у нас хорошие новости
Разыгрываем пять промокодов на проживание в отелях на Отелло со скидкой до 7000 рублей.
Условия участия:
✔️ Подписаться на телеграм-каналы @otello_travel и @kazan_run
✔️ Нажать кнопку «Забронировать» под этим постом
Итоги подведем 19 мая в 18:00 по Москве с помощью рандомайзера. Результат появи…
Старт, эмоции на дистанции и красивые виды Казани – теперь эти моменты можно пересматривать снова и снова 💛
Мы подготовили для каждого участника персональный видеоролик с несколькими ракурсами и вашим итоговым результатом.
👉 photo.timerman.org/event/KazanMarathon2026D3/video
Если возникнут вопросы или что-то работает некорректно, напишите на [email protected].
Проведение марафона – это огромная работа. И это заслуга не только команды организаторов, но и результат совместных усилий всего города и республики.
От лица всех бегунов хотим сказать большое спасибо Раису Республики Татарстан Рустаму Нургалиевичу Минниханову и Правительству Республики Татарстан, мэру Казани Ильсуру Раисовичу Метшину и всей команде города.
Спасибо МВД Республики Татарстан за безопасность на трассе…
950 волонтеров были рядом с вами в дни СберПрайм Казанского марафона.
Спасибо каждому, кто работал на трассе, в стартовом городке, на пунктах питания и рядом с бегунами все эти дни.
Вы сделали максимум, чтобы десятки тысяч людей просто кайфовали от этого праздника бега 💛
Как думаете, сколько сердец поймали фотографы на дистанциях 21.1 и 42.2 км? 💛
Проверить можно по ссылке – фото уже готовы! Можно искать по стартовому номеру.
Если возникнут вопросы, пишите на [email protected] или @MySportPhotoSupport_bot.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kazan_run. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 233,520 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Казанский марафон” (@kazan_run), 20,015 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazan_run.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
