Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Локальные Кайфарики

Channel

Локальные Кайфарики

@kayfarikigroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,942subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355039240
TypeChannel
Username@kayfarikigroup
Created16 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kayfarikigroup

Growth

2,9422,9512,946.57 August 2026 — 2,950 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,950 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,948 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,950 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,951 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,949 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,947 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,943 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,942 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,941–2,952 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 02:342,942-1
23 Aug 2026, 08:022,943-4
20 Aug 2026, 06:042,947-2
17 Aug 2026, 16:072,949-2
14 Aug 2026, 11:362,951+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:452,950+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:472,948-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:302,950no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:272,950first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 20 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 28s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

795 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33341.9%
🫡16220.4%
😢9311.7%
🤝678.43%
🕊516.42%
💊415.16%
🔥344.28%
🙏141.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 795reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC≈1,610 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/WQmCTaobE8g?si=8AZFUx996lSYxM54 Яб хотів не отримувати такі новини, але війна робить свій хід в цій партії. До зустрічі друже!

🫡626😢4🔥1

20 Apr 2026, 19:13 UTC≈2,950 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Взагалі хочеться інколи так багато сказати за все що у нас відбувається.. Може все таки знов почну щось сюди писати, бо був якийсь умовно «творчій» колапс.

98🙏12💊3😢1

20 Apr 2026, 19:10 UTC≈2,580 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сподіваюсь в найближчому майбутньому це відео будуть розбирати в поліцейських академіях і де там ще це треба під назвою «як не треба робити». По рації було сказано що 2 людей вбито, ці два чудокопа прийшли і не можуть зрозуміти що їм робити, викликали швидку допомогу(щоб що? Щоб їх застрелили?) навіть не питаються вияснити де стрілок де небезпека, подруга в формі з планшетом там телефоном дивитись на малого в крові..

80💊4🙏2

29 Dec 2025, 07:03 UTC≈4,940 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ох естети, архітектори та поцінувачи красивого! Ідіть нахуй.

🤝67💊17😢8🔥2

26 Dec 2025, 13:16 UTC≈4,300 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Якщо мало мотивації, я вам тут заряду приніс. Багато хто думаю вже бачив цей відос, але давайте ще раз подивимось разом.

🫡49💊6🔥5😢43

24 Dec 2025, 15:18 UTC≈3,710 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одразу згадав Покровськ та перше відділення нп, еееех мужичкі які глупі)) як маленькі діти. Прям от як зайшов на нп, була перевірка мужичка який заказав якийсь підозрілий курительний предмет а-ля вейп з якого йшов характерний запах. Штурмові війська очікують ваших помилок.

🕊18😢10🫡5🔥42💊1

24 Dec 2025, 06:38 UTC≈2,900 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Просто фотодамп такий собі

43💊1

24 Dec 2025, 06:33 UTC≈2,680 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Якщо ще не бачили рекомендую зацінити https://youtu.be/p-Ei3o8MpRc?si=xQYhPwIKQrih9K--

19

24 Dec 2025, 06:30 UTC≈2,370 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мені чогось з ранку стало дуже цікаво, не впадло клацніть ху із ху. Подякував

26

24 Dec 2025, 06:30 UTC≈2,570 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Хто тут є?

  1. Військовий37%
  2. Цивільний56%
  3. Нонстоп волонтер7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🫡12

19 Dec 2025, 13:13 UTC≈3,400 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

За парєбріком все гуд.

54🫡22🔥17😢3💊2

21 Nov 2025, 11:14 UTC≈4,070 views79 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почитав ті пункти «мирних перемовин» виглядає більше як капітуляція під наглядом «союзника». Уявіть зараз зупинити війну і через пару років все почнеться по новій.. І без різниці через 2 роки чи 5..різниця тільки в тому що тим кому зараз 15р через 5 буде 20 років і вони будуть змушені піти воювати в ще гірших умовах ніж ми в 22..якщо виконати усі пункти.

😢57🫡7💊5🔥5🕊41

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kayfarikigroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2025, 06:30 UTCAnonymous Poll563 voters

Хто тут є?

  1. Військовий37%
  2. Цивільний56%
  3. Нонстоп волонтер7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,154,162 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Локальные Кайфарики” (@kayfarikigroup), 2,942 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kayfarikigroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.