• Место, где ты открываешь в себе силу первого впечатления.
• Создаю персональный визуальный образ, который выделит тебя среди конкурентов.
• Игра «Кто ты в жизни» ⤵️ @katygans_visualbot
| Связь со мной — @katy_neo
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 09:03
263
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:03
263
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 263 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
14 (25 June 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
280
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
830
Videos
414
Links
102
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
171 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
38.0%
🔥
51
29.8%
👌
22
12.9%
👍
17
9.94%
custom 5345938818304320124
8
4.68%
❤🔥
5
2.92%
🙏
2
1.17%
🥰
1
0.585%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Одна из моих любимых работ из селфи проекта.
Вот уже 6 лет я снимаю себя. Это такой нежный роман с женской сущностью.
Мне бы хотелось что бы обратили внимание на движение которое передаются от кадра в кадр.
Такая волна удовольствия от существования очарования женственности 🥰 мы же здесь про образ.
Как объятие пальчиков сухого цветка пересекается с объятием пальчиков тонкой талии. Почувствуйте эту волну нежности.
…
Как вам новый нежный образ. 🥰
Решила примерить этот пудровый с розовым жемчугом.
Когда то в юности я покупала его для мамы во Вьетнаме.
Ловцы жемчуга проходили около нашего кафе и я конечно не устояла.
Тогда я купила чёрный и розовый и вот спустя много лет я могу носить жемчуг. Возраст позволяет 🫣
Девочки, а что вы стали носить с возрастом, ну кто уже так за 40 , что раньше себе не позволяли ?
Вот я романтичес…
Последние годы словом «выгорание» начали объяснять примерно всё. Не хочется идти на работу? Выгорание. Не можешь заставить себя тренироваться? Выгорание. Не открыл ноутбук два дня подряд? Тоже оно. Звучит красиво. Почти как универсальная индульгенция. Хотя есть одна странность. Предприниматель, который пять лет строит компанию своей мечты, может работать по шестнадцать часов в сутки и не чувствовать себя «сгоревшим».…
Недавно познакомилась с очень любопытным бизнес стратегом Анатолием Сульяновым.
Сидела на против него на первых рядах и просто открыв рот слушала. Он вел разборы бизнесов. Не то что бы мой новый гуру, но я буду к нему прислушиваться.
Со стратегией и продвижением у него все очень круто и с количеством подписчиков ( больше ляма с соц сетях тоже 🫣)
Эта статья очень четко передает мое состояние сейчас.
Возможно те мы…
ТЫ ЭКСПЕРТ И ТЕБЕ НУЖЕН КОНТЕНТ
И тадам🔥
Недавно снимала
➡️прекрасную женщину психолога Элину
➡️которая занимается семейными парами
кому сильно можно прям к ней ножками дойти
И конечно девочки , кто хочет и давно думал об обновление своего экспертного контента
писать сюда свои хотелки ➡️@katy_neo
Как понять, какой визуальный образ вы демонстрируйте в соц сетях ?
🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢
ШАГ 1️⃣ЭКСПРЕСС РАЗБОР ВАШЕГО ОБРАЗА
Говорят, что книгу не судят по обложке.
Но в соцсетях всё наоборот.
Представь, что у вас внутри ♾ гениальный роман,
но обложка выглядит как поваренная книга 90-х.
Люди просто не открывают её.
Разбор, который я провожу ➡️
это анализ вашей «обложки».
Мы поймем:
⬆️почему читатель проходит мимо
⬆️и как …
4 ЛЕТНИЕ ПОЗЫ ДЛЯ БОЛЬШОГО ГОРОДА
Сохраняй и отправляй подружке, лето в разгаре☀️
🟣Kанал в MAX
🟣Здесь марафон, в котором вы узнаете формулу успеха вашего образа
Знаете, какой самый дорогой вид мазохизма в бизнесе?
Ответ будет в конце моих этих мыслей 🫣
Сидишь ты, умная, красивая, с 17-летним опытом. Вроде всё знаешь, все тренды изучила. Но..всегда есть какое то но..
На днях я упаковала свою «визуальную броню» в чемодан и отправилась на КОНСУЛЬТАРИУМ-НЕТВОРКИНГ 11.0 ,там я устроила своему мозгу настоящий спа-день из стратегических сессий 🤯и пообщалась с людьми, которые уже…
❤5🔥5👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @katygans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катя Ганс • Про • Образ” (@katygans), 263 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katygans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
