Channel
@katyapokarpp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
80subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002602954178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katyapokarpp |
| Description | Канал психолога Кати о психологии поведения. Помогаю понять и менять привычки и реакции, которые мешают жить. https://taplink.cc/katyaevkina |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katyapokarpp |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 20:22 | 80 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 66.7% | |
| custom 5296373139066877225 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5296304239201509885 | 4 | 14.8% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Совместно с Alter мы провели вебинар о самооценке, и теперь его можно посмотреть в записи🙂 На вебинаре мы как раз разбирали, как формируется самооценка, почему самокритика иногда кажется «полезной», но на деле часто усиливает тревогу и стыд, и что можно начать делать, чтобы отношения с собой становились устойчивее. Запись вебинара можно получить тут. И ещё важное: после вебинара мы открыли набор в терапевтическую …
❤3
Всем привет🙂 Завтра в 19:30 пройдёт мой бесплатный вебинар для Альтер, посвящённый самооценке📱 Вокруг самооценки всегда много споров, расхождений и мифов. Давайте вместе разберёмся, как формируется самооценка, почему она может так сильно влиять на нашу жизнь и какие первые шаги помогают выстраивать более устойчивое и бережное отношение к себе❤️ Регистрация тут Буду рада видеть вас на вебинаре🥰
custom 52963731390668772255
За плохое поведение pinned a video
Во многом про это и будет наша группа⭐️ Не про «просто полюбите себя» и не про обещание стать человеком, который больше никогда в себе не сомневается. Скорее про то, чтобы понять, как устроена ваша самооценка, почему включается самокритика, где вы становитесь против самого себя и как постепенно учиться быть с собой иначе.
❤5
🔘А у меня классные новости❗️ Совместно с Альтер мы запускаем первую терапевтическую группу по работе с низкой самооценкой❤️🩹 Я несколько раз садилась писать текст о ней и ловила себя на том, что всё время получается что-то слишком правильное: для кого группа, что будет на встречах, какие темы мы будем разбирать и что можно будет забрать с собой после этих недель. Всё это правда важно, и я как раз рассказываю об эт…
❤6
За плохое поведение pinned a photo
Про подростков часто говорят: «это просто сложный возраст», «это гормоны», «перебесятся». Но за этим обобщением легко не заметить, насколько это на самом деле уязвимый и важный период. Спустя 4 года вышел 3 сезон «Эйфории», который продолжает разговор уже не только о подростковом кризисе, но и о его последствиях. Смотрели? В карточках — разбор сериала «Эйфория» с психологической точки зрения: почему это не просто …
❤3
— Иногда именно так и находится свое место: не в точке полной уверенности, а в движении к тому, что почему‑то отзывается в вас сильнее всего. Сегодня делимся историей Екатерины Евкиной, клинического психолога, студентки курса «Схема-терапия», выпускницы курсов: 🌟«Профессия психолог-консультант», 🌟«Доказательная психотерапия РПП». История о большом интересе и смелости пробовать новое. Получилось интервью, после проч…
custom 52963042392015098854❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @katyapokarpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“За плохое поведение” (@katyapokarpp), 80 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katyapokarpp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.