Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Katya_komilfo

Channel

Katya_komilfo

@katya_komilfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001618424553
TypeChannel
Username@katya_komilfo
DescriptionЕкатерина Кашутчик - ТВК
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/katya_komilfo

Growth

2327 Aug 2026, 19:53 — 232 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:05 — 232 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:538 Aug 2026, 10:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:05232no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:53232first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11576.2%
🤯138.61%
42.65%
42.65%
😁42.65%
🔥31.99%
🎉21.32%
👎21.32%
😢21.32%
💘10.662%
🥰10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2022 to 17 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2022, 12:32 UTC≈2,010 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Честно: это лето было не самым фееричным в моей жизни. Планы срывались, погода изображала октябрь, приходилось решать проблемы, о существовании которых ты даже не догадывался, выползали из небытия конфликты, о которых ты и не знал. Море причин это лето не любить и слать ко всем чертям. Но не стану. Что-то безусловно прекрасное в нем тоже было. И я даже не про Питер! Вы ведь такого поворота ждали? 😂 Я про театры. На

👍6😢2💘1🥰1

8 Jun 2022, 05:23 UTC≈2,200 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Взяла паузу, чтобы почитать комментарии людей. Начиталась, ещё больше убедилась, что все было честно и правильно, хоть и неприятно О чем я? В деле Красноярского хлеба поставлена точка. Руководитель, которая закрывала цеха и давила в дверях съёмочную группу, получила наказание по статье «препятствование законной деятельности журналиста, с использованием служебного положения и сопряжённое с насилием». Наказание: 2 го

👍45

9 May 2022, 05:21 UTC≈1,920 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всё утро пишу в заметки то, за что сейчас сажают Своё мнение Честно, искренне, и теми самыми словами, а не суррогатами, типо спецоперации. Пишу, чтобы ком в горле меня не задушил. Но ком всё равно не уходит. Хочется проорать, как больно в этом году отмечать годовщину Великой победы. Жутко больно. Но эту боль больше нельзя даже озвучить, чтобы не залететь под статью. Постараюсь выразить вот так. Ветераны Великой во

👍184🔥31

25 Mar 2022, 09:04 UTC≈2,390 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А в 12.02 смерть опровергают. Ещё страшнее

🤯7😁4

25 Mar 2022, 09:02 UTC≈2,340 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот так в современном мире. У человека есть только 59 минут покоя, и о твоей смерти знает уже весь мир. В 10.45 не стало политика В 11.44 об этом написали Я тоже новостник, и понимаю, почему так. Но как-то стало не по себе.

21 Mar 2022, 14:28 UTC≈2,660 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stalin_gulag

Теперь официально: российский суд запретил Facebook и Instagram, признав Meta экстремистской организацией Какая деградация правовых понятий произошла в России: за несколько лет экстремист, из злодея с оружием в руках, превратился в домохозяйку с рецептами сырников и фоточками котиков @stalin_gulag

👍81

21 Mar 2022, 14:28 UTC≈2,120 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чуда не случилось, здравый смысл предсказуемо не победил.

🤯51

21 Mar 2022, 10:06 UTC≈2,000 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalive

❗️«Деятельность организации Meta направлена против России и ее Вооруженных сил. Просим запретить деятельность Мета и обязать исполнить это решение немедленно», — сказал в Тверском суде представитель ФСБ Игорь Ковалевский. ДАННОЕ СООБЩЕНИЕ (МАТЕРИАЛ) СОЗДАНО И (ИЛИ) РАСПРОСТРАНЕНО ИНОСТРАННЫМ СРЕДСТВОМ МАССОВОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИИ, ВЫПОЛНЯЮЩИМ ФУНКЦИИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА, И (ИЛИ) РОССИЙСКИМ ЮРИДИЧЕСКИМ ЛИЦОМ, ВЫПОЛНЯЮЩИМ ФУНК

👍4👎21

21 Mar 2022, 09:53 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 8 August 2026

Meta заявила в суде, что уже отменила свою политику (из-за которой и начались все проблемы) и заявила о недопустимости русофобии и любого хейтспич.

21 Mar 2022, 09:50 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Риа новости: ⚡️Граждане в случае запрета Meta НЕ БУДУТ привлекаться к ответственности только за то, что пользуются Facebook и Instagram, заявил прокурор в суде

👍4

21 Mar 2022, 09:03 UTC≈1,180 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Из зала суда: Meta просит прекратить рассмотрение заявления Генпрокуратуры о запрете деятельности, так как российские суды не имеют на это компетенции. Это может делать только суд по месту регистрации в США.

👍2

21 Mar 2022, 09:02 UTC≈1,010 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тверской суд Москвы начал рассматривать иск о признании Meta (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp) экстремистской организацией и запрете ее деятельности в России, передает корреспондент РИА Новости из зала суда. Иск рассматривает лично председатель суда (Ольга Солопова) - это довольно редкий случай, хотя не исключительный. В заседании участвуют два прокурора, представители ФСБ и Роскомнадзора. Интересы Meta представляют

🎉2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katya_komilfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Mar 2022, 00:29 UTCAnonymous Poll163 voters

Следите за блокировкой соцсетей?

  1. Да, жду результатов суда30%
  2. Нет, уже смирился42%
  3. И так понятно, что все закроют28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2022 to 17 August 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Katya_komilfo” (@katya_komilfo), 232 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katya_komilfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.