🌻 Я Катя - специалист по личному бренду.
Помогаю экспертам построить систему продаж, основанную на глубинных идеях бренда и Души.
❤️ А еще поддерживаю осознанный бизнес, полный любви.
Консультации и сотрудничество: @katsmirn
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 12:15
49
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:27
49
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
52
Videos
29
Links
30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
24s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
320 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
103
32.2%
🔥
83
25.9%
👍
73
22.8%
🥰
32
10.0%
👏
20
6.25%
🤩
7
2.19%
😁
2
0.625%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2022 to 26 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
382
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
160
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2022 to 26 October 2022. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Маркировка рекламы в Telegram
Вопрос подвис в воздухе после изменений в законе "О рекламе", которые вступили в силу 1 сентября. Подробнее писала об этом здесь.
В чем суть #новости сегодня: неразбериха в ответах ФАС. Давайте разбираться.
Ещё 22 октября я написала ободряющую новость на канал, даже картинку красивую сделала. Тогда Федеральная антимонопольная служба дала ответ на обращение Ассоциации Блогеров и Агентс…
Кто-то уже поменял свое мнение о Telegram Premium благодаря моей статье 👆
А если вы до сих пор не в теме - пройдите опрос и после него прочтите обзор: моё мнение о премиуме и нововведениях.
Telegram Premium - стоит ли своих денег?
Об этом я написала статью с разбором главных функций тарифа, по каждой высказала свое мнение.
⭐️ В статье напомнила главное правило продаж и объяснила, почему премиум, на мой взгляд, не оправдал изначальных надежд команды Telegram.
Наслаждайтесь чтивом: как всегда увлекательно, структурно, глубоко :)
И актуально - голоса в опросе выше разделились поровну 😄👌
P. S. Давайте…
Уух, написала классный обзор Telegram Premium - там и про продажи, и про брендинг, и про идеи команды Telegram, и, конечно же, про функции за подписку :)
Иными словами, ответ на вопрос: стоит ли оно того?
Завтра утром будет на канале ✨ Всем спокойной ночи и самых сказочных снов ❤️
Про жизненный путь
Я в последнее время много говорила об ответственности. Почему? Это часть внутренней глубины, которая влияет на все.
Ответственность определяет выбор. А выбор создает жизнь.
Мне кажется, у каждого свой уникальный путь. Сейчас самое время раскрывать свое призвание, светить через любимое дело:
Ведь тьма есть отсутствие света
Передо мной недавно встал вопрос: какой дорогой пойти? Дорог так много и…
Про внутренний ритм
Я недавно увидела классную фразу: можно стремиться и действовать, а можно существовать и воплощать.
Не знаю, как вы, а я почувствовала бОльшую силу во второй фразе. В ней есть спокойствие, в ней есть позиция "Я уже Творец".
В наших с вами обстоятельствах очень важно уметь чувствовать разницу между внутренним сопротивлением и внутренним ритмом жизни.
Иногда дела откладываются, что-то идет иначе…
Про ответственность: часть 2
Вижу, что, несмотря на объемную аргументацию, некоторые восприняли мой пост как мантру "я сама".
Нет, друзья, я не против делегирования - и поэтому в конце поста были галочки с примерами ✅
Делегировать нужно уметь с умом.
Я говорила о том, что "сваливаться" полностью на других не нужно никогда - даже если вы вообще в чем-то не разбираетесь.
Всегда можно вложить время + энергию и найт…
Субботний вечер приятных новостей
Канал перевалил за 100 подписчиков 🥳
И по иронии сразу кто-то отписался
Как обещала, показываю, с чего начинала - радовалась каждому их вас. Знаю лично каналы многих. Публика тут собирается осознанная 💫
Последняя неделя у меня была эмоционально насыщенной. Я не постила, потому что была максимально не в ресурсе, да и дел навалилось огого. Один день даже ни с кем не разговаривала -…
❤6👍4🔥3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katsmirn_smm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Возвращаюсь к маркетингу. И сразу новость: комментинг от лица канала стал платным. Что думаете?
🤩 Классно, у меня и так был премиум.28%
😨 Как так-то? Зря..50%
🥲 Ну что ж, пойду покупать премиум.22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2022 to 26 October 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катя про личный бренд с душой” (@katsmirn_smm), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katsmirn_smm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
