Channel
@katrinmoonlife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
94subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002076055296 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katrinmoonlife |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katrinmoonlife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 94 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 95 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 95 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katrinmoonlife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Я не меркантильная, я просто устала выживать» Сегодня многие женщины действительно много думают о деньгах. Не потому что они “меркантильные”. А потому что деньги всё чаще становятся не про роскошь, а про безопасность, свободу, спокойствие и возможность не жить в постоянном напряжении. Но как только женщина признаётся, что ей важны деньги, в ответ она часто слышит обвинение: “Ты слишком меркантильная”. “Ты всё св…
❤4🔥1
Ну что, а мы стартанули наше исследование!!! Это было мощно 💪
❤2
Я начинаю большое исследование на тему женского счастья. Мне интересно понять: от чего женщина по-настоящему счастлива? Не внешне “всё хорошо”: дом, семья, дети, работа, планы, красивая картинка. А внутри. 🔸Когда женщина чувствует себя живой. 🔸Когда она слышит свои желания. 🔸Когда ей не нужно постоянно выживать, доказывать, держаться и быть удобной. 🔸Когда она не просто выполняет роли, а живёт свою жизнь. Я хочу…
❤2
‼️Мы живём в мире, где стало слишком много знаний, практик, техник и “новых решений”. Но в какой-то момент наступает честная точка: ещё одна информация уже не возвращает спокойствие. Ещё одна практика не меняет жизнь, если она остаётся разовым импульсом. Ещё один “новый ключ” не открывает старую дверь, если каждый день я продолжаю жить по тем же привычкам. Настоящее восстановление начинается не с усложнения. А с в…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
t.me/KatrinSpaceBot/nerv
👍1
Вчера на практикуме говорили о том, почему иногда дело не в лени, не в слабой мотивации и не в “неправильном мышлении”. Очень часто мы просто долго живём в режиме выживания: в острой мобилизации или уже в истощении. И тогда тело, нервная система, эмоции и мысли начинают работать совсем иначе. Я записала короткое голосовое о том, почему так сложно выйти из этого состояния и почему важно начинать не с давления на себ…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰3
Вчера после оффлайн-практикума я очень ярко почувствовала, как даже сильные положительные эмоции создают напряжение в теле и нервной системе. Даже когда событие вдохновляет, наполняет и даёт много энергии - телу всё равно нужно время, чтобы вернуться в расслабление. И вот именно об этом я хочу поговорить с вами на онлайн-практикуме во вторник, 19 мая, в 11:30 по Лос-Анджелесу. Тема: “Как возвращать себя в расслабл…
❤2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3
Как вернуть себе равновесие, когда вокруг тревожно В этом голосовом - о том, почему мы уходим в режим выживания и перестаём чувствовать радость, расслабление и свои желания. Во вторник проведу бесплатный практикум на эту тему. Приходите, если чувствуете, что вам важно вернуть себе опору, спокойствие и контакт с жизнью. 19 мая (вторник) в 11:30 ЛА Ссылка на регистрацию - ниже: https://katrinmoonlife.com/anketa_co…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @katrinmoonlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,027,977 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Katrin MoonLife 🌗” (@katrinmoonlife), 94 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katrinmoonlife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.