3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 356–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:53
369
+11
7 Aug 2026, 19:58
358
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:31
358
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.4%
avg views ÷ 369 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (23 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
773
Reactions total
67
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
335 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
245
73.1%
💘
63
18.8%
🍓
16
4.78%
🕊
9
2.69%
🎉
2
0.597%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Бахилыч – русскоязычный душка-художник! Стиль очень миленький, анатомия напоминает чибиков, которых автор также часто рисует. Среди соцсетей ведёт вк, телеграм, тикток и X
Рисует в основном коммишки, среди них обычные и чиби арты, эмоуты, и пнг модели
😊😀😊 😍🥲🥰😗🥹😘🥳❤️
Работает одновременно в двух программах: Clip Studio Paint и Procreate🤯
Начинает с простенького и чистенького скетча, намечая сразу ак…
Друзья!🌼
Лично извиняюсь за задержку постов, прошу потерпеть ещё пару дней, пока мы не начнём их догонять!
У вашей Кейти сейчас довольно большое событие в жизни происходит, поэтому возможности много времени уделять школе последний месяц сложно🤩
🧸 БАЗОВЫЕ КИСТИ ДЛЯ ВАШИХ АРТОВ
Какими кистями вы обычно пользуетесь? Предлагаю посмотреть на небольшой набор базовых кистей, которые я вам рекомендую!
🌼 Жёсткая перовая кисть
Да, это самая базовая кисточка, которую можно представить! Но как раз поэтому многие пренебрегают её использованием, а ведь она очень хороша для покраски арта, а после небольших настроек может стать лучшим вариантом для лайна
🌼 Аэрограф
Да-д…
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Tagi – англоязычная художница, очень популярна в тиктоке и запретограмме (а ещё ведёт ютуб аккаунт)
Имеет очень воздушный и чистый стиль, а также очень щедра на взаимодействие с аудиторией и туториалы
😊😀😊 😍🥲🥰😗🥹😘🥳❤️
Работает на экраннике в clip studio paint!
Начинает с грубого скетча, быстренько переходя к более чистому скетче-лайну и заливает все сплошным цветом
Затем, переходит к отдельному покра…
Друзья! Сейчас наблюдаются небольшие неполадки с просмотром уроков и чатами на нашем сайте💔
Приносим свои извинения и скоро вернемся с хорошими новостями🤩
☺️ СКЕТЧ ЛАССО-ЗАЛИВКОЙ
А вы когда-нибудь слышали о методе скетчинга с помощью лассо-заливки? Давайте окунёмся поподробнее!
🤔Популяризировался этот метод на самом деле совсем недавно на просторах тиктока, хотя до этого использовался в основном профессиональными художниками приоритетно для фона и основных силуэтов. Но мы на месте не стоим, и сейчас этот метод слегка видоизменился! Посмотрим?
🌼Суть в том, что вы рису…
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
kivsomnii (Кився) – русскоязычная художница, ведёт тг, тикток, X и ещё пару соцсетей (частично на английском), рекомендую глянуть красивейшую карточку
Для заработка занимается продажей адоптов в Ping!
😊😀😊 😍🥲🥰😗🥹😘🥳❤️
Работает в ClipStudioPaint EX на экраннике Huion Kamvas Pro 19!
Стиль у художницы очень объёмный! Не смотря на большую стилизацию и крупные глазки, рендер добавляет воздуха и нехилого р…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katinlovestudies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🖌«КИСТОЧКА» – онлайн школа рисования || Обучение рисованию, полезные материалы” (@katinlovestudies), 369 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katinlovestudies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.