Channel
@kathrin_kaztay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,614subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001228302301 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kathrin_kaztay |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kathrin_kaztay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 1,614 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 1,620 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 1,620 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (7 February 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 370 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
80 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 63.7% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что реально помогло мне не раствориться: ✅ 1. Я планировала день с вечера Каждый вечер, перед сном, я расписывала завтрашний день до мелочей — записи в поликлинику, дела, звонки. Утром с детьми не остаётся ресурса на решения "а что сейчас делать" — решения нужно принимать заранее, пока голова ещё ясная. 2. Я делала заготовки — не только для еды, но и для жизни Заготовки продуктов на несколько дней вперёд экономили …
❤13👍3🔥1
5 декретов за 10 лет. Как я не потеряла в этом себя, а нашла. Если посчитать месяцы беременностей и первых лет с каждым — я почти не выходила из состояния, когда не принадлежу только себе. И честно — были моменты, когда я не понимала, как мне собрать себя. Но вот что я поняла спустя эти годы: декрет — это не пауза в развитии. Это просто другая скорость и другие правила игры.
❤3👍2
Доброе утро, красавицы! ✨ Лайфхак №1. Начните день со стакана теплой воды. Добавьте в воду несколько капель лимона (если нет противопоказаний) или просто выпейте теплую воду натощак. Это помогает восполнить потерю жидкости после сна и поддерживать здоровый вид кожи. ✨ Лайфхак №2. Добавьте полезный напиток. Сегодня попробуйте выпить: • травяной чай (ромашка, мята); • воду с ягодами или огурцом; • коллаген Atomy или …
❤18👍7
Channel photo removed
Техника «Я - сообщение»
👍7
Когда-то я искренне не понимала, почему с детьми возникают конфликты, а в личных отношениях так сложно достичь взаимопонимания. Мне казалось, что я объясняю правильно. Но меня будто не слышали. Во время обучения в Московском институте психоанализа и изучения коучинга я поняла одну важную вещь: часто проблема не в людях, а в способе общения. Одним из самых полезных инструментов для меня стала техника «Я-сообщение» …
❤9👍1
Очень заряжаюсь энергией когда хожу по любимым магазинам и впитываю эстетику и изобилие. Составляю для себя wish list и обязательно проставляю галочки, если вещь действительно запала мне в душу ✨
❤6👍1
Две практики для изменения жизни от Джей Шетти: Диета от чужих мнений (Opinion fast): Попробуйте один день записывать, как часто вы ищете чужого одобрения (что надеть, что съесть, куда пойти). А затем на 7 дней полностью откажитесь от «краудсорсинга» решений в общих чатах. Верните пульт управления жизнью себе. Оценка дня по усилиям, а не по результату: Каждый вечер записывайте одно действие, которое потребовало от …
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kathrin_kaztay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катрин Казтай” (@kathrin_kaztay), 1,614 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kathrin_kaztay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.