Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❄️ KatExtra | Официальный канал

Channel

❄️ KatExtra | Официальный канал

@katextra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,545subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001212143985
TypeChannel
Username@katextra
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/katextra

Growth

6,4796,5456,5126 August 2026 — 6,479 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,479 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,481 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,484 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,487 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,490 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,491 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,489 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,498 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,491 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,545 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,469–6,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:016,545+54
31 Aug 2026, 22:376,491-7
28 Aug 2026, 16:266,498+9
25 Aug 2026, 11:526,489-2
22 Aug 2026, 11:356,491+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:126,490+3
16 Aug 2026, 20:056,487+3
13 Aug 2026, 02:576,484+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:316,481+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:006,479no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:526,479first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,341 reactions across 19 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬67920.3%
👍65919.7%
62418.7%
🔥35610.7%
🤣3008.98%
🎉2467.36%
😱1364.07%
🎄752.24%
🤡621.86%
😢300.898%
👏250.748%
😐220.658%
170.509%
🤨170.509%
🫡150.449%
😁140.419%
👌120.359%
🐳70.21%
👀70.21%
🗿70.21%
12 further kinds310.928%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,341 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
140
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
107
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katextra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 December 2024 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC≈5,790 views133 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У меня и у пользователей в комментариях под предыдущим постом заработала загрузка фото. Проверяем! Видимо, ВК наконец-то починил и даже не доломал окончательно

👍91🔥2614🎉2

11 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC≈6,140 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Недолго музыка играла? В последней версии мода снова всплыли проблемы, на сей раз с невозможностью загрузки фотографий в личные сообщения (а может, и не только туда). Пока точно непонятно, откуда растут ноги у проблемы, но, если полагаться на отзывы пользователей, у которых проблем нет либо они есть не на всех аккаунтах, можно сделать вывод, что проблема временная и ВК просто что-то в очередной раз случайно сломал.

👍68🤬3821😱6😐41

8 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC≈7,860 views114 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍6621🔥21🎉5🤡1

8 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC≈8,020 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥8640👍18

8 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC≈7,350 views151 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026

KatExtra 133.4 v1 ✏ Переезд на версию Kate Mobile 133.4 ❗ Эта версия основана на моде от Fellin, который содержит различные исправления того, что сломал ВК (подробнее читайте выше на канале). Fellin сообщает о том, что в моде не работают push-уведомления, а также что угодно и где угодно может оказаться сломанным, т.к. это большая и сложная работа и ошибки неизбежны. ❗ Обновление хоть и может технически установитьс

115👍18🔥132😐2🤬1

27 Apr 2026, 20:01 UTC≈12,800 views481 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

К сожалению, я оказался прав - доступ был закрыт со стороны ВК намеренно. Разработчик Кейта опубликовал пост в группе в ВК с информацией о проблеме. Коротко - ВК специально отрезали доступ к части функционала ради "безопасности" вас, дорогие пользователи. В посте разработчик оставил ссылку на диалог с поддержкой, на случай если вы захотите сообщить поддержке ВК своё мнение об их действиях. В целом, если наберётся мно

🤬368🤡61👍16😐118🗿7🤨6😱2

27 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC≈11,000 views271 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня многие столкнулись с ошибкой "Unknown method passed" в разделе аудио или какими-то иными проявлениями неработоспособности тех или иных функций кейта. Это ошибка (или же намеренные действия) со стороны самого вк, такое же поведение повторяется и в самом кейте (не в экстре) на разных версиях, и в некоторых других неофициальных приложениях. В официальном клиенте и модах, основанных на нём, всё работает. Всё что

😱112🤬108👍19147🤨6😐5

24 Feb 2026, 12:55 UTC≈16,400 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

66👍30🔥15

24 Feb 2026, 12:54 UTC≈16,400 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

84👍40🔥28

24 Feb 2026, 12:54 UTC≈15,100 views111 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

KatExtra 130.2 v2 ✏ Исправлена работа даты регистрации аккаунтов ✏ Исправлена работа псевдонимов

👍60🎉3310🤨4🔥3😱1

24 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC≈14,100 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

63🎉19👍16😱4

24 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC≈13,900 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

98🎉30🔥21👍13😱5🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @katextra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Feb 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll2,220 voters approx.

В последнее время ВК всё больше и больше урезает функционал неофициальных клиентов, в том числе Кейта, вплоть до проблем со входом в аккаунт. Считаете ли вы целесообразным поддерживать (воскресить) дальнейшую жизнь мода?

  1. Да, всё ещё пользуюсь Кейтом и не собираюсь переходить на официальный/какой-либо иной клиент92%
  2. Нет, официальный клиент от лукавого, Кейт переживёт всех нас, даёшь Кейт, свободу Кейту!8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❄️ KatExtra | Официальный канал” (@katextra), 6,545 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katextra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.