Channel
@katevoynova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,293subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001353536656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katevoynova |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katevoynova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 3,293 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 3,300 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:29 | 3,299 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 3,310 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 3,316 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 3,314 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 3,314 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,165 |
| Reactions total | 602 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
602 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5767114955006414729 | 389 | 64.6% | |
| custom 5764941465331437586 | 201 | 33.4% | |
| custom 5765107294018735583 | 12 | 1.99% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katevoynova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хочу, чтобы этот трек и «хореография» на лонгборде были запечатлены еще одним постом у меня в профиле Иногда хочется просто повторить то, что уже придумано, чтобы насладится своим же творчеством без груза «надо сделать что-то новое» абсолютно каждый раз, когда я выхожу кататься - это только добавляет удовольствия и вдохновения придумать что-то интересное в следующий раз 🩵
custom 576711495500641472918custom 57649414653314375867
Попросила снять меня со стороны, чтобы посмотреть, как выглядит лайн, который я начала готовить для соревнований в эту субботу, а Тимур сказал, что это вполне себе готовое видео для профиля К слову, в итоге, я все переделала - а то получилось слишком сложно-пируэтно Впервые за последние годы начинаю готовится к контесту буквально за пару дней - это непросто, потому что надо успеть найти баланс между стабильностью, …
custom 576711495500641472935custom 576494146533143758613custom 57651072940187355835
Уже в эту субботу, 8 августа, будут соревнования по лонгборд денсингу и фристайлу в Москве в Лужниках Их анонсировали буквально за неделю, и сейчас я начала готовиться и придумывать линии (сделать это за пару дней - та ещё задачка) Вот тут подробная информация, тык Контесты - это всегда очень интересно: и для участников, чтобы продемонстрировать свои умения и пообщаться с другими райдерами, и для зрителей, чтобы в…
custom 576494146533143758625custom 57671149550064147296
Совсем редко стало сюда что-то писать, хотя очень делится своими мыслями именно в текстовой форме Вот уже больше 4 месяцев подряд я ежедневно делаю посты в соц сетях, и думаю, основная причина моего малого присутствия в канале заключается именно в этом Каждый день ищу новый трек -> придумываю новый лайн -> снимаю его -> монтирую -> придумываю подпись -> выкладываю на 5 разных площадок В целом, весь этот процесс ст…
custom 576711495500641472923custom 576494146533143758611
Обожаю, когда соединяются воедино красивое и сложное - я вижу в этом особую эстетику «труднодоступного прекрасного», где нельзя считирить и применить какие-то хитрости, а нужно просто большое количество часов практики и, конечно, много любви к своему делу (а как иначе?) 🪄✨
custom 576711495500641472937custom 576494146533143758617
На вид вроде самая обычная дорожка - но как же красиво она смотрится, благодаря контрасту тени и света! ☀️
custom 576711495500641472939custom 576494146533143758614
Все пренепременно сбудется! 🪄✨
custom 576711495500641472948custom 576494146533143758621
Все грани моего катания в одном видео: трюки, пируэты, разная по вайбу музыка и хорошее настроение 😜🤘
custom 576711495500641472954custom 576494146533143758617
Август - идеальный месяц, чтобы всецело посвятить себя катанию и выжать все самое лучшее из последнего месяца лета! Я уже начала ⚡️
custom 576711495500641472952custom 576494146533143758618
Какой красивый свет сегодня поймали в Парке Победы! 🪄
custom 576494146533143758639custom 576711495500641472927
Наделала трюков в стиле тяп-ляп, чтобы успеть в пятиминутною безоблачную паузу и поймать как можно больше солнечных лучей⛅️ Зато под музыку все подошло!
custom 576711495500641472950custom 576494146533143758619custom 57651072940187355837
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @katevoynova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 838,070 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KATE VOYNOVA” (@katevoynova), 3,293 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katevoynova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.