Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ка тет

@katet19

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,656subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003757706689
TypeChannel
Username@katet19
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 8 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katet19

Growth

2,6542,6602,6576 August 2026 — 2,654 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,654 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,656 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,660 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,656 subscribers2,6566 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,653–2,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:462,656-4
10 Aug 2026, 15:262,660+4
7 Aug 2026, 09:522,656+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:072,654no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:512,654first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.7%
avg views ÷ 2,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
1 post measured
Reaction rate
13.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held10 (8 June 202621 July 2026)
Views total2,010
Reactions total270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,653 reactions across 10 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥36021.8%
🔥34020.6%
25115.2%
custom 53394315906635912781307.86%
custom 53368577584970201241207.26%
custom 53372523672072754401126.78%
🥰975.87%
👍674.05%
custom 5337264586389230203472.84%
custom 5336798152940886414271.63%
custom 5336874723617839987241.45%
🏆181.09%
💋171.03%
custom 5350382670641666752150.907%
custom 533947941512443017380.484%
😁70.423%
👾60.363%
🤝30.181%
🎉20.121%
😐20.121%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,653reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 10 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katet19. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,010 views270 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хорошего дня, дорогие❤️❤️❤️

❤‍🔥148🔥62custom 533685775849702012419🏆13custom 53372523672072754409custom 53367981529408864148💋6custom 53368747236178399875

4 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC≈3,010 views171 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ph📸: tunes_vision

🔥8935custom 533943159066359127819custom 533725236720727544010💋7🏆5custom 53503826706416667524custom 53367981529408864142

26 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC≈3,700 views158 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

RIPBEAT х Айрат - Деревенские обряды Вышел новый альбом у пацанов. Сам еще не успел послушать- заценю обязательно. Кого только нет на этом релизе, с огромным любопытством ознакомлюсь, внутри кстати есть и мой куплет.

👍63🔥50custom 5336857758497020124239custom 53503826706416667526custom 53372523672072754404custom 53394794151244301732🤝1

25 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC≈3,000 views223 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хорошего дня❤️❤️❤️

136🔥39custom 533687472361783998719custom 533679815294088641413custom 53372523672072754405custom 53394794151244301735🥰4❤‍🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,910 views202 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥96custom 533725236720727544050🥰19🔥167👾6custom 53367981529408864144custom 53368577584970201244

11 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,740 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лежбище бегемотов Солнце висело низко и лениво, как переспелый плод, расплескав по берегу желток зноя. На припеке было тепло, только этого было мало. Вездесущий, тягучий зной, обволакивал огромные, словно вылепленные из сырой глины, туши. Вода в затоне не текла, а дремала, подернутая ряской, сквозь которую то и дело всплывали мутные, лопающиеся с влажным чмоканьем купола. Это спящее царство — лежбище бегемотов. Им б

custom 533726458638923020336❤‍🔥1913🎉2🥰2custom 53394315906635912782

10 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈2,930 views110 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Слепой Лучник Говорят, он ослеп, глядя на солнце, — мол, считал на нём пятна собственных грехов. Чушь собачья. Ему выжгли глаза калёным железом в подвалах инквизиции Ингольштадта, за то, что при свидетелях назвал герцога жирным пауком. Возможно, обмен вышел неравноценный, но торг уже не переиграть. Правда глаза колет. Теперь, коленопреклонённый, натягивающий тетиву, он видит куда больше, чем любой зрячий дозорный на

custom 53368577584970201246224custom 533726458638923020311❤‍🔥6👍3💋2🤝2

9 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,170 views169 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Совсем разобрался

custom 5339431590663591278104🔥3619😁7👍1💋1custom 53394794151244301731

8 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC≈2,190 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ядерный серфер «Безумие единиц — исключение, безумие целых групп, народов, времён — правило» (Ницше) Костюм пах тяжелым, нагретым металлом и старым потом. Гермозатворы на сочленениях скрежетали, будто зубы в аду, надрывно скрипели, когда он переставлял ноги по спекшемуся стеклу. Горизонт впереди жил своей жизнью — там, в ста километрах, вторая волна давала о себе знать вспышкой, ослепительной, как мгновение судного

❤‍🔥46🔥24custom 533725236720727544020custom 533685775849702012410😐2custom 53394315906635912782💋1🥰1

8 Jun 2026, 13:19 UTC≈2,310 views170 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем, кто поддерживает так или иначе всё, что я пишу, выпускаю и т.д., — огромное сердечное спасибо. Буду продолжать это делать для вас: работаю, готовлю новый материал, в перерывах набрасываю вот эти странные тексты. Это мой способ не закостенеть и не остановиться в развитии, по крайней мере, я так это вижу. Тем же, чьи чувства по той или иной причине задел, хотел бы сказать, что у меня не было такой цели. Ни в коем

🥰71❤‍🔥43🔥24custom 5337252367207275440148custom 53503826706416667525custom 53394315906635912783custom 53368577584970201242

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @katet19. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,173 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ка тет” (@katet19), 2,656 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katet19.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.