Channel
@katebtaskar
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,889subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001861139013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katebtaskar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katebtaskar |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ktebtn/15618 Dec 2023, 00:17 UTC | @katebtaskar/179 · this entry18 Dec 2023, 00:17 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ktebtn/15823 Dec 2023, 22:19 UTC | @katebtaskar/181 · this entry23 Dec 2023, 22:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ktebtn/16331 Dec 2023, 07:59 UTC | @katebtaskar/185 · this entry31 Dec 2023, 08:10 UTC | 1.00 | 10 minutes |
| @ktebtn/16431 Dec 2023, 17:19 UTC | @katebtaskar/186 · this entry31 Dec 2023, 17:20 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ktebtn | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ktebtn (13–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 December 2023 to 24 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ktebtn. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 1,889 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 1,897 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,898 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 1,898 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
936 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 502 | 53.6% | |
| 🔥 | 213 | 22.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 137 | 14.6% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 5.98% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 1.07% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.534% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 0.427% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.321% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.321% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.214% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.107% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 936reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2023 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم {قَاتِلُوهُمْ يُعَذِّبْهُمُ اللَّهُ بِأَيْدِيكُمْ وَيُخْزِهِمْ وَيَنصُرْكُمْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَيَشْفِ صُدُورَ قَوْمٍ مُّؤْمِنِينَ} أستهداف مباشر لقواة الاحتلال باب مخيم بلاطة من قبل جنود كتيبة عسكر ونأكد لكم اننا حاضرين بلميدان اخوتكم كتيبة عسكر_قوة الطارق
🔥47👍9❤7
﴿ وَلا تَحسَبَنَّ الَّذينَ قُتِلوا في سَبيلِ اللَّهِ أَمواتًا بَل أَحياءٌ عِندَ رَبِّهِم يُرزَقونَ ) نزف اليكم الشهداء الابطال الشهيد القائد : عبدالله ابو شلال الشهيد القائد : محمود ابو حمدان "الجري" الشهيدين الابطال : سيف و يزن النجمي الشهيد البطل : محمد القطاوي أبناء مخيم بلاطة الصمود الذين ضحو بأرواحهم من اجل الدفاع عن الارض و العرض و الدين شهد لهم الميدان بشراستهم ولقنو الاحتلال الغاشم دروس لن ينساها ترجلو …
❤🔥34❤10👍5
لن تمرووو من محيط عسكرنا بأمان زلزلنا المنظقة الشرقية بعيوه شديدة الانفجار عاش نفس الاعداد وتجهيز اخوتكم كتيبة عسكر _ قوة الطارق الوحده الخاصة سيف الاقصى
🔥41❤5💯3👍2
بسم الله حينما نبداء الكتيبة …. حاضرة 💛🤍🖤 برصاصها المبارك 🔥 و عبواتها من نقطة صفر 🔻 الحمد الله ما زال عزم الرجال قاهر الاحتلال اخوتكم كتيبة_عسكر قوة الطارق الوحده الخاصة سيف الاقصى
❤34🔥6👍2
مررنا ✌️ اشعلنا الفتيل 🔥 وما مررتم بأمان 🫡 جنودنا وضعو بصمات عبواتنا في محور البلدة القديمة 🥷🔻 كتيبةً عسكر _قوة الطارق الوحدة الخاصة سيف _ الاقصى
🔥39❤6👍5⚡4💘2
كتيبة عسكر (قوة الطارق) pinned Deleted message
رصد ..…. 👀 ثم أنفجار ….🔥ثم أشتباگ …. 🥷🔥 استهداف مباشر لقواة الاحتلال في حي المساكن الله يحمي رجال الكتيبة الوحدة الخاصة سيف _ الاقصى اخوتكم كتيبة عسكر قوة الطارق
❤60👍2❤🔥1
قال تعالى عزّ وجل وَلَا تَحْسَبَنَّ الَّذِينَ قُتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ أَمْوَاتًا بَلْ أَحْيَاءٌ عِنْدَ رَبِّهِمْ يُرْزَقُونَ صدق الله العظيم - بكل فخر واعتزاز تزف كتيبة عسكر _ قوة الطارق الى الجنان القائد الوطني الكبير الشيخ صالح العاروري القيادي في كتائب القسام مع ثلة من مرافقيه نحتسبكم عند الله من شهداء ولا حول ولا قوة الا بالله رسالتنا الى هذا المحتل الجبان الذي لا يعرف الا لغة ال…
❤26👍8💔2
وحدة الرصد و المتابعه zello بارك الله فيكم وثبتكم في الاجواء البارده انتم العين الساهره ونحن اليد الضاربة بأذن الله سيهزم الجمع و يولون الدبر اخوتكم كتيبة عسكر _ قوة الطارق
❤53❤🔥5👍4⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katebtaskar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كتيبة عسكر (قوة الطارق)” (@katebtaskar), 1,889 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katebtaskar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.