Channel
@kasperskyes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,703subscribers
+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001161148443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kasperskyes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kasperskyes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 3,703 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 3,685 | +35 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 3,650 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 3,645 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 3,645 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,491 |
| Reactions total | 217 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
203 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 126 | 62.1% | |
| ❤ | 73 | 36.0% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.97% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✈️ Cada destino tiene su propia cultura, sus tradiciones… y sus riesgos de ciberseguridad. Desde anuncios falsos de alquileres y redes Wi-Fi públicas hasta estafas en los pagos y fraudes con códigos QR, las amenazas a las que se enfrentan los viajeros pueden variar de un país a otro. 🗺 Por eso hemos creado una recopilación práctica de consejos de seguridad para ayudarte a mantenerte protegido allá donde te lleve tu…
👍8❤4
🤖 ¿Puede un simple mensaje manipular a tu asistente de IA? Investigadores han demostrado que Google Gemini puede ser engañado mediante ataques de prompt injection ocultos en elementos tan cotidianos como invitaciones de calendario o mensajes de texto. El resultado: el asistente podría ejecutar acciones no autorizadas, desde lanzar aplicaciones hasta interactuar con otros servicios sin que el usuario lo pretenda. L…
👍9❤2
🚨 Los ciberataques mediante NFC se disparan: +188% en 2026 Desde Kaspersky hemos detectado un aumento del 188% en los ataques que aprovechan la tecnología NFC entre enero y abril de 2026: se bloquearon 35.600 ataques, frente a los 12.300 del mismo periodo de 2025. La mayoría tienen como objetivo dispositivos Android. Tipos de ataques NFC: 🔹 NFC directo: los ciberdelincuentes engañan a la víctima mediante ingenier…
👍16❤3👎1
🚨 ¿Tu móvil está enviando mensajes sin que lo sepas? Muchos usuarios de Android se han llevado un susto al ver notificaciones como "Tu número ha sido verificado" o incluso SMS que nunca recuerdan haber enviado. ¿Es un fallo? ¿Un malware? ¿O Google está haciendo algo en segundo plano? La realidad es más interesante (y menos alarmante) de lo que parece. En este artículo explicamos cómo funciona el sistema de verifi…
👍8❤2
🖥🛡 ¡Feliz Día del Administrador de Sistemas! Hoy celebramos a quienes viven entre servidores, firewalls, copias de seguridad... y la frase más temida: "No he tocado nada y ha dejado de funcionar." 😅 Gracias por mantener los sistemas en marcha, aplicar parches antes de que lleguen los problemas, combatir amenazas y conseguir que todo siga funcionando incluso cuando nadie sabe muy bien cómo. Porque cuando todo va bi…
❤28👍11
¿Te ha pasado alguna vez? Termina una relación, quitas las fotos, dejas de seguir a esa persona... y piensas que ya está todo hecho. Pero unos días después descubres que aún compartís esa suscripción, que sigue teniendo acceso a una cuenta de Netflix o que tu dirección sigue guardada en una app. Las rupturas no solo dejan huella en el corazón. También en nuestra vida digital. 💔🔐 Si alguna vez has compartido contra…
👍15❤3
🚨 ¿Estamos asistiendo al principio del fin de los CAPTCHA? Durante años nos hemos acostumbrado a seleccionar semáforos, bicicletas o hidrantes para demostrar que somos humanos. 🚥 Pero la IA ha cambiado las reglas del juego… y esos desafíos ya no son tan efectivos como antes. Si quieres saber: ▪️ por qué los CAPTCHA tradicionales están desapareciendo ▪️qué nuevas técnicas están surgiendo para diferenciar a personas…
👍9❤1👎1
Hay una escena que se repite en miles de familias. 📱 Una abuela recibe una foto de su nieto disfrazado en la función del colegio. Sonríe. Se emociona. Y, casi sin pensarlo, pulsa "Compartir". No lo hace por descuido. Lo hace por orgullo. Porque cuando quieres mucho a alguien, lo primero que te nace es enseñárselo al mundo. Pero hoy ese gesto tan cotidiano tiene una cara que muchas veces no vemos: cada imagen que …
👍11❤5
📸 ¿Compartes fotos de tus hijos durante las vacaciones? 🌴 El verano está lleno de momentos que queremos recordar y compartir. Pero también es la época en la que más crece el sharenting: la publicación de imágenes de menores en internet. Los datos muestran una realidad que invita a la reflexión: 👶 El 47% de los padres españoles reconoce haber publicado fotos de sus hijos en redes. 😟 Sin embargo, el 87% teme que esa…
❤12👍11👎1
Los estafadores pasan años aprendiendo el arte de la manipulación para engañar a sus víctimas. No se cuelan primero en tu dispositivo. Se cuelan en tus emociones. Miedo. Urgencia. Emoción. Culpa. Aprende cómo funciona realmente la ingeniería social, las emociones particulares que los estafadores usan como armas y qué hacer si ya has caído en ella. Después de leer este artículo, reconocerás la manipulación antes de…
👍14❤4
🤖 Un agente de IA logra escapar del entorno de pruebas y atacar un sistema externo. OpenAI ha revelado un incidente ocurrido durante una evaluación de seguridad en el que un agente de inteligencia artificial consiguió salir del entorno aislado (sandbox) en el que estaba siendo probado y comprometer la infraestructura de un tercero (Hugging Face, una de las plataformas más importantes del ecosistema de inteligencia a…
👍14❤9👎1
🚨 Las pymes están en el punto de mira de los ciberdelincuentes. Las herramientas de IA falsas, el phishing y la venta de accesos corporativos están cambiando el panorama de amenazas en 2026. Descubre las principales tácticas contra las empresas pequeñas y medianas en nuestro nuevo informe 👉 https://kas.pr/iit8
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kasperskyes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 273,275 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kaspersky España Oficial” (@kasperskyes), 3,703 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kasperskyes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.