Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KasKar (gone)

Channel

KasKar (gone)

@kaskardisbanded

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

267subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003481093323
TypeChannel
Username@kaskardisbanded
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 23 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaskardisbanded

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2672812747 August 2026 — 270 subscribers8 August 2026 — 270 subscribers16 August 2026 — 272 subscribers24 August 2026 — 275 subscribers30 August 2026 — 277 subscribers8 September 2026 — 281 subscribers16 September 2026 — 279 subscribers30 September 2026 — 273 subscribers10 October 2026 — 267 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 64 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 07:38267-6
30 Sept 2026, 20:17273-6
16 Sept 2026, 22:21279-2
8 Sept 2026, 17:40281+4
30 Aug 2026, 23:42277+2
24 Aug 2026, 01:53275+3
16 Aug 2026, 17:45272+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:49270no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:05270first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11758.2%
❤8441.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 1 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Feb 2026, 21:40 UTC≈1,380 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hey, just for the less intelligent people around this community this is obviously not ever going to happen again «courtbox running kaskar», i first came aware of this "avax" person recently when he was publicly stating hes "claiming" court alias due to "court being inactive", he is a total lolcow. Even IF court "came back" just to give "avax" alias perms, that would never come back with a revival. Also, he knows abso…

👍44

14 Jan 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,060 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

incase channel is removed by telegram due to the main account being terminated. join t.me/kaskardisbandment

❤16

8 Jan 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,300 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

there seems to be a current group of people going around larping as courtbox & avox on discord, not being able to answer any simple questions that isnt anything public, @courtboxavoxlarp is a debunk channel, the larp "avox" seems to be giving out perms to rep and stuff its not real.

❤20

16 Dec 2025, 20:15 UTC≈1,350 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

last thing before i go back inactive completely, anyone who was associated with ((tears, buckshot, 800ds, whoz and whatever others)) generations around 2023 onwards was never in a real generation, voiding any “rep” perms to KasKar stop using our name & claiming us, Lastly Nobody at all has any permissions over the group including revival other than those previously listed. Also just because someone might have the new…

👍25❤9

7 Dec 2025, 22:25 UTC≈1,580 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

to anyone confused on the “opyzone” guy claiming avox gave him ownership is lying, 1: austin wants nothing to do with extortion com or the name avox due to him having a name for himself now and doing good irl 2: he said “extortion shit corny man i never even fucked with that it was all that nigga cb we had bigger plans” using his name wont get u far 3: he believes nobody should bring kaskar back out of the people wh…

👍23

23 Nov 2025, 14:52 UTC≈1,290 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

we have had plenty of "revivals" by a few people recently and none of them are real. dont fall for all the @kaskarrevival channels they are either trolls or larps, everything real resides here and neither of us nor courtbox wants the group back now let it go. Note to mention, we dont associate with any nefarious activities occurring under our name, nor do we associate with the acts of other people using our name.

❤17

23 Nov 2025, 02:40 UTC≈1,530 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Alright, so theres been alot of commotion going on with kaskar these past few years, theres been some real gens and some larped gens you couldnt even tell anymore, We’ve decided to keep kaskar shut completely from now on due to the rep, the whole ideal image of kaskar, newgens crave our rep because they think there “doing something for kaskar” when they dont do anything other than get cat scratches claiming theyre on…

❤22👍6

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kaskardisbanded. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KasKar (gone)” (@kaskardisbanded), 267 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaskardisbanded.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.