Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for УСТРАНЕНИЕ СОМНЕНИЙ

Channel

УСТРАНЕНИЕ СОМНЕНИЙ

@kashf_shubuhat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,811subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575323971
TypeChannel
Username@kashf_shubuhat
Created9 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kashf_shubuhat

Growth

2,8082,8162,8127 August 2026 — 2,815 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,811 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,808 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,811 subscribers2,8117 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,807–2,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:482,811+3
13 Aug 2026, 15:482,808-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:012,811-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:242,816+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:022,815no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:522,815first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 04s
Average length
5m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
103100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,150 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

〰️〰️〰️ 📚 🆕 Новинка от MAKTABATU TAWHID 🇸🇦 Книга: «Ответы шейха Салиха аль-Фавзана на вопросы о вере и неверии». 🇸🇦 Собрал и подготовил: Абдуль-Латиф ибн Убейд Ар-Рави аль-Хусейни 🇸🇦 Перед вами представлена очень важная книга, составленная из фетв шейха Салиха аль-Фавзана, да сохранит его Аллах, касающихся важных вопросов акыды: веры, неверия, многобожия, новшеств и суждений о неверии конкретной личности. 🇸🇦 t.me/

2

9 May 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,140 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0Video

🆕 КАК ОСУЩЕСТВИТЬ ЦЕЛЬ, РАДИ КОТОРОЫЙ МЫ СОЗДАНЫ? 🪶 Шейх Салих ас-Сувейих, да содействует ему Аллах! https://t.me/BLAGOE_SLOV0

4

9 May 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,190 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ибн аль-Асир сказал о хадисе «Не следует отправляться в путь (с целью поклонения), кроме как к трём мечетям: Запретной мечети (аль-Масджид аль-Харам), мечети Посланника ﷺ и мечети аль-Акса» — а он [Ибн аль-Асир] был ашаритом и умер ещё до рождения Ибн Таймии (да помилует его Аллах) — что смысл его таков: «Это не означает абсолютный запрет на поездки по любому поводу или для любого дела. Также под этим не подразумева

2

20 Apr 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,570 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Всё то, что мутазилиты открыто высказывали об арабском Коране, аль-Аш’ари и его сторонники также высказывали внешне. Однако он (аль-Аш’ари) поначалу прикрывался перед невеждами своими словами: "Коран извечен и не сотворен", а затем прямо заявил, что арабское построение (назм) является возникшим/совершенным (мухдас). Он приводил те же оправдания, что и мутазилиты, упоминая последовательность [звуков и букв] и прочее

4

20 Apr 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NAJD_COLLECTIONFile

🆕Новинка от 𝐍𝐀𝐉𝐃 𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 📒Книга: ОПАСНОСТЬ НАУЩЕНИЙ И СОМНЕНИЙ В АКЪЫДЕ 👤Автор: Шейх Солих ибн Мухаммад ас-Сувеййих (да хранит его Аллах) 🖋️Вступление к данному труду написал: Шейх Абдульазиз ар-Роджихи حفظه الله 🖱️NAJD MEDIA

5

26 Mar 2026, 04:33 UTC≈2,450 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdgstny

Джахмиты, по своему обыкновению, подняли шум вокруг слов, приведенных в «Сахихе» имама аль-Бухари (6/112) к аяту: «Всякая вещь погибнет, кроме Его Лика» (аль-Касас: 88): «...кроме Его власти (мульк). Также говорят: кроме того, чем желали Лика Аллаха». Они заявили: «Это и есть аллегорическое толкование (таъвиль) атрибута Лика!» Они солгали. Я подробно разоблачил ложность этих заявлений в своей книге «Слова имама аль

15

14 Mar 2026, 21:11 UTC≈1,970 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0Photo

🆕 ТРИДЦАТЬ ФЕТВ ОБ ОПРАВДАНИИ ПО НЕВЕЖЕСТВУ, ВЕРЕ И НЕВЕРИИ 🪶Бывший Муфтий КСА, Имам АбдульАзиз ибн Баз, да помилует его Аллах! 📹 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfuXLet1HFA t.me/BLAGOE_SLOV0

7

4 Mar 2026, 19:47 UTC≈2,210 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0Photo

🆕 Невежды, совершающие ширк, для нас — не мусульмане, а мушрики 🪶 Достопочтенный шейх Мухаммад ибн Салих аль-Усаймин, да помилует его Аллах! https://youtu.be/rn62DpJPkQM

13

4 Mar 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,350 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❓ Вопрос: Как нам считать исламским государство, которое не правит по нормам исламского шариата, в то время как в Коране сказано, что такие люди — неверующие (кяфиры), несправедливые (залимы) и нечестивцы (фасики)? Дайте нам ответ, да вознаградит вас Аллах благом. ☑️ Ответ шейха Ибн База, (да помилует его Аллах): Нужно изучать положение дел такого государства. Не следует поспешно называть его ни исламским, ни неверу

3

22 Feb 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,720 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0File

📕 40 ФЕТВ ОБ ОПРАВДАНИИ ПО НЕВЕЖЕСТВУ, ВЕРЕ И НЕВЕРИИ 🪶Муфтий КСА, шейх Салих аль-Фаузан, да хранит его Аллах! ℹ️ Целью этого труда является выявление лжи на ученого и защита убеждений ахлю-с-сунны, которые несет выдающийся ученый современности, имам приверженцев сунны, муфтий — шейх Салих ибн Фаузан аль-Фаузан, да вознаградит его Аллах наилучшим и продлит его жизнь во благо мусульман. 📹 Ссылка на видео, для тех,

3

20 Feb 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,410 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0Photo

🆕 40 ФЕТВ ОБ ОПРАВДАНИИ ПО НЕВЕЖЕСТВУ, ВЕРЕ И НЕВЕРИИ 🪶Главный Муфтий КСА, достопочтенный шейх Салих аль-Фаузан, да сохранит его Аллах! 📹 https://youtu.be/DKxUo_X3QwA t.me/BLAGOE_SLOV0

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kashf_shubuhat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 804,032 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“УСТРАНЕНИЕ СОМНЕНИЙ” (@kashf_shubuhat), 2,811 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashf_shubuhat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.