Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы @kasaibs

Channel

Отзывы @kasaibs

@kasaiotz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106773172
TypeChannel
Username@kasaiotz
Created23 December 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kasaiotz

Growth

811 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 8 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 07:1612 Aug 2026, 16:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:178no change
11 Aug 2026, 07:168first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2023 to 22 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Feb 2024, 10:55 UTC106 viewsread 12 August 2026

Купил у касая 1к голды сделал все быстро и накинул еще 500 в подарок

18 Feb 2024, 09:13 UTC135 viewsread 12 August 2026

Не смог словить сразу с роздачи водолейку эмз, но купил у касая, код пришел за 6 минут, спосибо

17 Feb 2024, 17:27 UTC142 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

АФИГЕТЬ... Купила 360 гемов и бп+ дали в подарок А еще получила вот такой вот скинчик, касаи, до последнего не верила, что это правда)

26 Jan 2024, 19:20 UTC199 viewsread 12 August 2026

Оставляю первый отзыв почти за месяц) Купила 360 гемов и не пожалела, касаи имбовый

2 Jan 2024, 10:11 UTC236 viewsread 12 August 2026

Перестал лить отзывы Так как отдыхал на новый год! С завтрашнего дня начинаю активно пополнять отзывы!

30 Dec 2023, 21:27 UTC241 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Купил 360 гемов +rep Правда на акцию не попал, ну ничего страшного, и так дешево))

👍1

30 Dec 2023, 10:19 UTC222 viewsread 12 August 2026

А##ЕТЬ Купила 2000 гемов за 500₽!! Я думала скам.. Касаи, я плачу, правда..) ❤️

27 Dec 2023, 20:00 UTC237 viewsread 12 August 2026

Я удивлен, честно) Думал скам, купил 80 гемов Скинул два кода, на 80 и 360 Лучший, братец❤️❤️❤️

25 Dec 2023, 15:43 UTC249 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Успел словить последний код на 80 гемов, катаю теперь с имбовым скином за 79 гемов❤️❤️

24 Dec 2023, 15:24 UTC234 viewsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо за подгон Оказывается, если у вас нету бойца, то при покупке скина на него, вам дадут и бойца и скин @kasaibs не ожидал, очень приятно)

24 Dec 2023, 15:17 UTC229 viewsread 12 August 2026

Заметил тебя в тик токе, думал очередной обманщик, который скамит обычных игроков, но нет) Взял тут 360 гемов на бп и скин, остался очень доволен) Лучший, брат👍

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kasaiotz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,119,802 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы @kasaibs” (@kasaiotz), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kasaiotz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.