Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Карл Невеликий

Channel

Карл Невеликий

@karlshuman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,078subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001578535207
TypeChannel
Username@karlshuman
Created28 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/karlshuman

Growth

1,0781,0791,078.56 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,078 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,078–1,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:021,078-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:341,079no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:421,079first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 1,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
122
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 April 20262 August 2026)
Views total243
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5635.9%
👍5233.3%
🔥106.41%
🤝95.77%
💯63.85%
🤔63.85%
👀42.56%
🥰42.56%
👎31.92%
👏31.92%
😁10.641%
🙊10.641%
🤨10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Отгадывал кроссворд и над ответом на вопрос - «артист в названии театра зверей», секунды не задумался… Правильно - Дуров)))

💯5

31 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTC139 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чувство злорадства не из благородных, но, увы, значится в списке фабричных настроек нашего вида. Вот и я... Пронеслось по новостям, что один из чиновников федерального уровня подал в отставку. Без конкретики, чтоб за язык не прищемили, но имеющий ум, да сообразит… Сперва подумалось – а вдруг на повышение? Но после донеслось то, в чем изначально личных сомнений не имелось: не справился; окружение воровало; да и к само

👍10💯1

2 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC251 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рады приветствовать тебя в нашем магазине оптовых цен ❤️ ⚡️Каждый день мы отправляем сотни заказов, вы радуете нас своими отзывами, поэтому мы решили сделать специальное предложение для наших новых клиентов! При заказе 7 блоков, в подарок на выбор получаете 2 блока (дешевле или в такую цену). Аналогично и 11 блоков, в подарок 3 блока и 16 блоков, в подарок 5🔥 ❓Как заказать? Написать мне @VlTALIY_SMOKE с этими да

25 Jun 2026, 04:19 UTC294 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://absatz.media/mneniya/168185-pochemu-film-gde-ty-o-propazhe-trehmesyachnogo-rebenka-stoit-posmotret-kazhdomu

1👍1

20 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC366 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍1🤨1😁1

6 Jun 2026, 01:13 UTC455 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @absatz_opinionPhoto

Какие главные слова мы услышали сегодня от Путина на ПМЭФ Своими впечатлениями от выступления президента делится обозреватель «Абзаца» Юрий Шумило. ПМЭФ при всей своей очевидной экономической целесообразности и нужности в этом году был, как, собственно, и всегда, особенно ценен возможностью послушать президента. Услышать то, чем сердце народное успокоится. Вступительное слово Владимира Владимировича было, как всег

5👍2🤔1

2 Jun 2026, 13:27 UTC354 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @absatz_opinionPhoto

Почему возвращение детских трудовых лагерей – задача непростая О вызвавшем волну ностальгии у старшего поколения предложении – обозреватель «Абзаца» Юрий Шумило. Ни дня без строчки! Это я тут про множество инициатив по улучшению законодательства в нашем благословенном Отечестве. Улучшения предлагают все: и инициативные простые сограждане, и персоны, чья профессиональная деятельность как раз в законодательных инициа

4🤔1

20 May 2026, 08:09 UTC302 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Скепсис. Общественный, а главное «ломовой», ну тех, кого принято величать ЛОМами. Для них то не так, это не эдак. Власть не понимает что творит. А они, ЛОМы, инфицированные постоянно торчащими перед лицами микрофонами и объективами, понимают. Думаю, скепсис это рукотворный и злонамеренный. Скажут (и уже говорят): а что ты, Шумило, этому скепсису противопоставишь? Отвечу: веру. Веру в здравый смысли многолетний опыт д

🤝9👍5🔥1

17 May 2026, 11:51 UTC302 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @absatz_opinionPhoto

Как военные помогали нам снимать кино Своими историями делится обозреватель «Абзаца» Юрий Шумило. В советском кино любая профессия – творческая. Даже если ты администратор, все равно имеешь свое амплуа. Подразделялась по амплуа административная группа так: зам по бумагам (ведение делопроизводства, координация и отчетность), зам по подготовке съемок и администратор на площадке. Замов по подготовке бывало несколько

🔥92

5 May 2026, 13:11 UTC318 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @absatz_opinionPhoto

Как сотрудник спецслужб КНДР помогал нам кино снимать Своими историями делится обозреватель «Абзаца» Юрий Шумило. Северные корейцы отменно показали себя в СВО. Хорошо воевали, проявили едва ли не массовый героизм. При этом у нас преступно мало знают об этом народе. К тому же большую часть из того, что знают, составляет либеральная пропаганда. Дескать, живут на севере Корейского полуострова люди в условиях лютого то

👍103

29 Apr 2026, 18:43 UTC292 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @absatz_opinionPhoto

Почему в советском кино долгое время отсутствовала профессия каскадера Своими киноисториями делится обозреватель «Абзаца» Юрий Шумило. Впервые услышал про отечественных каскадеров от замечательного ленфильмовского оператора Юрия Векслера в далеком 1983-м. О профессии я знал из американского фильма «Трюкач», разогнавшего юношеские представления о волшебном мире кино. Юрий Аркадьевич тогда рассказал, попутно романти

5👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @karlshuman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Карл Невеликий” (@karlshuman), 1,078 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karlshuman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.