Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Институт карго-культурологии (ИКК)

@kargokult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,574subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148297361
TypeChannel
Username@kargokult
Created29 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kargokult

Growth

2,5742,5792,576.55 August 2026 — 2,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,579 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,576 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,574 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,573–2,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:552,574-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:282,576-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:222,579no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:322,579first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

242 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9438.8%
😁3213.2%
💯3112.8%
👍2811.6%
🤩114.55%
93.72%
🙏62.48%
👏52.07%
41.65%
❤‍🔥31.24%
🌚31.24%
🙈31.24%
🙉31.24%
😈20.826%
🤣20.826%
🫡20.826%
👻10.413%
😎10.413%
🤔10.413%
🤪10.413%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 25 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTC≈4,060 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Бабкизм эз из

💯10😁1

Signed 🌴

7 Feb 2026, 04:07 UTC≈5,010 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

1️⃣ #КонспирачCтрим: «Основы эпштейноведения» Обсудили с ДОРОГИМИ КУМАМИ Кофе, Виктором Акусовым и Андрболлом жизнь и смерть (?) Джеффри Эпштейна, кто есть в файлах Эпштейна, почему «российская» «либеральная» «оппозиция» оправдывает его, а также – поговорили про связь с Трампом и привязку к Рашагейту, Машу Дрокову и многое-многое другое. ➡️ Слушать запись ⬅️ в mp3/mp4 (доступна при подписке от Юного каргозавра и вы

4

Signed 🌴

5 Feb 2026, 20:47 UTC≈4,620 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Приходите сегодня в 20:00 по мск на наш первый Конспирач-стрим под названием «Основы эпштейноведения»! Обсудим жизнь и смерть (?) Джеффри Эпштейна, а также т.н. файлы Эпштейна, шумиху вокруг них и многое другое. ➡️ ЭФИР БУДЕТ ТУТ ⬅️ Задать вопрос в эфир: ➡️ DonateX (донаты открывают разные гифки, включая секретные) ✅ CloudTips (донат зачитывается ведущим) 💳 Другие способы

🔥5👍1

Signed 🌴

2 Feb 2026, 13:25 UTC≈5,820 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скоро обсудим файлы Эпштейна на эфире. Я как постмолодой наблюдатель этой истории – ещё с пиццагейта – имею кое-что сказать. Так что следите за анонсами. Ну и да, сколько вы насчитаете педопрезидентов США?

🔥14🙈3👏1

Signed 🌴

23 Jan 2026, 20:04 UTC≈5,380 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Причём через полезность технологических заимствований частенько объясняют и полезность заимствований культурных. Тут возникает вопрос в искренности/наивности таких улучшаторов. Пока такое ещё прокатывает, раз дискуссия идёт буквально с одними и теми же (контр)аргументами как минимум полтора десятилетия – с того времени, как я, собственно, и начал свою блогерскую деятельность. БЕСКОНЕЧНЫЙ КАРГОВИЧОК.

👍6💯4

Signed 🌴

20 Jan 2026, 20:01 UTC≈4,940 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Долинизм как частный случай бабкизма Многие задавались вопросом в связи с медиабурей вокруг Ларисы Долиной: что это вообще было? Как мы достигли таких уровней крутости, которые едва ли вообще возможны? 19 января 2026 года пришла новость, что бабка вроде как повержена – по информагентствам, СМИ и пабликам разлетелась фотография адвоката Полины Лурье с ключами в руках. Мы помним славные победы? Однако праздновать ран

🔥5👏2

Signed 🌴

15 Oct 2025, 17:37 UTC≈3,040 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Источник @kargokult 🌴 Тексты

🤩11🔥3

Signed 🌴

18 Sept 2025, 15:51 UTC≈5,320 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кёрк-момент (Заметки на полях Великой перегрузки. Часть 4) Уже неделя прошла с убийства Чарли Кёрка, – пожалуй, самого громкого убийства в новейшей американской истории со времëн Джона Кеннеди. Я предлагаю вашему вниманию подробный разбор творящегося в Америке кёркоцентричного безумия: срачи, увольнения и пиар-на-трупе. В главных ролях: Биби Нетаньяху, Джей Ди Вэнс, Дональд Трамп, Такер Карлсон, Кэндис Оуэнс, Сэм

🔥5👏2🤣2

Signed 🌴

13 Sept 2025, 10:05 UTC≈5,540 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все мы выросли в Америке, которой нет ©️

🔥12🙏2

Signed 🌴

6 Sept 2025, 12:59 UTC≈2,070 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚬🚬🚬 #медиапитомник

😁17😎1

Signed 🌴

5 Sept 2025, 19:11 UTC≈7,410 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обсуждение статьи про красный террор в Рыбинске в очередной раз подсветило ряд характерных особенностей т.н. красно-белого срача, которые я бы хотел зафиксировать: 1️⃣ Уровень дискуссии по-прежнему низок; 2️⃣ Аргументум ад белотеррорум и николашковоронострелярум – по мысли современных красновичков вброс этих конструкций должен как-то оправдать действия исторических красных (большевиков); 3️⃣ Термин «красно-белый

🔥9💯63👻1🤔1

Signed 🌴

25 Aug 2025, 19:17 UTC≈5,520 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подумалось мне, вот обостряются российско-азербайджанские отношения, потихоньку зачищаются диаспоральные лидеры и лоббисты, наших граждан избивают и берут в заложники... А где же НАШИ СЛОНЫ-азербайджанцы с русской культурной идентичностью™️, которые обличали бы своих зарвавшихся соплеменников и приветствовали абсолютно законные и верные действия нашего политического руководства? Неиронично интересно, есть ли вообще

🔥7💯5🙏2😁1

Signed 🌴

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kargokult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2025, 09:26 UTCAnonymous Poll506 voters

Должны ли русские каяться за расстрел царской семьи?

  1. Да18%
  2. Нет75%
  3. Свой вариант (напишите в комментах)7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 25 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 490,642 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Институт карго-культурологии (ИКК)” (@kargokult), 2,574 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kargokult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.