Channel
@karen_igityan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001969061282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karen_igityan |
| Description | Кавказовед Карен Арменович Игитян |
| Created | 5 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karen_igityan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 155 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 May 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 50 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 66.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 11.8% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обсудили много вопросов, в том числе - как будет Алиев будет вести боевые действия против Армении, при помощи заселения "западных азербайджанцев", как будет меняться история и пр. https://youtu.be/fVNQ-g5UXFg?si=7gHcl-NyVF6VktkF
👍1🔥1
Прокомментировал протурецкую политику Пашиняна, "разговор" с председателем ОБСЕ для 5 канала. https://youtu.be/jtVoq3f__Jc?is=2E4S0db-1EEzhZOC
👍1
🔊Карен Игитян: Преференции для Армении будут убыточными для ЕС, а значит временными В признании геноцида армян 1915 года в Османской Империи Израилем мы видим чистую политическую конъюнктуру, комментирует политолог Карен Игитян. Можно было использовать это на геополитической арене, если бы нынешние армянские власти поддержали идею. Сейчас ЕС в экстренном порядке дает Армении возможность выхода на свой потребительск…
👍3
🔺Почему убрали фамилию Амиряна? Все просто. Он не нравится алиевскому режиму (а значит и пашиняновскому). Алиевский режим придумал "геноцид в Баку" 1918 года, а виновными объявил армян - руководителей Бакинской коммуны и в том числе Амиряна. Кроме прочего азагитроп провозгласил отдельно от остальных врагом - командира кавалерийского отряда Татевоса Амирова (брат Арсена Амиряна). Поэтому у этого "простого переимено…
👍1🔥1
Итак, пока режим Пашиняна рассказывает о мире и повышении пенсий, в Баку продвигают проект "Западный Азербайджан". Сегодня, в Баку был представлен доклад "о языке ненависти и фальсификации истории в армянских школах". Кто представил и комментировал результаты "работы"? Поддерживаемый администрацией Алиева, Центр стратегических коммуникаций (представлял замглавы центра) и заведующий "отделом истории Западного Азерб…
👍3🤔1
Когда режим Пашиняна более протурецкий, чем режим Алиева. Азербайджан приветствовал достижение соглашения между США и Ираном, отметив роль Пакистана. Пашинян же отметил роль Пакистана, Катара и Турции.
💯1🤔1😁1
О чем договорились Хикмет Гаджиев и Армен Григорян? Итак, читаем: "Стороны также обменялись мнениями по поводу мероприятий, направленных на укрепление взаимного доверия между гражданскими обществами двух стран". Что такое укрепление доверия по-алиевски? В Азербайджане и на международных площадках будут продвигать фальсификат под названием "Западный Азербайджан", в Армению будут приезжать "западные азербайджанцы", р…
💯4😁2👏1
О выборах в Армении, российско-армянских отношениях и ситуации вокруг Ирана https://youtu.be/E3MOJdkkoU8?is=SWcuM7XsvEmZvr0m
👍1
При всех нарушениях со стороны действующих властей, партия Пашиняна не набрала и половины голосов. Это полностью разрушает миф о всенародной поддержке, которая якобы есть у Пашиняна и его курса. Большинство граждан Армении его не поддержали, высказались за другие силы", - сказал он. Эксперт отметил, что в свете этого политический ландшафт страны стал другим, указав на то, что партия Пашиняна набрала на 39 тыс. голо…
👍4
Политолог Карен Игитян в разговоре с «Лентой.ру» заявил, что формально выборы можно считать состоявшимися, но проходили они в условиях жесткого административного давления со стороны действующих властей. Он напомнил, что часть кандидатов в депутаты от «Сильной Армении» и других политических сил остаются в СИЗО, а полиция задерживала оппозиционных активистов прямо во время агитации. «Результаты выборов, на мой взгляд,…
👍3
Сегодня с радостью узнал об освобождении из тюрьмы Баграта Србазана! Свободу всем армянским политическим заключённым!
👍8🔥5🙏2
Прокомментировал ситуацию вокруг нападок на Армянскую Апостольскую Церковь и Русскую Православную Церковь со стороны правительства Пашиняна и невмешательства ЕС. https://youtu.be/QuTCv8t_U0w?is=FfGyIPLNNgbZlelJ
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @karen_igityan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,454 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Карен Игитян” (@karen_igityan), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karen_igityan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.