11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,480–4,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 12:16
4,485
-4
3 Sept 2026, 14:57
4,489
-10
31 Aug 2026, 14:34
4,499
-2
28 Aug 2026, 09:02
4,501
-3
24 Aug 2026, 23:52
4,504
-1
21 Aug 2026, 04:02
4,505
-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:08
4,509
-5
14 Aug 2026, 12:05
4,514
-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:07
4,516
-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:46
4,519
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:15
4,519
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,700 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,628
60.3%
❤
403
14.9%
🔥
335
12.4%
👍
135
5.00%
💯
112
4.15%
⚡
39
1.44%
👏
34
1.26%
🏆
9
0.333%
🥰
5
0.185%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,700 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
105
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @karavaevkirill. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2024 to 20 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну вот и всё…. Мы продали почти весь тираж книги Фантазёр.
Мне почти каждый день пишут про «Фантазёра». Кто-то благодарит, кто-то присылает фото страниц, кто-то говорит, что читал вслух близким. И иногда даже: «это лучшее, что я читал».
И я каждый раз немного теряюсь. Потому что я писал её не как книгу, которая должна кого-то менять. Я просто пытался честно разобраться в вещах, в которых сам долго путался. И вообще…
Парадокс носка. Это когда носок остался в одиночестве, даже если ты точно помнишь, что положил в стирку пару. Есть предположения, что в стиральных машинах при определённом вращении барабана активируется «кротовая нора», и в Параллельную Вселенную затягивает только один носок. Бывали и обратные случаи — когда из машинки доставали на один носок больше. #книгафантазер
Говори, как НАДО, а не как НЕ надо
Если ты объясняешь человеку, что он делает не так, это вызовет сопротивление. Если скажешь, как надо, — он просто сделает. Ну и это быстрее.
👎 «Не ставь кружку на край стола, она упадёт!»
✅ «Ставь кружку ближе к центру, так безопаснее»
Работает даже на себе самом.
#книгафантазер
Если задуматься, Риэлтор — это платная функция «посидеть на сайте или позвонить вместо меня». Человек между мной и квартирой, созданный из неловкости и людской лени.
Как если бы при покупке дивана приходил посредник и брал полдивана за то, что спросил: «он мягкий?»
На самом деле, в Падежах русского языка скрыта целая любовная история, если расположить их в таком порядке:
предложный, дательный, именительный,
творительный, родительный, винительный.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @karavaevkirill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Наши страхи \ Медиа @moystrakh · 62,528 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фантазёр” (@karavaevkirill), 4,485 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karavaevkirill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
