ثبت نام در بهترین و خفن ترین مستر کلاس کار عمیق آغاز شد 🔥🚀 🌐 اطلاعات دوره: مسیر یادگیری دوره پشتوانه علمی دوره نتایج و خروجی دوره 🔥ظرفیت: 8 نفر 💎 ثبت نام در دوره
👏1

Channel
@karamigh_royal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004378577551 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karamigh_royal |
| Created | 20 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karamigh_royal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 14 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 11 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (20 July 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,046 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ثبت نام در بهترین و خفن ترین مستر کلاس کار عمیق آغاز شد 🔥🚀 🌐 اطلاعات دوره: مسیر یادگیری دوره پشتوانه علمی دوره نتایج و خروجی دوره 🔥ظرفیت: 8 نفر 💎 ثبت نام در دوره
👏1
ثبتنام مسترکلاس کار عمیق آغاز شد. در این دوره یاد میگیری: ✓ کنترل توجهت را پس بگیری ✓ اهمالکاری را کاهش دهی ✓ سیستم شخصی بهرهوری بسازی ✓ ذهن شفافتری داشته باشی ✓ خروجیهای ارزشمند خلق کنی ⏳مدت دوره: ۲۸ روز 🚀شروع مسیر: امروز 🔗 ثبتنام در مسترکلاس کار عمیق
👍1
مستر کلاس کار عمیق pinned a photo
خروجی نهایی دوره در پایان ۲۸ روز، فرد یاد میگیرد: وضوح ذهنی تشخیص کارهای مهم کاهش آشفتگی ذهنی تصمیمگیری بهتر تمرکز لیزری کار کردن بدون حواسپرتی حفظ توجه روی اهداف مهم کنترل زمان مدیریت آگاهانه روز کاهش اهمالکاری خلق خروجی ارزشمند تبدیل ایدهها به عمل ساخت نتایج واقعی 🔥ثبت نام در مستر کلاس کار عمیق
👍1
پشتوانه علمی و فکری دوره محتوای دوره بر اساس ترکیب مفاهیم ۱۵ اثر مطرح جهانی طراحی شده است: ۱ . کار عمیق کال نیوپورت موضوع: تمرکز عمیق حذف کارهای سطحی تولید خروجی ارزشمند ۲. تفکر، سریع و کند دنیل کانمن موضوع: شناخت عملکرد ذهن خطاهای شناختی ۳. عادتهای اتمی جیمز کلیر موضوع: ساخت سیستمهای پایدار تغییر رفتار ۴. غرقگی میهای چیکسنتمیهای موضوع: تجربه Flow تمرکز کامل ۵. رامنشدنی نیر ایال موضوع: کنترل حواسپرتی ۶. چهار هز…
👍1
۴. مسیر تحول دوره مسیر دوره بر اساس چهار مرحله طراحی شده است: مرحله اول: تمرکز لیزری 💎هدف: یادگیری توانایی قفل کردن توجه روی یک هدف مشخص. 💎دستاورد: کاهش پراکندگی ذهن حذف عوامل مزاحم افزایش قدرت تمرکز مرحله دوم: ذهن شفاف 💎هدف: پاکسازی ذهن از آشفتگیها و ایجاد فضای مناسب برای فکر کردن. ✅دستاورد: کاهش فشار ذهنی مدیریت بهتر افکار تصمیمگیری واضحتر مرحله سوم: غرقگی هدفمند 💎هدف: یادگیری ورود به حالت Flow یا غر…
👍1
مسترکلاس کار عمیق ۱. معرفی دوره مسترکلاس کار عمیق یک مسیر ۲۸ روزه برای بازسازی توانایی تمرکز، مدیریت ذهن، کنترل زمان و افزایش کیفیت خروجیهای شخصی و حرفهای است. هدف اصلی دوره این است که فرد از شرایطی مانند: پراکندگی ذهنی وابستگی به حواسپرتیهای دیجیتال اهمالکاری کار زیاد با نتیجه کم نداشتن سیستم مشخص برای مدیریت زمان به سمت شرایطی مانند: تمرکز عمیق ذهن شفاف مدیریت آگاهانه زمان خلق خروجیهای ارزشمند ساخت سیستم شخصی…
❔یک سوال: سه ماه دیگر... میخواهی هنوز همان چرخه تکراری را ادامه بدهی؟ 👀یا میخواهی از امروز ساختن نسخه متمرکزتر خودت را شروع کنی؟ 🧠ذهن تو مهمترین ابزار زندگی توست. ⚡️وقت آن رسیده دوباره فرمان را به دست بگیری. 🔥ثبتنام مسترکلاس کار عمیق باز است
🕰اگر الان احساس میکنی وقت نداری... احتمالاً دقیقاً به همین دلیل به این مسیر نیاز داری.✅ مشکل بسیاری از افراد کمبود زمان نیست.❌ مشکل این است که زمانشان توسط صدها حواسپرتی کوچک مصرف میشود.⛔️ کار عمیق یعنی پس گرفتن همین زمانهای از دست رفته.
ثبتنام مسترکلاس کار عمیق آغاز شد. در این دوره یاد میگیری: ✓ کنترل توجهت را پس بگیری ✓ اهمالکاری را کاهش دهی ✓ سیستم شخصی بهرهوری بسازی ✓ ذهن شفافتری داشته باشی ✓ خروجیهای ارزشمند خلق کنی ⏳مدت دوره: ۲۸ روز 🚀شروع مسیر: امروز 🔗 ثبتنام در مسترکلاس کار عمیق
تصور کن ۲۸ روز دیگر... صبحها با ذهنی آرام بیدار شوی. بدانی مهمترین کار امروز چیست. بدون جنگ ذهنی شروع کنی. بدون فرار به گوشی. بدون عقب انداختن. و بتوانی روی کارهای مهمت مثل یک لیزر تمرکز کنی. این همان تغییری است که مسترکلاس «کار عمیق» برای ساختنش طراحی شده.
این دوره فقط یک سری توصیه انگیزشی نیست. ساختار آن بر اساس ترکیب ۱۵ اثر بزرگ جهانی طراحی شده: 📘 کار عمیق 📘 عادتهای اتمی 📘 تفکر سریع و کند 📘 غرقگی 📘 مینیمالیسم دیجیتال 📘 اوج و... هدف: ساخت یک سیستم واقعی برای مدیریت ذهن و زمان.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @karamigh_royal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,104,526 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مستر کلاس کار عمیق” (@karamigh_royal), 14 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karamigh_royal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.