Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KAOS

Channel

KAOS

@kaos_russia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

777subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003272692029
TypeChannel
Username@kaos_russia
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaos_russia

Growth

7257777517 August 2026 — 725 subscribers8 August 2026 — 744 subscribers16 August 2026 — 777 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 717–785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:34777+33
8 Aug 2026, 08:12744+19
7 Aug 2026, 09:48725first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.0%
avg views ÷ 777 subscribers
Avg views / post
373
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,986
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

273 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9835.9%
🔥9635.2%
❤‍🔥207.33%
🏆155.49%
👍93.30%
💯82.93%
👏72.56%
😍51.83%
😈41.47%
👀31.10%
🤔31.10%
🤯20.733%
👌10.366%
😁10.366%
🙏10.366%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC49 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍Где купить KAOS? Не нашли KAOS в своем городе? Или хотите узнать, где продается продукция рядом с вами? Для этого у нас есть бот 👇 Как воспользоваться: • Нажмите кнопку «Где купить?». • Выберите свой город из списка. • Если вашего города пока нет, нажмите «Моего города нет» и оставьте заявку. Мы обязательно учтем ваш запрос. Если вы знаете магазин, где уже продается KAOS, но его нет в списке, напишите нам адрес

4👍2👏2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC223 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы давно спрашивали нас об этом 👀 Мы долго работали над новым продуктом, тестировали, дорабатывали и наконец готовы показать результат! Совсем скоро расскажем все детали 🤫 🔜 Оставайтесь с нами!

🏆9🔥4😍2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC300 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎟 Разыгрываем 2 билета на второй день Vape Club Show 2026! Хотите попасть на VCS? Тогда у вас есть возможность выиграть пригласительные! 🖤 Для участия нужно: ✔️Подписаться на Telegram-канал KAOS. ✔️Подписаться на Telegram-канал Vape Club Show. ✔️Перейти в Telegram-канал Vape Club Show. ✔️Поставить ❤️ на 3 последние публикации. ✔️Написать под любым постом комментарий: «Я иду на VCS». 📅 Победителей выберем случайны

🔥114🏆4👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC457 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

KAOS едет на VCS! 🚀 Совсем скоро встретимся на VCS 2026! 📆 29–30 августа Мы подготовили для вас новинки, большой розыгрыш, фирменный стенд и ещё много интересного. 📍Ждём вас на стенде №414! Будем рады увидеться, пообщаться и познакомить вас с KAOS. До встречи на VCS! ❤️ Навигация по каналу Конкурс

🔥154😍3👏2

28 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC574 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2610❤‍🔥7👏2

25 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC440 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👀Кажется, мы кое-что готовим… Остались последние приготовления, и уже совсем скоро запустим наш конкурс. Не пропустите. 🖤

❤‍🔥13👀3🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC485 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какого вкуса, по вашему мнению, не хватает в KAOS ❓

  1. Напитки38%
  2. Десерты19%
  3. Необычные сочетания52%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5

22 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC458 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какого вкуса, по вашему мнению, не хватает в KAOS?🤔 Мы уже рассказали про наши линейки, но всегда интересно узнать, чего хочется именно вам. Голосуйте в опросе ниже⬇️ А если вашего варианта нет – напишите его в комментариях . Возможно, именно он вдохновит нас на следующий вкус 🙌🏼

7👍1🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC468 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что делает ECLIPSE таким комфортным в использовании? 👀 Всё дело в технологиях внутри. ⚡️ Гибридный никотин ION – мягкий старт, стабильная насыщенность и чистая передача вкуса. 💨 Двойной Mesh-испаритель 2×1Ω помогает раскрывать вкус равномерно и сохранять его насыщенность до конца использования. 🎛 Два режима работы: • Standard – до 35 000 затяжек, 16W; • Boost – до 18 000 затяжек, 18W для более насыщенной тяги. 🌬

12🔥4🤯2

15 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC351 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✔️ «Честный знак» – это просто наклейка? Нет. «Честный знак» – государственная система маркировки, которая помогает отслеживать путь товара от производителя до покупателя. Что это даёт? • подтверждение легального происхождения продукции; • возможность проверить товар через приложение «Честный знак»; • дополнительную защиту от подделок. Продукция KAOS проходит обязательную маркировку «Честный знак» и соответствует

11👍4🏆2👌1👏1💯1😁1

10 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC338 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кислое любят не все и это нормально 🍋 У каждого свои любимые вкусы. Кто-то выбирает сладкие сочетания, а кто-то ищет ту самую яркую кислинку. Именно для таких мы сделали линейку SOUR - пять насыщенных вкусов с выразительной кислинкой, которая чувствуется с первой затяжки. А ты уже нашёл свой вкус в SOUR? ❤️ — да, это моё 🤔 — ещё выбираю 🙏🏻 — предпочитаю другие линейки Навигация по каналу

11🔥1🤔1🙏1

8 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC349 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Факт или миф❓ «Чем крепче устройство, тем оно лучше.» ❌ Скорее миф. На ощущения влияет не только крепость. Гораздо важнее то, как устройство передаёт вкус, насколько стабильно работает испаритель и сохраняется ли насыщенность от первой до последней затяжки. Именно поэтому два устройства с одинаковой крепостью могут ощущаться совершенно по-разному. Выбирайте не только цифры на упаковке, выбирайте качество самого

11🔥7🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kaos_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

Какого вкуса, по вашему мнению, не хватает в KAOS ❓

  1. Напитки38%
  2. Десерты19%
  3. Необычные сочетания52%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jun 2026, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Оцени свой уровень холодка по шкале от 1 до 5 👇

  1. 117%
  2. 212%
  3. 327%
  4. 415%
  5. 532%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,285,661 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KAOS” (@kaos_russia), 777 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaos_russia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.