Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 康仔的路

Channel

康仔的路

@kangzai4

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

26subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212415392
TypeChannel
Username@kangzai4
Created18 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kangzai4

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

262726.57 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:5726-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:3127no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5027first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 18 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬14523.6%
👎10817.6%
🤮9816.0%
😱9715.8%
💩538.63%
😢487.82%
👍345.54%
❤203.26%
🔥101.63%
😁10.163%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2024 to 23 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2025, 18:22 UTC700 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

插播一个骗子,为了大家资金的安全: 点击 被骗当事人 @datuge888 受害者大号 @tuzifa 观看OKpay承兑百信承兑陈亮亮跑路装死全过程 诈骗犯 @j36369933 刚改了新的用户名:百信U商 纯白资 陈亮亮340304198606251418 骗子 手机号 18055211913 微信号 lx8506165 微信小号 lx8506165 骗子前妻信息 徐孝敏 340311199106071822 手机号 18055205792 根据可靠消息 陈亮亮此人在okpay低价收u 在福利来出料子,各位玩家或者交易用户可以咨询下自己熟悉的u商或承兑

🔥6❤3

6 Jun 2025, 08:14 UTC≈1,370 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

@aaacpdd 跑我1400元。 2025年,5.29日,我阑尾炎,割了,那天出院 头昏,转错给他支付宝1400元,第一时间联系他,他说晚上还,然后拖了我一个星期,还不给我,羊登铭,大家都注意点吧。1400元抓住机会就跑你,无信人则不立,大家都小心点。 tg用户名: @aaacpdd 身份证实名:羊登铭 身份证号:羊登铭 522322200102020593 贵州省-黔西南布依族苗族自治州-兴仁县

❤9👍4🔥4

21 May 2025, 08:41 UTC≈1,270 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

打下广告:好玩的加拿大网盘主群 @Canada197,想玩加拿大的,可以关注下

👎2👍1

15 Dec 2024, 14:54 UTC≈4,190 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

有人转错1400u,直接退回!诚信交易,童叟无欺!

👍17❤2

18 Aug 2024, 19:46 UTC≈4,490 views548 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

一致好评,有魔力的U

🤬145👎104🤮98😱97💩53😢48❤2😁1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kangzai4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“康仔的路” (@kangzai4), 26 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kangzai4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.